Edick & Watt, Inc. safety record at a glance
Edick & Watt, Inc. has been the subject of 9 Cal/OSHA inspections in California since 2000, opened between Jan 26, 2000 and May 11, 2009. 7 of them were planned inspections. 1 of them produced citations, 3 in all: 1 serious. Inspectors proposed $675 in penalties; after appeals and settlements the current total is $540. The largest single penalty, $540, came from an inspection opened Jan 26, 2000 in El Cajon. That places the employer at #64,591 of 122,854 California employers in the database by penalties.
Industry as coded by the inspecting office: Construction. Worksites in Big Bear Lake, Murrieta, Ramona, San Marcos, San Diego, Escondido, El Cajon.
Every inspection, newest first
Click a date for the citations in that inspection.
| Opened | City | Why | Result | Proposed | Penalty | Closed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2009 | Big Bear Lake | Planned | no citations | 0 | 0 | May 12, 2009 |
| Oct 8, 2008 | Murrieta | Programmed related | no citations | 0 | 0 | Oct 14, 2008 |
| Feb 6, 2007 | Ramona | Planned | no citations | 0 | 0 | Feb 7, 2007 |
| Sep 11, 2006 | Ramona | Planned | no citations | 0 | 0 | Sep 12, 2006 |
| Jan 11, 2006 | San Marcos | Planned | no citations | 0 | 0 | Jan 11, 2006 |
| Feb 17, 2005 | San Marcos | Complaint | no citations | 0 | 0 | Mar 23, 2005 |
| May 17, 2004 | San Diego | Planned | no citations | 0 | 0 | Jul 7, 2004 |
| Jul 17, 2001 | Escondido | Planned | no inspection made | 0 | 0 | Jul 19, 2001 |
| Jan 26, 2000 | El Cajon | Planned | 3 citations 1 serious | $675 | $540 | Sep 19, 2000 |
Also recorded as: Edick and Watt Inc; Edick & Watt; Edick & Watt, Inc; Edick & Watt Inc; Edick and Watt, Inc.
The rules this employer was cited under
- 8 CCR 1926.652: 1 citation, 1 serious, $375
- 8 CCR 1926.100: 1 citation, $165
- 8 CCR 1926.651: 1 citation
Local pages: Murrieta employment lawyer.
How to read this record
Each row is one inspection by Cal/OSHA (or, rarely, federal OSHA) of one worksite. Why is the reason it was opened. Proposed is the penalty the inspector assessed; penalty is the current figure after any appeal or settlement. "Serious" means a realistic possibility of death or serious harm; "willful" and "repeat" carry penalties up to $162,851 each.
Citations document that the employer was told, in writing, what the rule required and when. That knowledge is often the center of a retaliation case: a worker who complained about the hazard an inspector later cited, and was then fired or cut, has a Labor Code 6310 claim, with lost wages and attorney's fees.
Full explainer: how to read a Cal/OSHA record.
If you work, or worked, at Edick & Watt, Inc.
Write down what you reported, to whom and when, and what changed afterward: shifts, pay, duties, write-ups. Request the inspection file from the Cal/OSHA district office using the activity number on the inspection page. An injury goes through workers' compensation; a firing, demotion or threat after a safety complaint or injury report is an employment claim with a one-year deadline at the Labor Commissioner (Labor Code 6310) and a longer one in court. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088 or send what you have.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, California inspections. Record last checked Nov 1, 2026. Back to the safety tracker.
About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.