What happened in this inspection
Cal/OSHA opened an accident inspection of Detail A Studios, Inc. at 1070 Van Dyke Avenue, San Francisco (San Francisco County) on Apr 24, 2003. It was a partial inspection focused on safety hazards. 10 employees were recorded at the site. Inspectors issued 22 citations (5 serious) and proposed $6,560 in penalties; the current total is $6,560. 22 citations were contested before the Appeals Board. The case closed on Jun 23, 2005. The employer has 2 other inspections on its California record.
Citations
Each citation names the rule, its classification and the penalty as proposed and as it stands now.
Issued Jul 22, 2003. Proposed $5,000, current $5,000. 1 workers exposed. Contested Aug 12, 2003, final order Dec 16, 2004. Abatement due Jul 25, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 22, 2003. Proposed $50, current $50. 4 workers exposed. Contested Aug 12, 2003, final order Dec 16, 2004. Abatement due Jul 25, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 22, 2003. Proposed $50, current $50. 10 workers exposed. Contested Aug 12, 2003, final order Dec 16, 2004. Abatement due Jul 25, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 22, 2003. Proposed $0, current $0. 10 workers exposed. Contested Aug 12, 2003, final order Dec 16, 2004. Abatement due Jul 25, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 22, 2003. Proposed $0, current $0. 10 workers exposed. Contested Aug 12, 2003, final order Dec 16, 2004. Abatement due Jul 25, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 22, 2003. Proposed $100, current $100. 3 instances. 10 workers exposed. Contested Aug 12, 2003, final order Dec 16, 2004. Abatement due Jul 25, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 22, 2003. Proposed $0, current $0. 3 instances. 10 workers exposed. Contested Aug 12, 2003, final order Dec 16, 2004. Abatement due Jul 25, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 22, 2003. Proposed $0, current $0. 5 workers exposed. Contested Aug 12, 2003, final order Dec 16, 2004. Abatement due Jul 25, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 22, 2003. Proposed $50, current $50. 3 workers exposed. Contested Aug 12, 2003, final order Dec 16, 2004. Abatement due Jul 25, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 22, 2003. Proposed $0, current $0. 3 workers exposed. Contested Aug 12, 2003, final order Dec 16, 2004. Abatement due Jul 25, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 22, 2003. Proposed $50, current $50. 4 workers exposed. Contested Aug 12, 2003, final order Dec 16, 2004. Abatement due Jul 25, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 22, 2003. Proposed $0, current $0. 2 workers exposed. Contested Aug 12, 2003, final order Dec 16, 2004. Abatement due Jul 25, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 22, 2003. Proposed $0, current $0. 3 instances. 2 workers exposed. Contested Aug 12, 2003, final order Dec 16, 2004. Abatement due Jul 25, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 22, 2003. Proposed $0, current $0. 10 workers exposed. Contested Aug 12, 2003, final order Dec 16, 2004. Abatement due Jul 25, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 22, 2003. Proposed $0, current $0. 2 workers exposed. Contested Aug 12, 2003, final order Dec 16, 2004. Abatement due Jul 25, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 22, 2003. Proposed $0, current $0. 2 workers exposed. Contested Aug 12, 2003, final order Dec 16, 2004. Abatement due Jul 25, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 22, 2003. Proposed $0, current $0. 2 workers exposed. Contested Aug 12, 2003, final order Dec 16, 2004. Abatement due Jul 25, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 22, 2003. Proposed $900, current $900. 2 instances. 2 workers exposed. Contested Aug 12, 2003, final order Dec 16, 2004. Abatement due Jul 25, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 22, 2003. Proposed $90, current $90. 2 workers exposed. Contested Aug 12, 2003, final order Dec 16, 2004. Abatement due Jul 25, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 22, 2003. Proposed $90, current $90. 2 instances. 4 workers exposed. Contested Aug 12, 2003, final order Dec 16, 2004. Abatement due Jul 25, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 22, 2003. Proposed $90, current $90. 2 workers exposed. Contested Aug 12, 2003, final order Dec 16, 2004. Abatement due Jul 25, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 22, 2003. Proposed $90, current $90. 4 workers exposed. Contested Aug 12, 2003, final order Dec 16, 2004. Abatement due Jul 25, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
The accident
Keywords: amputated,finger,guard,milling machine 1 hospitalized
Your rights
If you worked at this site, the inspection file is a public record once the case closes; request it from the Cal/OSHA district office with activity number 300892833. A worker who reported the hazard, the injury or the inspection and was then fired, demoted or cut has a retaliation claim under Labor Code 6310, one year to file with the Labor Commissioner and longer to sue. Injuries themselves go through workers' compensation. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, inspection 300892833, checked Nov 1, 2026. How to read a record. Back to the safety tracker.
About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.