Employer record, U.S. Labor Department investigations

Subway Wage and Hour Cases in California

Benjamin Eghbali, Esq.Legal notes by Benjamin Eghbali, Esq.

Subway: 67 investigations, $542,707 in back wages for 290 workers, latest closed Sep 16, 2024.

Every federal wage and hour case closed in California since 2004 and a handful before: 30,596 investigations, 23,910 employers, $472,441,289 in back wages for 335,130 workers.

Subway wage and hour record at a glance

Subway appears in 67 concluded Wage and Hour Division investigations in California, closed between Sep 22, 2004 and Sep 16, 2024. 53 of them found violations, 677 in all, and the employer agreed to pay $542,707 in back wages to 290 workers, plus $323,386 in civil money penalties. Of the back wages, $124,223 was unpaid overtime and $228,775 unpaid minimum wage under the federal standard. The largest single case closed Sep 25, 2023 in Brentwood with $475,000 for 177 workers. The Division flagged 3 cases as repeat or willful. 66 minors were involved in child labor findings. That places the employer at #110 of 23,910 California employers in the database by back wages.

Industry as coded by the Division: Limited-Service Eating Places; Specialty Food Stores. Laws involved: FLSA, child labor.

Every case, newest first

Case closedPeriod investigatedCityFindingsBack wagesWorkers paidPenaltiesLaws
Sep 16, 2024Sep 2021 to Sep 2024Los Angeles2 violations000FLSA
Aug 15, 2024Jan 2023 to Aug 2024San Diegono violations found000
May 21, 2024May 2022 to May 2024La Mesano violations found000
May 2, 2024Sep 2023 to May 2024San Pablono violations found000
Sep 25, 2023Apr 2020 to Sep 2023Brentwood429 violations repeat$475,000177$284,242FLSA, child labor
Jun 16, 2023Aug 2021 to Jun 2023Willits9 violations00$9,014child labor
Oct 12, 2021Oct 2019 to Oct 2021Murrieta1 violation000FLSA
Mar 16, 2021Mar 2019 to Mar 2021Hesperiano violations found000
Mar 2, 2021Mar 2019 to Mar 2021Highland2 violations00$1,713child labor
Jan 31, 2020Feb 2018 to Jan 2020San Diegono violations found000
Oct 1, 2019Oct 2017 to Oct 2019Signal Hillno violations found000
Apr 1, 2019May 2018 to Apr 2019Rancho Cucamonga5 violations$44230FLSA
Mar 18, 2019May 2018 to Mar 2019Rancho Cucamonga6 violations repeat$33340FLSA
Oct 23, 2018Oct 2016 to Oct 2018Sacramento17 violations000FLSA, child labor
Jan 31, 2018Mar 2017 to Jan 2018San Diego1 violation00$641child labor
Nov 28, 2017Nov 2015 to Nov 2017Gardenano violations found000
Nov 21, 2017Nov 2015 to Nov 2017Los Angelesno violations found000
Feb 19, 2016Feb 2014 to Feb 2016Fontana1 violation$5410FLSA
Nov 3, 2015Nov 2013 to Nov 2015Encino2 violations000child labor
Oct 20, 2015Oct 2013 to Oct 2015Kerman1 violation$7410FLSA
Sep 1, 2015Aug 2012 to Sep 2015Fremont4 violations$15,88630FLSA
May 6, 2015May 2013 to May 2015Lakeport1 violation000FLSA
May 5, 2015May 2013 to May 2015Sacramento1 violation000FLSA
May 4, 2015May 2013 to May 2015Suisun City2 violations repeat$8,59510FLSA
Feb 3, 2015Feb 2013 to Feb 2015Lompoc4 violations$65830FLSA
Feb 3, 2015Feb 2013 to Feb 2015Lompoc6 violations$45550FLSA
Feb 3, 2015Feb 2013 to Feb 2015Lompoc5 violations$33640FLSA
Feb 3, 2015Feb 2013 to Feb 2015Lompoc5 violations$28540FLSA
Jan 17, 2014Jan 2012 to Jan 2014West Sacramento7 violations$12,64850FLSA
Dec 9, 2013Dec 2010 to Dec 2013Fontana1 violation000FLSA
Oct 26, 2013Oct 2011 to Oct 2013Modesto7 violations$1,44560FLSA
Apr 15, 2013Apr 2011 to Apr 2013Sacramento15 violations$7,94470FLSA
Jan 31, 2013Feb 2011 to Jan 2013Ventura5 violations$31140FLSA
May 25, 2012May 2010 to May 2012Solana Beach2 violations$8410FLSA
May 24, 2012May 2010 to May 2012Encinitas1 violation000FLSA
May 23, 2012May 2010 to May 2012Carlsbad1 violation000FLSA
May 22, 2012Jan 2011 to May 2012Carlsbadno violations found000
May 15, 2012May 2010 to May 2012Carlsbad2 violations$31810FLSA
Apr 9, 2012Apr 2010 to Apr 2012Carlsbad2 violations$68610FLSA
Apr 4, 2012Apr 2010 to Apr 2012Red Bluffno violations found000
Dec 15, 2010Dec 2008 to Dec 2010Sacramento1 violation000FLSA
Dec 15, 2010Dec 2008 to Dec 2010Sacramento1 violation000FLSA
Jan 15, 2010Jan 2008 to Jan 2010Salinas14 violations00$6,792FLSA, child labor
Jul 21, 2009Jul 2007 to Jul 2009Bloomington1 violation$5110FLSA
Jun 30, 2009Aug 2008 to Jun 2009Livermore7 violations$4,19760FLSA
May 5, 2009May 2007 to May 2009Santa Ana16 violations$3,085160FLSA
Feb 3, 2009Oct 2008 to Feb 2009Redlands3 violations000FLSA, child labor
Dec 10, 2008Jan 2008 to Dec 2008Clearlake3 violations$23520FLSA, child labor
Dec 1, 2008Jan 2008 to Dec 2008Lakeport7 violations$56140FLSA
Dec 1, 2008Jan 2008 to Dec 2008Clearlake2 violations$25620FLSA
Mar 25, 2008Mar 2006 to Mar 2008Modesto9 violations$2,45790FLSA
Feb 7, 2008Feb 2006 to Feb 2008Sanger7 violations$45750FLSA
Feb 7, 2008Feb 2006 to Feb 2008Dinuba5 violations$38230FLSA
Dec 19, 2007Dec 2005 to Dec 2007Fairfield6 violations$1,76550FLSA
Nov 29, 2007Nov 2005 to Nov 2007Hollister11 violations00$10,188child labor
Aug 13, 2007Aug 2005 to Aug 2007Whittierno violations found000
Aug 14, 2006Aug 2004 to Aug 2006Antelope3 violations00$2,970child labor
Apr 24, 2006Apr 2004 to Apr 2006Sacramento6 violations$2203$693FLSA, child labor
Apr 12, 2006Apr 2004 to Apr 2006San Joseno violations found000
Mar 2, 2006Mar 2004 to Mar 2006Lakewood4 violations000child labor
Aug 10, 2005Aug 2003 to Aug 2005Carmichael5 violations$2,3042$693FLSA, child labor
Jun 21, 2005Jun 2003 to Jun 2005Grass Valley11 violations00$4,262child labor
Feb 14, 2005Aug 2003 to Feb 2005Fresno3 violations$1,18310FLSA, child labor
Feb 8, 2005Feb 2003 to Feb 2005Citrus Heights2 violations00$1,485child labor
Feb 4, 2005Jan 2004 to Feb 2005Fair Oaks3 violations00$693FLSA, child labor
Nov 2, 2004Nov 2002 to Nov 2004Azusano violations found000
Sep 22, 2004Sep 2002 to Sep 2004Elk Groveno violations found000

