Pipejacking Unlimited safety record at a glance
Pipejacking Unlimited has been the subject of 50 Cal/OSHA inspections in California since 2000, opened between Sep 18, 2000 and Mar 10, 2011. 47 of them were planned inspections. 3 of them produced citations, 12 in all: 5 serious. Inspectors proposed $19,135 in penalties; after appeals and settlements the current total is $12,350. The largest single penalty, $10,500, came from an inspection opened Jun 12, 2001 in Pico Rivera. That places the employer at #12,652 of 122,854 California employers in the database by penalties.
Industry as coded by the inspecting office: Construction; Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction. Worksites in Murrieta, Temecula, Los Angeles, Lancaster, Riverside, Perris, Lake Elsinore, Chino.
Every inspection, newest first
Click a date for the citations in that inspection.
| Opened | City | Why | Result | Proposed | Penalty | Closed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2011 | Murrieta | Planned | no citations | 0 | 0 | Mar 15, 2011 |
| Dec 27, 2010 | Temecula | Planned | no citations | 0 | 0 | Jan 13, 2011 |
| Dec 17, 2010 | Temecula | Planned | no inspection made | 0 | 0 | Dec 28, 2010 |
| Aug 12, 2010 | Los Angeles | Planned | no inspection made | 0 | 0 | Aug 12, 2010 |
| Mar 29, 2010 | Los Angeles | Planned | no inspection made | 0 | 0 | Apr 5, 2010 |
| Aug 11, 2008 | Los Angeles | Planned | no inspection made | 0 | 0 | Aug 11, 2008 |
| May 8, 2008 | Lancaster | Planned | no citations | 0 | 0 | Jun 11, 2008 |
| May 2, 2008 | Riverside | Planned | no inspection made | 0 | 0 | May 6, 2008 |
| May 2, 2008 | Lancaster | Planned | no inspection made | 0 | 0 | May 13, 2008 |
| Apr 2, 2008 | Riverside | Planned | no inspection made | 0 | 0 | Apr 7, 2008 |
| Mar 4, 2008 | Los Angeles | Planned | 1 citation 1 serious | $3,035 | $1,350 | Feb 2, 2009 |
| Feb 29, 2008 | Los Angeles | Planned | no inspection made | 0 | 0 | Feb 29, 2008 |
| Mar 7, 2007 | Perris | Planned | no inspection made | 0 | 0 | Mar 9, 2007 |
| Jan 16, 2007 | Lake Elsinore | Planned | no inspection made | 0 | 0 | Jan 29, 2007 |
| Jan 9, 2007 | Murrieta | Planned | no inspection made | 0 | 0 | Jan 11, 2007 |
| Dec 12, 2006 | Temecula | Planned | no inspection made | 0 | 0 | Dec 13, 2006 |
| Sep 21, 2006 | Chino | Planned | no inspection made | 0 | 0 | Sep 21, 2006 |
| Aug 9, 2006 | Riverside | Planned | no inspection made | 0 | 0 | Aug 11, 2006 |
| Apr 26, 2006 | Riverside | Planned | no inspection made | 0 | 0 | Apr 27, 2006 |
| Mar 22, 2006 | El Segundo | Planned | no inspection made | 0 | 0 | Apr 17, 2006 |
| Feb 23, 2006 | El Segundo | Planned | no inspection made | 0 | 0 | Mar 1, 2006 |
| Nov 21, 2005 | Lancaster | Planned | no citations | 0 | 0 | Dec 19, 2005 |
| Nov 14, 2005 | Lancaster | Planned | no inspection made | 0 | 0 | Nov 18, 2005 |
| Oct 13, 2005 | Beaumont | Planned | no inspection made | 0 | 0 | Oct 13, 2005 |
| Oct 12, 2005 | Long Beach | Planned | no inspection made | 0 | 0 | Oct 17, 2005 |
| Sep 20, 2005 | Lancaster | Planned | no inspection made | 0 | 0 | Sep 23, 2005 |
| Jun 24, 2003 | Lancaster | Planned | no inspection made | 0 | 0 | Jun 24, 2003 |
| May 29, 2003 | Paramount | Planned | no inspection made | 0 | 0 | Jun 2, 2003 |
| Jan 14, 2003 | Lancaster | Planned | no inspection made | 0 | 0 | Jan 28, 2003 |
| Jan 8, 2003 | Paramount | Planned | no inspection made | 0 | 0 | Jan 10, 2003 |
| Jul 1, 2002 | Cerritos | Planned | no citations | 0 | 0 | Aug 15, 2002 |
| Jun 7, 2002 | Paramount | Planned | 2 citations | $500 | $500 | Jun 4, 2003 |
