Kaiser Permanente wage and hour record at a glance
Kaiser Permanente appears in 31 concluded Wage and Hour Division investigations in California, closed between Aug 31, 2004 and Apr 6, 2025. 18 of them found violations, 1,714 in all, and the employer agreed to pay $1,697,338 in back wages to 1,685 workers, with no civil money penalty assessed. Of the back wages, $1,695,986 was unpaid overtime and $1,351 unpaid minimum wage under the federal standard. The largest single case closed Nov 25, 2006 in Oakland with $1,165,132 for 981 workers. That places the employer at #21 of 23,910 California employers in the database by back wages.
Industry as coded by the Division: Local Hospitals; General Medical and Surgical Hospitals; All Other Health and Personal Care Stores. Laws involved: FMLA, FLSA.
Every case, newest first
| Case closed | Period investigated | City | Findings | Back wages | Workers paid | Penalties | Laws |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2025 | Jan 2025 to Apr 2025 | Riverside | 2 violations | 0 | 0 | 0 | FMLA |
| Dec 21, 2022 | Dec 2020 to Dec 2022 | Livermore | 3 violations | 0 | 0 | 0 | FMLA |
| Aug 26, 2019 | Aug 2017 to Aug 2019 | Santa Clara | no violations found | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| May 31, 2019 | May 2017 to May 2019 | Richmond | 3 violations | 0 | 0 | 0 | FMLA |
| Dec 17, 2018 | Mar 2018 to Dec 2018 | Selma | no violations found | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| May 10, 2018 | May 2016 to May 2018 | Panorama City | no violations found | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Oct 13, 2017 | Sep 2017 to Oct 2017 | Livermore | 1 violation | 0 | 0 | 0 | FMLA |
| May 3, 2016 | May 2015 to May 2016 | Los Angeles | no violations found | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Jan 28, 2016 | Jan 2014 to Jan 2016 | Corona | 2 violations | 0 | 0 | 0 | FMLA |
| Nov 5, 2015 | Nov 2013 to Nov 2015 | Los Angeles | 3 violations | 0 | 0 | 0 | FMLA |
| Sep 4, 2015 | Aug 2015 to Sep 2015 | Anaheim | no violations found | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Jan 16, 2015 | Jan 2013 to Jan 2015 | Santa Clara | no violations found | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| May 6, 2014 | May 2012 to May 2014 | Corona | no violations found | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Feb 10, 2014 | Feb 2012 to Feb 2014 | Oakland | no violations found | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Jun 24, 2013 | May 2012 to Jun 2013 | San Francisco | 1 violation | 0 | 0 | 0 | FLSA |
| Apr 15, 2012 | Apr 2010 to Apr 2012 | Oakland | 1 violation | 0 | 0 | 0 | FMLA |
| Feb 24, 2012 | Feb 2010 to Feb 2012 | Pleasanton | no violations found | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Oct 19, 2011 | Oct 2009 to Oct 2011 | Antioch | 2 violations | 0 | 0 | 0 | FMLA |
| Oct 5, 2011 | Oct 2009 to Oct 2011 | Oakland | no violations found | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Apr 20, 2011 | Apr 2009 to Apr 2011 | Roseville | no violations found | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Apr 27, 2009 | Apr 2007 to Apr 2009 | Valencia | no violations found | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| May 31, 2008 | Apr 2008 to May 2008 | Los Angeles | 3 violations | $6,544 | 1 | 0 | FLSA |
| Mar 28, 2008 | Apr 2007 to Mar 2008 | Sacramento | 1 violation | 0 | 0 | 0 | FMLA |
| Dec 10, 2007 | Oct 2007 to Dec 2007 | Woodland Hills | no violations found | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Nov 20, 2007 | Nov 2005 to Nov 2007 | San Francisco | 2 violations | 0 | 0 | 0 | FMLA |
| May 22, 2007 | May 2005 to May 2007 | Walnut Creek | 1 violation | 0 | 0 | 0 | FMLA |
| Nov 25, 2006 | May 2004 to Nov 2006 | Oakland | 982 violations | $1,165,132 | 981 | 0 | FLSA |
| Jan 5, 2006 | Jan 2004 to Jan 2006 | Martinez | 2 violations | $4,970 | 2 | 0 | FLSA |
| Sep 1, 2005 | Sep 2003 to Sep 2005 | Hayward | 2 violations | 0 | 0 | 0 | FLSA |
| Aug 7, 2005 | Jan 2004 to Aug 2005 | Oakland | 701 violations | $520,692 | 701 | 0 | FLSA |
| Aug 31, 2004 | Aug 2003 to Aug 2004 | Santa Clara | 2 violations | 0 | 0 | 0 | FMLA |
Also filed as: Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.; Kaiser Permanente (FLSA); Kaiser Foundation Hospitals; Kaiser Permanente Inc.; Kaiser Foundations Hospital; Kaiser Permanante; Kaiser Permanente Information Technology; Kaiser Permanente LLC; Kaiser Permanente - Santa Clara; Kaiser Permanente - Corona; Southern California Permanente Medical Group; The Permanente Medical Group, Inc.
Local pages: Riverside employment lawyer, Santa Clara employment lawyer.
How to read this record
Each row is one federal investigation. Period investigated is the span of payroll the Division reviewed, usually two years back from the complaint. Back wages is what the employer agreed to pay for that period at the federal rate; penalties went to the government, not to workers.
Back wages computed under the federal law are usually a fraction of the California number for the same hours: the state minimum is $16.90 in 2026, overtime starts after 8 hours in a day, and each missed meal or rest period adds an hour of pay. Workers paid in these cases may still be owed that difference, and the federal release form covers only the federal claim.
Full explainer: what a Labor Department case is, and what it is not.
If you work, or worked, at Kaiser Permanente
Pull together your pay stubs and your own record of hours for the last three years, request your pay records in writing (the employer has 21 days under Labor Code 226), and keep any WH-58 receipt from a Labor Department payment. A free review tells you in one call whether the California numbers exceed what was paid, whether break premiums and waiting time penalties apply, and whether anything that happened after you complained counts as retaliation. Call (800) 371-3088 or send your stubs.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division enforcement database, California cases. Record last checked Oct 30, 2026. Back to the wage theft tracker.
About this data: Cases come from the U.S. Department of Labor Wage and Hour Division enforcement database (WHD compliance actions concluded since fiscal year 2005, California employers only), published by the Department of Labor and reloaded here every month. "Back wages" are amounts the employer agreed to pay at the close of the investigation; "penalties" are civil money penalties assessed. An investigation that found no violation is listed as such. The database does not include California Labor Commissioner cases or private lawsuits. This page is general information, not legal advice about your situation.