Also filed as: Frank J. Bandaccari; AN Subs Inc.; Littal, Inc.; Best Food, Inc.; Keith R and Karen Miller; Surjit Singh; Pannu Enterprise, Inc.; Subway #6666 Inc.; Indigo Developments. Inc.; L. P. Enterprises; Ajay Beri Corp.; K & S Subway, Karan Enterprises, K & P Subway.

Local pages: Los Angeles employment lawyer, San Diego employment lawyer.

How to read this record

Each row is one federal investigation. Period investigated is the span of payroll the Division reviewed, usually two years back from the complaint. Back wages is what the employer agreed to pay for that period at the federal rate; penalties went to the government, not to workers.

Back wages computed under the federal law are usually a fraction of the California number for the same hours: the state minimum is $16.90 in 2026, overtime starts after 8 hours in a day, and each missed meal or rest period adds an hour of pay. Workers paid in these cases may still be owed that difference, and the federal release form covers only the federal claim.

Full explainer: what a Labor Department case is, and what it is not.

If you work, or worked, at Subway

Pull together your pay stubs and your own record of hours for the last three years, request your pay records in writing (the employer has 21 days under Labor Code 226), and keep any WH-58 receipt from a Labor Department payment. A free review tells you in one call whether the California numbers exceed what was paid, whether break premiums and waiting time penalties apply, and whether anything that happened after you complained counts as retaliation. Call (800) 371-3088 or send your stubs.

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division enforcement database, California cases. Record last checked Oct 30, 2026. Back to the wage theft tracker.

About this data: Cases come from the U.S. Department of Labor Wage and Hour Division enforcement database (WHD compliance actions concluded since fiscal year 2005, California employers only), published by the Department of Labor and reloaded here every month. "Back wages" are amounts the employer agreed to pay at the close of the investigation; "penalties" are civil money penalties assessed. An investigation that found no violation is listed as such. The database does not include California Labor Commissioner cases or private lawsuits. This page is general information, not legal advice about your situation.

Talk to a California employment lawyer today.

Free, confidential consultation. We represent employees only, never employers.