Inspection record, Ventura

National Park Service Channel Islands National Park Cal/OSHA Inspection, Apr 1, 2013

Benjamin Eghbali, Esq.Legal notes by Benjamin Eghbali, Esq.,

Planned inspection in Ventura: 20 citations, $0. One of 6 inspections on this employer's record.

Every Cal/OSHA and federal OSHA inspection of a California workplace opened since 2000: 238,466 inspections of 122,854 employers, 447,188 citations, $586,238,760 in penalties, 5,717 deaths investigated.

What happened in this inspection

Federal OSHA opened a planned inspection of National Park Service Channel Islands National Park at 1901 Spinnaker Drive, Ventura (Ventura County) on Apr 1, 2013. It was a complete inspection of the worksite focused on safety hazards. 18 employees were recorded at the site. The employer is a federal government body. Inspectors issued 20 citations (19 serious) and proposed $0 in penalties; the current total is $0. The case closed on Sep 17, 2013. The employer has 5 other inspections on its California record.

Citations

Each citation names the rule, its classification and the penalty as proposed and as it stands now.

Citation 01001: 29 CFR 1910.23(d)(1) Serious
Issued May 29, 2013. Proposed $0, current $0. 1 workers exposed. Abatement due Jun 24, 2013, completed. Read the rule.
Citation 01002: 29 CFR 1910.25(d)(1) Serious
Issued May 29, 2013. Proposed $0, current $0. 2 instances. 2 workers exposed. Abatement due Jun 24, 2013, completed. Read the rule.
Citation 01003: 29 CFR 1910.26(c)(2) Serious
Issued May 29, 2013. Proposed $0, current $0. 1 workers exposed. Abatement due Jun 24, 2013, completed. Read the rule.
Citation 01004: 29 CFR 1910.36(g)(2) Serious
Issued May 29, 2013. Proposed $0, current $0. 7 workers exposed. Abatement due Jun 24, 2013, completed. Read the rule.
Citation 01005: 29 CFR 1910.132(a) Serious
Issued May 29, 2013. Proposed $0, current $0. 2 instances. 1 workers exposed. Abatement due Jun 24, 2013, completed. Read the rule.
Citation 01006: 29 CFR 1910.157(c)(4) Serious
Issued May 29, 2013. Proposed $0, current $0. 2 workers exposed. Abatement due Jun 24, 2013, completed. Read the rule.
Citation 01007: 29 CFR 1910.157(e)(2) Serious
Issued May 29, 2013. Proposed $0, current $0. 8 instances. 18 workers exposed. Abatement due Jun 24, 2013, completed. Read the rule.
Citation 01008: 29 CFR 1910.159(c)(10) Serious
Issued May 29, 2013. Proposed $0, current $0. 2 instances. 8 workers exposed. Abatement due Jun 24, 2013, completed. Read the rule.
Citation 01009: 29 CFR 1910.176(b) Serious
Issued May 29, 2013. Proposed $0, current $0. 5 instances. 6 workers exposed. Abatement due Jun 24, 2013, completed. Read the rule.
Citation 01010: 29 CFR 1910.176(c) Serious
Issued May 29, 2013. Proposed $0, current $0. 3 instances. 3 workers exposed. Abatement due Jun 24, 2013, completed. Read the rule.
Citation 01011: 29 CFR 1910.212(a) Serious
Issued May 29, 2013. Proposed $0, current $0. 1 workers exposed. Abatement due Jun 24, 2013, completed. Read the rule.
Citation 01012: 29 CFR 1910.303(b)(1) Serious
Issued May 29, 2013. Proposed $0, current $0. 5 instances. 5 workers exposed. Abatement due Jun 24, 2013, completed. Read the rule.
Citation 01013: 29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2) Serious
Issued May 29, 2013. Proposed $0, current $0. 18 workers exposed. Abatement due Jun 24, 2013, completed. Read the rule.
Citation 01014: 29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1) Serious
Issued May 29, 2013. Proposed $0, current $0. 2 workers exposed. Abatement due Jun 24, 2013, completed. Read the rule.
Citation 01015: 29 CFR 1910.305(c)(4) Serious
Issued May 29, 2013. Proposed $0, current $0. 2 workers exposed. Abatement due Jun 24, 2013, completed. Read the rule.
Citation 01016: 29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1) Serious
Issued May 29, 2013. Proposed $0, current $0. 4 instances. 9 workers exposed. Abatement due Jun 24, 2013, completed. Read the rule.
Citation 01017: 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5) Serious
Issued May 29, 2013. Proposed $0, current $0. 12 workers exposed. Abatement due Jun 24, 2013, completed. Read the rule.
Citation 01018: 29 CFR 1917.44(d) Serious
Issued May 29, 2013. Proposed $0, current $0. 8 workers exposed. Abatement due Jun 24, 2013, completed. Read the rule.
Citation 01019: 29 CFR 1917.44(f) Serious
Issued May 29, 2013. Proposed $0, current $0. 8 workers exposed. Abatement due Jun 24, 2013, completed. Read the rule.
Citation 02001: 29 CFR 1960.66(d) General
Issued May 29, 2013. Proposed $0, current $0. 3 instances. 128 workers exposed. Abatement due Jun 24, 2013, completed. Read the rule.

Your rights

If you worked at this site, the inspection file is a public record once the case closes; request it from the Cal/OSHA district office with activity number 338990922. A worker who reported the hazard, the injury or the inspection and was then fired, demoted or cut has a retaliation claim under Labor Code 6310, one year to file with the Labor Commissioner and longer to sue. Injuries themselves go through workers' compensation. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088.

Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, inspection 338990922, checked Nov 1, 2026. How to read a record. Back to the safety tracker.

About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.

Talk to a California employment lawyer today.

Free, confidential consultation. We represent employees only, never employers.