What happened in this inspection
Cal/OSHA opened a unprogrammed related inspection of Hewitt & Canfield Construction Inc at 14242 Burbank BLVD., Sherman Oaks (Los Angeles County) on Nov 22, 2006. It was a partial inspection focused on safety hazards. 50 employees were recorded at the site. Inspectors issued 12 citations (1 serious) and proposed $20,625 in penalties; the current total is $8,435. 11 citations were contested before the Appeals Board. The case closed on Aug 15, 2007. The employer has 2 other inspections on its California record.
Citations
Each citation names the rule, its classification and the penalty as proposed and as it stands now.
Issued Dec 18, 2006. Proposed $325, current $0. Contested Jan 11, 2007, final order May 8, 2007. Abatement due Dec 27, 2006, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Dec 18, 2006. Proposed $325, current $325. 1 workers exposed. Contested Jan 11, 2007, final order May 8, 2007. Abatement due Dec 29, 2006, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Dec 18, 2006. Proposed $325, current $0. 11 instances. Contested Jan 11, 2007, final order May 8, 2007. Abatement due Dec 29, 2006, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Dec 18, 2006. Proposed $160, current $160. 1 workers exposed. Abatement due Jan 23, 2007, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Dec 18, 2006. Proposed $160, current $160. 1 workers exposed. Contested Jan 11, 2007, final order May 8, 2007. Abatement due Nov 22, 2006, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Dec 18, 2006. Proposed $160, current $160. 3 instances. 1 workers exposed. Contested Jan 11, 2007, final order May 8, 2007. Abatement due Dec 27, 2006, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Dec 18, 2006. Proposed $485, current $160. 6 instances. 1 workers exposed. Contested Jan 11, 2007, final order May 8, 2007. Abatement due Dec 11, 2006, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Dec 18, 2006. Proposed $160, current $160. 1 workers exposed. Contested Jan 11, 2007, final order May 8, 2007. Abatement due Jan 3, 2007, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Dec 18, 2006. Proposed $975, current $160. 2 instances. 12 workers exposed. Contested Jan 11, 2007, final order May 8, 2007. Abatement due Nov 22, 2006, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Dec 18, 2006. Proposed $5,850, current $5,850. 2 instances. 1 workers exposed. Contested Jan 11, 2007, final order May 8, 2007. Abatement due Dec 11, 2006, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Dec 18, 2006. Proposed $5,850, current $650. 3 instances. 1 workers exposed. Contested Jan 11, 2007, final order May 8, 2007. Abatement due Dec 11, 2006, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Dec 18, 2006. Proposed $5,850, current $650. Contested Jan 11, 2007, final order May 8, 2007. Abatement due Dec 20, 2006, completed. Read the rule.
Your rights
If you worked at this site, the inspection file is a public record once the case closes; request it from the Cal/OSHA district office with activity number 310195250. A worker who reported the hazard, the injury or the inspection and was then fired, demoted or cut has a retaliation claim under Labor Code 6310, one year to file with the Labor Commissioner and longer to sue. Injuries themselves go through workers' compensation. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, inspection 310195250, checked Nov 1, 2026. How to read a record. Back to the safety tracker.
About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.