What happened in this inspection
Cal/OSHA opened a complaint inspection of Sarah Levi dba Apm & S at 17120 S Figueroa St, Gardena (Los Angeles County) on Mar 30, 2005. It was a complete inspection of the worksite focused on health hazards. 10 employees were recorded at the site. Inspectors issued 18 citations (6 serious) and proposed $31,280 in penalties; the current total is $31,280. The case is still open.
Citations
Each citation names the rule, its classification and the penalty as proposed and as it stands now.
Issued Jun 22, 2005. Proposed $175, current $175. Abatement due Jul 22, 2005, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jun 22, 2005. Proposed $175, current $175. Abatement due Jul 22, 2005, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jun 22, 2005. Proposed $85, current $85. 3 instances. 3 workers exposed. Abatement due Jul 22, 2005, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jun 22, 2005. Proposed $85, current $85. 2 workers exposed. Abatement due Jul 22, 2005, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jun 22, 2005. Proposed $130, current $130. 2 instances. 3 workers exposed. Abatement due Jul 22, 2005, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jun 22, 2005. Proposed $130, current $130. 2 instances. 3 workers exposed. Abatement due Jul 22, 2005, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jun 22, 2005. Proposed $130, current $130. 3 workers exposed. Abatement due Jul 22, 2005, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jun 22, 2005. Proposed $175, current $175. 10 workers exposed. Abatement due Jul 22, 2005, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jun 22, 2005. Proposed $85, current $85. 5 instances. 5 workers exposed. Abatement due Jul 22, 2005, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jun 22, 2005. Proposed $130, current $130. 2 instances. 2 workers exposed. Abatement due Jul 22, 2005, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jun 22, 2005. Proposed $85, current $85. 1 workers exposed. Abatement due Jul 22, 2005, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jun 22, 2005. Proposed $195, current $195. 5 workers exposed. Abatement due Jul 22, 2005, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jun 22, 2005. Proposed $5,400, current $5,400. 10 instances. 7 workers exposed. Abatement due Jun 29, 2005, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jun 22, 2005. Proposed $4,050, current $4,050. 3 workers exposed. Abatement due Jun 29, 2005, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jun 22, 2005. Proposed $2,700, current $2,700. 1 workers exposed. Abatement due Jun 29, 2005, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jun 22, 2005. Proposed $6,750, current $6,750. 6 instances. 8 workers exposed. Abatement due Jun 29, 2005, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jun 22, 2005. Proposed $4,050, current $4,050. 1 workers exposed. Abatement due Jun 29, 2005, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jun 22, 2005. Proposed $6,750, current $6,750. 14 instances. 14 workers exposed. Abatement due Jun 29, 2005, completed. Read the rule.
Your rights
If you worked at this site, the inspection file is a public record once the case closes; request it from the Cal/OSHA district office with activity number 301281184. A worker who reported the hazard, the injury or the inspection and was then fired, demoted or cut has a retaliation claim under Labor Code 6310, one year to file with the Labor Commissioner and longer to sue. Injuries themselves go through workers' compensation. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, inspection 301281184, checked Nov 1, 2026. How to read a record. Back to the safety tracker.
About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.