Inspection record, Santa Ana

Polishing Technologies Inc dba O C Metal Polishing Cal/OSHA Inspection, Oct 15, 2008

Benjamin Eghbali, Esq.Legal notes by Benjamin Eghbali, Esq.,

Complaint inspection in Santa Ana: 16 citations, $2,250. The employer's only inspection on record.

Every Cal/OSHA and federal OSHA inspection of a California workplace opened since 2000: 238,466 inspections of 122,854 employers, 447,188 citations, $586,238,760 in penalties, 5,717 deaths investigated.

What happened in this inspection

Cal/OSHA opened a complaint inspection of Polishing Technologies Inc dba O C Metal Polishing at 901 E 5th St, Santa Ana (Orange County) on Oct 15, 2008. It was a partial inspection focused on health hazards. 9 employees were recorded at the site. Inspectors issued 16 citations (2 serious) and proposed $4,435 in penalties; the current total is $2,250. 16 citations were contested before the Appeals Board. The case closed on Feb 17, 2011.

Citations

Each citation names the rule, its classification and the penalty as proposed and as it stands now.

Citation 01001: 8 CCR 3364 A, Sanitary facilities General
Issued Mar 25, 2009. Proposed $175, current $150. 9 workers exposed. Contested Apr 17, 2009, final order Sep 9, 2009. Abatement due Apr 27, 2009, completed. Read the rule.
Citation 01002: 8 CCR 461 A General
Issued Mar 25, 2009. Proposed $85, current $50. 9 workers exposed. Contested Apr 17, 2009, final order Sep 9, 2009. Abatement due Apr 27, 2009, completed. Read the rule.
Citation 01003: 8 CCR 2340.12(a) General
Issued Mar 25, 2009. Proposed $85, current $50. 9 workers exposed. Contested Apr 17, 2009, final order Sep 9, 2009. Abatement due Mar 30, 2009, completed. Read the rule.
Citation 01004: 8 CCR 3203 A, Injury and Illness Prevention Program General
Issued Mar 25, 2009. Proposed $0, current $0. 9 workers exposed. Contested Apr 17, 2009, final order Sep 9, 2009. Abatement due Apr 27, 2009, completed. Read the rule.
Citation 01005: 8 CCR 4237 A General
Issued Mar 25, 2009. Proposed $85, current $50. 10 instances. 3 workers exposed. Contested Apr 17, 2009, final order Sep 9, 2009. Abatement due Apr 27, 2009, completed. Read the rule.
Citation 01006: 8 CCR 4237 B General
Issued Mar 25, 2009. Proposed $85, current $0. 10 instances. 3 workers exposed. Contested Apr 17, 2009, final order Sep 9, 2009. Abatement due Apr 27, 2009, completed. Read the rule.
Citation 01007: 8 CCR 5097 A General
Issued Mar 25, 2009. Proposed $85, current $50. 4 workers exposed. Contested Apr 17, 2009, final order Sep 9, 2009. Abatement due Apr 27, 2009, completed. Read the rule.
Citation 01008: 8 CCR 5098 A General
Issued Mar 25, 2009. Proposed $85, current $0. 4 workers exposed. Contested Apr 17, 2009, final order Sep 9, 2009. Abatement due Apr 27, 2009, completed. Read the rule.
Citation 01009: 8 CCR 5099 A General
Issued Mar 25, 2009. Proposed $85, current $0. 4 workers exposed. Contested Apr 17, 2009, final order Sep 9, 2009. Abatement due Apr 27, 2009, completed. Read the rule.
Citation 01010: 8 CCR 5099 B General
Issued Mar 25, 2009. Proposed $85, current $50. 4 workers exposed. Contested Apr 17, 2009, final order Sep 9, 2009. Abatement due Apr 27, 2009, completed. Read the rule.
Citation 01011: 8 CCR 5144 C02 A, Respiratory protection General
Issued Mar 25, 2009. Proposed $130, current $0. 9 workers exposed. Contested Apr 17, 2009, final order Sep 9, 2009. Abatement due Apr 27, 2009, completed. Read the rule.
Citation 01012: 8 CCR 5144 C02 B, Respiratory protection General
Issued Mar 25, 2009. Proposed $130, current $0. 9 workers exposed. Contested Apr 17, 2009, final order Sep 9, 2009. Abatement due Apr 27, 2009, completed. Read the rule.
Citation 01013: 8 CCR 5194 E01, Hazard communication General
Issued Mar 25, 2009. Proposed $85, current $50. 9 workers exposed. Contested Apr 17, 2009, final order Sep 9, 2009. Abatement due Apr 27, 2009, completed. Read the rule.
Citation 01014: 8 CCR 5194 G08, Hazard communication General
Issued Mar 25, 2009. Proposed $85, current $0. 9 workers exposed. Contested Apr 17, 2009, final order Sep 9, 2009. Abatement due Mar 30, 2009, completed. Read the rule.
Citation 02001: 8 CCR 4070 A Serious
Issued Mar 25, 2009. Proposed $1,575, current $900. 3 workers exposed. Contested Apr 17, 2009, final order Sep 9, 2009. Abatement due Apr 11, 2009, completed. Read the rule.
Citation 03001: 8 CCR 5175 A Serious
Issued Mar 25, 2009. Proposed $1,575, current $900. 9 workers exposed. Contested Apr 17, 2009, final order Sep 9, 2009. Abatement due Apr 11, 2009, completed. Read the rule.

Your rights

If you worked at this site, the inspection file is a public record once the case closes; request it from the Cal/OSHA district office with activity number 309303469. A worker who reported the hazard, the injury or the inspection and was then fired, demoted or cut has a retaliation claim under Labor Code 6310, one year to file with the Labor Commissioner and longer to sue. Injuries themselves go through workers' compensation. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088.

Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, inspection 309303469, checked Nov 1, 2026. How to read a record. Back to the safety tracker.

About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.

Talk to a California employment lawyer today.

Free, confidential consultation. We represent employees only, never employers.