Employer record, Cal/OSHA and OSHA inspections

Mitchell Engineering Cal/OSHA Inspections and Citations

Benjamin Eghbali, Esq.Legal notes by Benjamin Eghbali, Esq.,

Mitchell Engineering: 36 inspections, 9 citations and $16,730 in penalties, latest opened Dec 6, 2016.

Every Cal/OSHA and federal OSHA inspection of a California workplace opened since 2000: 238,466 inspections of 122,854 employers, 447,188 citations, $586,238,760 in penalties, 5,717 deaths investigated.

Mitchell Engineering safety record at a glance

Mitchell Engineering has been the subject of 36 Cal/OSHA inspections in California since 2000, opened between Oct 19, 2000 and Dec 6, 2016. 29 of them were planned inspections. 7 of them produced citations, 9 in all: 1 serious. Inspectors proposed $19,920 in penalties; after appeals and settlements the current total is $16,730. The largest single penalty, $14,700, came from an inspection opened Mar 17, 2005 in San Francisco. That places the employer at #8,959 of 122,854 California employers in the database by penalties.

Industry as coded by the inspecting office: Construction. Worksites in San Francisco, Oroville, Shaver Lake, Belden, Placerville, Browns Valley, Sacramento, Hayward.

Every inspection, newest first

Click a date for the citations in that inspection.

OpenedCityWhyResultProposedPenaltyClosed
Dec 6, 2016San FranciscoComplaintno citations00Dec 30, 2016
Jan 4, 2010OrovillePlannedno citations00Jan 19, 2010
Dec 21, 2009OrovillePlannedno inspection made00Jan 6, 2010
Mar 9, 2009Shaver LakePlannedno citations00Mar 19, 2009
Jul 30, 2008Shaver LakePlanned1 citation$600$600Mar 24, 2009
Jun 24, 2008Shaver LakePlannedno inspection made00Jul 9, 2008
Mar 18, 2008BeldenPlannedno inspection made00Apr 1, 2008
Aug 8, 2007PlacervillePlannedno inspection made00Aug 9, 2007
Jul 9, 2007PlacervillePlannedno inspection made00Jul 13, 2007
Jun 6, 2007PlacervillePlannedno inspection made00Jun 14, 2007
Apr 17, 2007PlacervillePlannedno inspection made00Apr 24, 2007
Oct 18, 2006Browns ValleyPlannedno citations00Oct 24, 2006
Sep 14, 2006Browns ValleyPlanned2 citations$370$370Feb 24, 2009
Jul 25, 2006Browns ValleyPlannedno citations00Aug 4, 2006
May 31, 2006Browns ValleyPlannedno citations00Jun 15, 2006
May 11, 2006SacramentoComplaintno citations00Sep 19, 2006
Mar 2, 2006Browns ValleyPlanned1 citation$500$500May 21, 2007
Feb 10, 2006Browns ValleyPlannedno inspection made00Feb 22, 2006
Dec 9, 2005SacramentoAccidentno citations00Sep 6, 2006
Sep 15, 2005SacramentoPlannedno inspection made00Sep 29, 2005
Sep 7, 2005HaywardPlannedno inspection made00Sep 13, 2005
Aug 23, 2005HaywardPlannedno inspection made00Aug 30, 2005
Jul 25, 2005SacramentoPlannedno inspection made00Aug 8, 2005
Jul 21, 2005San FranciscoPlannedno inspection made00Jul 28, 2005
Jun 9, 2005San FranciscoPlannedno inspection made00Jun 9, 2005
Mar 17, 2005San FranciscoAccident2 citations 1 serious$16,200$14,700Dec 31, 2008
Feb 28, 2005FremontProgrammed related1 citation00Apr 18, 2005
Sep 29, 2004ColfaxPlannedno inspection made00Oct 5, 2004
Jul 27, 2004Strawberry ValleyPlannedno inspection made00Aug 10, 2004
Mar 24, 2004San FranciscoPlannedno inspection made00Mar 30, 2004
Mar 11, 2004Big Oak FlatProgrammed relatedno citations00Apr 12, 2004
Oct 17, 2001San FranciscoUnprogrammed related1 citation$2,250$560Oct 17, 2001
Jan 17, 2001MoccasinPlannedno inspection made00Jan 29, 2001
Jan 17, 2001SunolPlannedno citations00Jan 26, 2001
Nov 3, 2000Big Oak FlatPlanned1 citation00Jan 8, 2001
Oct 19, 2000Buck MeadowsPlannedno inspection made00Oct 24, 2000

The rules this employer was cited under

Accidents investigated

Feb 16, 2005, San Francisco. Employee Struck by Falling Form 1 hospitalized Inspection

Local pages: San Francisco employment lawyer.

How to read this record

Each row is one inspection by Cal/OSHA (or, rarely, federal OSHA) of one worksite. Why is the reason it was opened. Proposed is the penalty the inspector assessed; penalty is the current figure after any appeal or settlement. "Serious" means a realistic possibility of death or serious harm; "willful" and "repeat" carry penalties up to $162,851 each.

Citations document that the employer was told, in writing, what the rule required and when. That knowledge is often the center of a retaliation case: a worker who complained about the hazard an inspector later cited, and was then fired or cut, has a Labor Code 6310 claim, with lost wages and attorney's fees.

Full explainer: how to read a Cal/OSHA record.

If you work, or worked, at Mitchell Engineering

Write down what you reported, to whom and when, and what changed afterward: shifts, pay, duties, write-ups. Request the inspection file from the Cal/OSHA district office using the activity number on the inspection page. An injury goes through workers' compensation; a firing, demotion or threat after a safety complaint or injury report is an employment claim with a one-year deadline at the Labor Commissioner (Labor Code 6310) and a longer one in court. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088 or send what you have.

Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, California inspections. Record last checked Nov 1, 2026. Back to the safety tracker.

About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.

Talk to a California employment lawyer today.

Free, confidential consultation. We represent employees only, never employers.