Inspection record, Sacramento

Jay Bryant Cal/OSHA Inspection, Apr 27, 2016

Benjamin Eghbali, Esq.Legal notes by Benjamin Eghbali, Esq.,

Complaint inspection in Sacramento: 7 citations, $1,870. One of 2 inspections on this employer's record.

Every Cal/OSHA and federal OSHA inspection of a California workplace opened since 2000: 238,466 inspections of 122,853 employers, 447,188 citations, $586,238,760 in penalties, 5,717 deaths investigated.

What happened in this inspection

Cal/OSHA opened a complaint inspection of Jay Bryant at 8581 Younger Creek Dr Suite 200, Sacramento (Sacramento County) on Apr 27, 2016. It was a partial inspection focused on health hazards. The record lists 7 employees, a figure the employer reports to the inspector and one that can cover more than the site inspected. Inspectors issued 7 citations (0 serious) and proposed $1,870 in penalties, which stands as the current total. The case closed on Jan 30, 2020. The employer has 1 other inspection on its California record.

Citations

Each citation names the rule, its classification and the penalty as proposed and as it stands now.

Citation 01001: 8 CCR 461(a), Permits to Operate General
Issued Jul 21, 2016. Proposed $250, current $250. 7 workers exposed. Abatement due Aug 2, 2016, completed. Failure to abate penalty $1,600. Read the rule.
Citation 01002: 8 CCR 2473.1(b), Conductors Entering Boxes, Cabinets, or Fittings General
Issued Jul 21, 2016. Proposed $185, current $185. 2 instances. 7 workers exposed. Abatement due Aug 2, 2016, completed. Read the rule.
Citation 01003: 8 CCR 3203(a), Injury and Illness Prevention Program General
Issued Jul 21, 2016. Proposed $375, current $375. 19 instances. 7 workers exposed. Abatement due Aug 2, 2016, completed. Read the rule.
Citation 01004: 8 CCR 3364(b), Sanitary facilities General
Issued Jul 21, 2016. Proposed $125, current $125. 7 workers exposed. Abatement due Aug 2, 2016, completed. Read the rule.
Citation 01005: 8 CCR 3380(f)(2), Personal protective equipment General
Issued Jul 21, 2016. Proposed $185, current $185. 7 workers exposed. Abatement due Aug 2, 2016, completed. Read the rule.
Citation 01006: 8 CCR 3650(t)(1), Industrial trucks, operating rules General
Issued Jul 21, 2016. Proposed $375, current $375. 7 instances. 7 workers exposed. Abatement due Aug 2, 2016, completed. Read the rule.
Citation 01007: 8 CCR 5194(e)(1), Hazard communication General
Issued Jul 21, 2016. Proposed $375, current $375. 7 instances. 7 workers exposed. Abatement due Aug 2, 2016, completed. Read the rule.

Your rights

If you worked at this site, the inspection file is a public record once the case closes; request it from the Cal/OSHA district office with activity number 341421147. A worker who reported the hazard, the injury or the inspection and was then fired, demoted or cut has a retaliation claim under Labor Code 6310, one year to file with the Labor Commissioner and longer to sue. Injuries themselves go through workers' compensation. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088.

Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, inspection 341421147, checked Nov 4, 2026. How to read a record. Back to the safety tracker.

About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.

Talk to a California employment lawyer today.

Free, confidential consultation. We represent employees only, never employers.