What happened in this inspection
Cal/OSHA opened a complaint inspection of Bay Area Builders, Inc. at 1000 Glenn Dr., Folsom (Sacramento County) on Sep 23, 2016. It was a partial inspection focused on health hazards. 6 employees were recorded at the site. Inspectors issued 12 citations (1 serious) and proposed $12,835 in penalties; the current total is $10,725. 12 citations were contested before the Appeals Board. 2 citations were deleted on appeal and are not counted. The case closed on Jul 2, 2018. The employer has 3 other inspections on its California record.
Citations
Each citation names the rule, its classification and the penalty as proposed and as it stands now.
Issued Feb 27, 2017. Proposed $325, current $325. 6 workers exposed. Contested Mar 7, 2017, final order May 15, 2018. Abatement due Jul 12, 2018, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Feb 27, 2017. Proposed $650, current $650. 41 workers exposed. Contested Mar 7, 2017, final order May 15, 2018. Read the rule.
Issued Feb 27, 2017. Proposed $650, current $650. 6 instances. 1 workers exposed. Contested Mar 7, 2017, final order May 15, 2018. Abatement due Jul 20, 2018, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Feb 27, 2017. Proposed $810, current $650. 9 instances. 1 workers exposed. Contested Mar 7, 2017, final order May 15, 2018. Read the rule.
Issued Feb 27, 2017. Proposed $650, current $650. 6 workers exposed. Contested Mar 7, 2017, final order May 15, 2018. Abatement due Jul 20, 2018, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Feb 27, 2017. Proposed $650, current $650. 6 workers exposed. Contested Mar 7, 2017, final order May 15, 2018. Abatement due Aug 4, 2018, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Feb 27, 2017. Proposed $650, current $0. 6 workers exposed. Contested Mar 7, 2017, final order May 15, 2018. Read the rule.
Issued Feb 27, 2017. Proposed $650, current $0. 6 instances. 6 workers exposed. Contested Mar 7, 2017, final order May 15, 2018. Read the rule.
Issued Feb 27, 2017. Proposed $650, current $650. 6 workers exposed. Contested Mar 7, 2017, final order May 15, 2018. Read the rule.
Issued Feb 27, 2017. Proposed $650, current $650. 6 workers exposed. Contested Mar 7, 2017, final order May 15, 2018. Read the rule.
Issued Feb 27, 2017. Proposed $650, current $0. 6 workers exposed. Contested Mar 7, 2017, final order May 15, 2018. Read the rule.
Issued Feb 27, 2017. Proposed $5,850, current $5,850. 8 instances. 9 workers exposed. Contested Mar 7, 2017, final order May 15, 2018. Read the rule.
Issued Feb 27, 2017. Proposed $7,310, current $0. 14 instances. 9 workers exposed. Contested Mar 7, 2017, final order May 15, 2018. Read the rule.
Issued Feb 27, 2017. Proposed $5,850, current $0. 9 workers exposed. Contested Mar 7, 2017, final order May 15, 2018. Read the rule.
Your rights
If you worked at this site, the inspection file is a public record once the case closes; request it from the Cal/OSHA district office with activity number 341799328. A worker who reported the hazard, the injury or the inspection and was then fired, demoted or cut has a retaliation claim under Labor Code 6310, one year to file with the Labor Commissioner and longer to sue. Injuries themselves go through workers' compensation. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, inspection 341799328, checked Nov 1, 2026. How to read a record. Back to the safety tracker.
About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.