Ace Restoration and Waterproofing Inc safety record at a glance
Ace Restoration and Waterproofing Inc has been the subject of 7 Cal/OSHA inspections in California since 2000, opened between Apr 19, 2001 and Oct 9, 2014. 6 of them were planned inspections. 3 of them produced citations, 8 in all: 2 serious. Inspectors proposed $2,135 in penalties; after appeals and settlements the current total is $2,135. The largest single penalty, $2,000, came from an inspection opened Apr 19, 2001 in San Diego. That places the employer at #39,144 of 122,854 California employers in the database by penalties.
Industry as coded by the inspecting office: Construction. Worksites in Kernville, Bakersfield, San Diego.
Every inspection, newest first
Click a date for the citations in that inspection.
| Opened | City | Why | Result | Proposed | Penalty | Closed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2014 | Kernville | Planned | 1 citation | $135 | $135 | Dec 22, 2015 |
| Jul 30, 2014 | Kernville | Planned | 1 citation | 0 | 0 | Sep 17, 2014 |
| Apr 24, 2014 | Kernville | Planned | no citations | 0 | 0 | Apr 24, 2014 |
| Aug 20, 2009 | Bakersfield | Planned | no inspection made | 0 | 0 | Aug 20, 2009 |
| Mar 20, 2008 | Bakersfield | Accident | no citations | 0 | 0 | May 7, 2008 |
| Jan 29, 2008 | Bakersfield | Planned | no citations | 0 | 0 | Jan 29, 2008 |
| Apr 19, 2001 | San Diego | Planned | 6 citations 2 serious | $2,000 | $2,000 | Jun 20, 2001 |
Also recorded as: Ace Restoration & Waterproofing Inc.; Ace Restoration & Waterproofing Inc.
The rules this employer was cited under
- 8 CCR 1910.134: 2 citations
- 8 CCR 1926.28: 1 citation, 1 serious, $750
- 8 CCR 1926.152: 1 citation, 1 serious, $750
- 8 CCR 1904.2: 1 citation, $500
- 8 CCR 8410: 1 citation, $135
- 8 CCR 1904.5: 1 citation
- 8 CCR 8445: 1 citation
Accidents investigated
Local pages: Bakersfield employment lawyer, San Diego employment lawyer.
How to read this record
Each row is one inspection by Cal/OSHA (or, rarely, federal OSHA) of one worksite. Why is the reason it was opened. Proposed is the penalty the inspector assessed; penalty is the current figure after any appeal or settlement. "Serious" means a realistic possibility of death or serious harm; "willful" and "repeat" carry penalties up to $162,851 each.
Citations document that the employer was told, in writing, what the rule required and when. That knowledge is often the center of a retaliation case: a worker who complained about the hazard an inspector later cited, and was then fired or cut, has a Labor Code 6310 claim, with lost wages and attorney's fees.
Full explainer: how to read a Cal/OSHA record.
If you work, or worked, at Ace Restoration and Waterproofing Inc
Write down what you reported, to whom and when, and what changed afterward: shifts, pay, duties, write-ups. Request the inspection file from the Cal/OSHA district office using the activity number on the inspection page. An injury goes through workers' compensation; a firing, demotion or threat after a safety complaint or injury report is an employment claim with a one-year deadline at the Labor Commissioner (Labor Code 6310) and a longer one in court. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088 or send what you have.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, California inspections. Record last checked Nov 1, 2026. Back to the safety tracker.
About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.