What happened in this inspection
Federal OSHA opened an accident inspection of Campbell Certified Inc at 8480 Balboa Ave, San Diego (San Diego County) on Nov 2, 2012. It was a partial inspection focused on safety hazards. 4 employees were recorded at the site. Inspectors issued 11 citations (4 serious) and proposed $55,275 in penalties; the current total is $24,365. 11 citations were contested before the Appeals Board. The case closed on Oct 12, 2017. The employer has 5 other inspections on its California record.
Citations
Each citation names the rule, its classification and the penalty as proposed and as it stands now.
Issued Apr 8, 2013. Proposed $305, current $305. 3 instances. 60 workers exposed. Contested Apr 15, 2013, final order Oct 16, 2014. Abatement due May 11, 2013, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 8, 2013. Proposed $135, current $135. 4 workers exposed. Contested Apr 15, 2013, final order Oct 16, 2014. Abatement due May 11, 2013, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 8, 2013. Proposed $410, current $410. 4 instances. 4 workers exposed. Contested Apr 15, 2013, final order Oct 16, 2014. Abatement due Apr 25, 2013, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 8, 2013. Proposed $5,000, current $5,000. 60 workers exposed. Contested Apr 15, 2013, final order Oct 16, 2014. Abatement due Apr 11, 2013, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 8, 2013. Proposed $275, current $275. 60 workers exposed. Contested Apr 15, 2013, final order Oct 16, 2014. Abatement due May 11, 2013, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 8, 2013. Proposed $275, current $275. 5 instances. 60 workers exposed. Contested Apr 15, 2013, final order Oct 16, 2014. Abatement due Apr 25, 2013, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 8, 2013. Proposed $275, current $275. 60 workers exposed. Contested Apr 15, 2013, final order Oct 16, 2014. Abatement due Apr 11, 2013, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 8, 2013. Proposed $14,400, current $14,400. 1 workers exposed. Contested Apr 15, 2013, final order Oct 16, 2014. Abatement due Apr 11, 2013, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 8, 2013. Proposed $14,400, current $1,440. 2 workers exposed. Contested Apr 15, 2013, final order Oct 16, 2014. Abatement due Apr 11, 2013, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 8, 2013. Proposed $14,400, current $1,440. 2 workers exposed. Contested Apr 15, 2013, final order Oct 16, 2014. Abatement due Apr 25, 2013, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 8, 2013. Proposed $5,400, current $410. 3 instances. 3 workers exposed. Contested Apr 15, 2013, final order Oct 16, 2014. Abatement due Apr 25, 2013, completed. Read the rule.
The accident
Keywords: fracture,metal bar,steel beam,construction,steel connector,steel erection,fall,struck by,lost balance,foot 1 hospitalized
Your rights
If you worked at this site, the inspection file is a public record once the case closes; request it from the Cal/OSHA district office with activity number 315346700. A worker who reported the hazard, the injury or the inspection and was then fired, demoted or cut has a retaliation claim under Labor Code 6310, one year to file with the Labor Commissioner and longer to sue. Injuries themselves go through workers' compensation. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, inspection 315346700, checked Nov 1, 2026. How to read a record. Back to the safety tracker.
About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.