What happened in this inspection
Cal/OSHA opened a complaint inspection of Jack Van LE dba V S Construction CO. at 530-534 Valencia Street, San Francisco (San Francisco County) on Oct 17, 2003. It was a complete inspection of the worksite focused on health hazards. 3 employees were recorded at the site. Inspectors issued 16 citations (2 serious) and proposed $6,520 in penalties; the current total is $2,700. The case closed on Mar 29, 2005.
Citations
Each citation names the rule, its classification and the penalty as proposed and as it stands now.
Issued Dec 17, 2003. Proposed $85, current $50. 5 workers exposed. Abatement due Jan 19, 2004, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Dec 17, 2003. Proposed $85, current $50. 5 workers exposed. Abatement due Jan 19, 2004, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Dec 17, 2003. Proposed $130, current $75. 5 workers exposed. Abatement due Jan 9, 2004, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Dec 17, 2003. Proposed $175, current $0. 3 workers exposed. Abatement due Dec 22, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Dec 17, 2003. Proposed $175, current $0. 4 instances. 5 workers exposed. Abatement due Dec 22, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Dec 17, 2003. Proposed $85, current $0. 5 workers exposed. Abatement due Dec 22, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Dec 17, 2003. Proposed $260, current $0. 4 instances. 5 workers exposed. Abatement due Jan 19, 2004, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Dec 17, 2003. Proposed $175, current $0. 4 workers exposed. Abatement due Dec 22, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Dec 17, 2003. Proposed $175, current $0. 5 workers exposed. Abatement due Dec 22, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Dec 17, 2003. Proposed $260, current $0. 5 workers exposed. Abatement due Jan 19, 2004, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Dec 17, 2003. Proposed $175, current $0. 3 workers exposed. Abatement due Dec 22, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Dec 17, 2003. Proposed $175, current $0. 5 workers exposed. Abatement due Dec 22, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Dec 17, 2003. Proposed $435, current $250. 5 workers exposed. Abatement due Dec 22, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Dec 17, 2003. Proposed $130, current $75. 2 instances. 3 workers exposed. Abatement due Jan 19, 2004, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Dec 17, 2003. Proposed $2,000, current $2,000. 4 instances. 5 workers exposed. Abatement due Dec 22, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Dec 17, 2003. Proposed $2,000, current $200. 3 instances. 2 workers exposed. Abatement due Dec 22, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Your rights
If you worked at this site, the inspection file is a public record once the case closes; request it from the Cal/OSHA district office with activity number 300894086. A worker who reported the hazard, the injury or the inspection and was then fired, demoted or cut has a retaliation claim under Labor Code 6310, one year to file with the Labor Commissioner and longer to sue. Injuries themselves go through workers' compensation. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, inspection 300894086, checked Nov 1, 2026. How to read a record. Back to the safety tracker.
About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.