What happened in this inspection
Cal/OSHA opened a planned inspection of Balian Ice Cream CO Inc at 2916 E Olympic BLVD, Los Angeles (Los Angeles County) on Mar 17, 2004. It was a complete inspection of the worksite focused on safety hazards. 25 employees were recorded at the site, with union representation. Inspectors issued 17 citations (7 serious) and proposed $33,760 in penalties; the current total is $14,390. The case closed on Mar 27, 2013.
Citations
Each citation names the rule, its classification and the penalty as proposed and as it stands now.
Issued May 24, 2004. Proposed $225, current $150. 4 instances. 1 workers exposed. Abatement due Jun 23, 2004, completed. Read the rule.
Issued May 24, 2004. Proposed $225, current $0. 1 workers exposed. Abatement due Jun 23, 2004, completed. Read the rule.
Issued May 24, 2004. Proposed $225, current $0. 1 workers exposed. Abatement due Jun 23, 2004, completed. Read the rule.
Issued May 24, 2004. Proposed $250, current $165. 2 instances. 1 workers exposed. Abatement due Jun 23, 2004, completed. Read the rule.
Issued May 24, 2004. Proposed $110, current $75. 3 workers exposed. Abatement due Jun 23, 2004, completed. Read the rule.
Issued May 24, 2004. Proposed $335, current $225. 6 instances. 25 workers exposed. Abatement due Jun 23, 2004, completed. Read the rule.
Issued May 24, 2004. Proposed $225, current $0. 3 instances. 2 workers exposed. Abatement due Jun 23, 2004, completed. Read the rule.
Issued May 24, 2004. Proposed $250, current $165. 2 instances. 3 workers exposed. Abatement due Jun 23, 2004, completed. Read the rule.
Issued May 24, 2004. Proposed $250, current $0. 3 instances. 3 workers exposed. Abatement due Jun 23, 2004, completed. Read the rule.
Issued May 24, 2004. Proposed $165, current $110. 3 workers exposed. Abatement due Jun 23, 2004, completed. Read the rule.
Issued May 24, 2004. Proposed $3,150, current $1,350. 2 instances. 1 workers exposed. Abatement due May 31, 2004, completed. Read the rule.
Issued May 24, 2004. Proposed $6,300, current $2,700. 3 instances. 1 workers exposed. Abatement due May 31, 2004, completed. Read the rule.
Issued May 24, 2004. Proposed $3,150, current $1,350. 7 instances. 1 workers exposed. Abatement due May 31, 2004, completed. Read the rule.
Issued May 24, 2004. Proposed $7,875, current $3,375. 10 instances. 1 workers exposed. Abatement due May 31, 2004, completed. Read the rule.
Issued May 24, 2004. Proposed $4,725, current $2,025. 13 instances. 1 workers exposed. Abatement due May 31, 2004, completed. Read the rule.
Issued May 24, 2004. Proposed $3,150, current $1,350. 3 instances. 1 workers exposed. Abatement due May 31, 2004, completed. Read the rule.
Issued May 24, 2004. Proposed $3,150, current $1,350. 1 workers exposed. Abatement due May 31, 2004, completed. Read the rule.
Your rights
If you worked at this site, the inspection file is a public record once the case closes; request it from the Cal/OSHA district office with activity number 301278941. A worker who reported the hazard, the injury or the inspection and was then fired, demoted or cut has a retaliation claim under Labor Code 6310, one year to file with the Labor Commissioner and longer to sue. Injuries themselves go through workers' compensation. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, inspection 301278941, checked Nov 1, 2026. How to read a record. Back to the safety tracker.
About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.