| Apr 16, 2002 | Cerritos | Planned | no citations | 0 | 0 | Apr 26, 2002 |
| Oct 24, 2001 | Pico Rivera | Planned | no inspection made | 0 | 0 | Oct 31, 2001 |
| Sep 25, 2001 | Pico Rivera | Planned | no citations | 0 | 0 | Oct 31, 2001 |
| Aug 28, 2001 | Pico Rivera | Planned | no inspection made | 0 | 0 | Sep 5, 2001 |
| Aug 17, 2001 | Pico Rivera | Planned | no inspection made | 0 | 0 | Aug 20, 2001 |
| Jul 25, 2001 | Lancaster | Planned | no inspection made | 0 | 0 | Aug 7, 2001 |
| Jul 20, 2001 | Pico Rivera | Planned | no inspection made | 0 | 0 | Jul 24, 2001 |
| Jun 12, 2001 | Pico Rivera | Planned | 9 citations 4 serious | $15,600 | $10,500 | Jul 21, 2005 |
| Jun 5, 2001 | Pico Rivera | Planned | no inspection made | 0 | 0 | Jul 2, 2001 |
| Apr 26, 2001 | Pico Rivera | Planned | no inspection made | 0 | 0 | May 1, 2001 |
| Apr 4, 2001 | Montebello | Planned | no citations | 0 | 0 | Apr 16, 2001 |
| Feb 27, 2001 | Montebello | Follow-up | no citations | 0 | 0 | Mar 1, 2001 |
| Feb 20, 2001 | Montebello | Planned | no inspection made | 0 | 0 | Feb 21, 2001 |
| Dec 20, 2000 | Pico Rivera | Follow-up | no inspection made | 0 | 0 | Dec 20, 2000 |
| Dec 14, 2000 | Pico Rivera | Planned | no citations | 0 | 0 | Dec 26, 2000 |
| Nov 29, 2000 | Pico Rivera | Planned | no inspection made | 0 | 0 | Dec 12, 2000 |
| Sep 18, 2000 | Bell Gardens | Follow-up | no citations | 0 | 0 | Sep 25, 2000 |
| Sep 18, 2000 | Bell Gardens | Planned | no inspection made | 0 | 0 | Sep 25, 2000 |
Also recorded as: Pipejacking Unlimited Inc; Pipejacking Unlimited, Inc.; Pipejacking Unlimited Inc.
The rules this employer was cited under
- 8 CCR 3328, Machinery and equipment, general: 3 citations, $300
- 8 CCR 5034: 2 citations, 2 serious, $900
- 8 CCR 8440: 2 citations, $500
- 8 CCR 5002: 1 citation, 1 serious, $4,500
- 8 CCR 5035: 1 citation, 1 serious, $4,500
- 8 CCR 8495: 1 citation, 1 serious, $1,350
- 8 CCR 5031: 1 citation, $150
- 8 CCR 4923: 1 citation, $150
Local pages: Murrieta employment lawyer, Temecula employment lawyer, Los Angeles employment lawyer.
How to read this record
Each row is one inspection by Cal/OSHA (or, rarely, federal OSHA) of one worksite. Why is the reason it was opened. Proposed is the penalty the inspector assessed; penalty is the current figure after any appeal or settlement. "Serious" means a realistic possibility of death or serious harm; "willful" and "repeat" carry penalties up to $162,851 each.
Citations document that the employer was told, in writing, what the rule required and when. That knowledge is often the center of a retaliation case: a worker who complained about the hazard an inspector later cited, and was then fired or cut, has a Labor Code 6310 claim, with lost wages and attorney's fees.
Full explainer: how to read a Cal/OSHA record.
If you work, or worked, at Pipejacking Unlimited
Write down what you reported, to whom and when, and what changed afterward: shifts, pay, duties, write-ups. Request the inspection file from the Cal/OSHA district office using the activity number on the inspection page. An injury goes through workers' compensation; a firing, demotion or threat after a safety complaint or injury report is an employment claim with a one-year deadline at the Labor Commissioner (Labor Code 6310) and a longer one in court. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088 or send what you have.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, California inspections. Record last checked Nov 1, 2026. Back to the safety tracker.
About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.