What happened in this inspection
Cal/OSHA opened a planned inspection of Crystal Pacific Window and Door System, Inc. at 1850 Atlanta Ave, Riverside (Riverside County) on Mar 11, 2016. It was a complete inspection of the worksite focused on safety hazards. 63 employees were recorded at the site. Inspectors issued 22 citations (5 serious) and proposed $42,345 in penalties; the current total is $21,060. The case closed on Feb 11, 2021. The employer has 2 other inspections on its California record.
Citations
Each citation names the rule, its classification and the penalty as proposed and as it stands now.
Issued Sep 6, 2016. Proposed $560, current $280. 1 workers exposed. Read the rule.
Issued Sep 6, 2016. Proposed $560, current $280. 1 workers exposed. Read the rule.
Issued Sep 6, 2016. Proposed $560, current $280. 1 workers exposed. Read the rule.
Issued Sep 6, 2016. Proposed $935, current $280. 1 workers exposed. Abatement due Sep 30, 2016, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Sep 6, 2016. Proposed $560, current $280. 10 workers exposed. Abatement due Sep 30, 2016, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Sep 6, 2016. Proposed $280, current $280. 10 workers exposed. Abatement due Sep 30, 2016, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Sep 6, 2016. Proposed $750, current $560. 1 workers exposed. Read the rule.
Issued Sep 6, 2016. Proposed $560, current $560. 1 workers exposed. Abatement due Sep 30, 2016, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Sep 6, 2016. Proposed $560, current $560. 2 workers exposed. Abatement due Sep 30, 2016, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Sep 6, 2016. Proposed $750, current $560. 1 workers exposed. Abatement due Sep 30, 2016, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Sep 6, 2016. Proposed $750, current $560. 2 workers exposed. Read the rule.
Issued Sep 6, 2016. Proposed $560, current $560. 1 workers exposed. Read the rule.
Issued Sep 6, 2016. Proposed $750, current $560. 1 workers exposed. Read the rule.
Issued Sep 6, 2016. Proposed $420, current $420. 1 workers exposed. Abatement due Sep 30, 2016, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Sep 6, 2016. Proposed $420, current $420. 1 workers exposed. Read the rule.
Issued Sep 6, 2016. Proposed $750, current $560. 1 workers exposed. Read the rule.
Issued Sep 6, 2016. Proposed $560, current $560. 1 workers exposed. Read the rule.
Issued Sep 6, 2016. Proposed $6,750, current $2,700. 3 workers exposed. Read the rule.
Issued Sep 6, 2016. Proposed $6,750, current $2,700. 1 workers exposed. Read the rule.
Issued Sep 6, 2016. Proposed $5,060, current $2,700. 1 workers exposed. Read the rule.
Issued Sep 6, 2016. Proposed $6,750, current $2,700. 3 workers exposed. Read the rule.
Issued Sep 6, 2016. Proposed $6,750, current $2,700. 1 workers exposed. Read the rule.
Your rights
If you worked at this site, the inspection file is a public record once the case closes; request it from the Cal/OSHA district office with activity number 341318681. A worker who reported the hazard, the injury or the inspection and was then fired, demoted or cut has a retaliation claim under Labor Code 6310, one year to file with the Labor Commissioner and longer to sue. Injuries themselves go through workers' compensation. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, inspection 341318681, checked Nov 1, 2026. How to read a record. Back to the safety tracker.
About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.