What happened in this inspection
Cal/OSHA opened a planned inspection of Global Plastics, Inc. at 353 E. Ellis Ave A, Perris (Riverside County) on Feb 7, 2017. It was a complete inspection of the worksite focused on safety hazards. 50 employees were recorded at the site. Inspectors issued 22 citations (9 serious) and proposed $80,135 in penalties; the current total is $26,250. The case closed on Dec 18, 2017. The employer has 6 other inspections on its California record.
Citations
Each citation names the rule, its classification and the penalty as proposed and as it stands now.
Issued Jun 13, 2017. Proposed $375, current $150. 2 workers exposed. Read the rule.
Issued Jun 13, 2017. Proposed $280, current $150. 2 instances. 3 workers exposed. Read the rule.
Issued Jun 13, 2017. Proposed $185, current $150. 5 workers exposed. Read the rule.
Issued Jun 13, 2017. Proposed $375, current $150. 1 workers exposed. Read the rule.
Issued Jun 13, 2017. Proposed $750, current $150. 3 instances. 5 workers exposed. Read the rule.
Issued Jun 13, 2017. Proposed $280, current $150. 50 workers exposed. Abatement due Jul 10, 2017, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jun 13, 2017. Proposed $420, current $150. 5 workers exposed. Read the rule.
Issued Jun 13, 2017. Proposed $560, current $150. 4 workers exposed. Abatement due Jul 10, 2017, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jun 13, 2017. Proposed $420, current $150. 4 workers exposed. Read the rule.
Issued Jun 13, 2017. Proposed $560, current $150. 3 workers exposed. Read the rule.
Issued Jun 13, 2017. Proposed $560, current $150. 4 workers exposed. Read the rule.
Issued Jun 13, 2017. Proposed $560, current $150. 5 workers exposed. Read the rule.
Issued Jun 13, 2017. Proposed $560, current $150. 2 instances. 2 workers exposed. Abatement due Jul 10, 2017, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jun 13, 2017. Proposed $9,000, current $2,700. 8 instances. 3 workers exposed. Read the rule.
Issued Jun 13, 2017. Proposed $6,750, current $2,700. 2 instances. 5 workers exposed. Read the rule.
Issued Jun 13, 2017. Proposed $9,000, current $2,700. 2 instances. 2 workers exposed. Read the rule.
Issued Jun 13, 2017. Proposed $11,250, current $2,700. 9 instances. 4 workers exposed. Read the rule.
Issued Jun 13, 2017. Proposed $4,500, current $2,700. 2 instances. 4 workers exposed. Read the rule.
Issued Jun 13, 2017. Proposed $9,000, current $2,700. 2 instances. 7 workers exposed. Read the rule.
Issued Jun 13, 2017. Proposed $11,250, current $2,700. 2 instances. 10 workers exposed. Read the rule.
Issued Jun 13, 2017. Proposed $6,750, current $2,700. 2 workers exposed. Read the rule.
Issued Jun 13, 2017. Proposed $6,750, current $2,700. 2 instances. 2 workers exposed. Read the rule.
Your rights
If you worked at this site, the inspection file is a public record once the case closes; request it from the Cal/OSHA district office with activity number 342097995. A worker who reported the hazard, the injury or the inspection and was then fired, demoted or cut has a retaliation claim under Labor Code 6310, one year to file with the Labor Commissioner and longer to sue. Injuries themselves go through workers' compensation. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, inspection 342097995, checked Nov 1, 2026. How to read a record. Back to the safety tracker.
About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.