What happened in this inspection
Federal OSHA opened a unprogrammed related inspection of Paloma Avenue LLC at 1137 and 1145 Paloma Avenue, Burlingame (San Mateo County) on Aug 1, 2005. It was a partial inspection focused on safety hazards. 10 employees were recorded at the site. Inspectors issued 27 citations (7 serious) and proposed $29,575 in penalties; the current total is $29,575. 24 citations were contested before the Appeals Board. The case closed on Feb 25, 2019. The employer has 1 other inspection on its California record.
Citations
Each citation names the rule, its classification and the penalty as proposed and as it stands now.
Issued Jan 31, 2006. Proposed $1,200, current $1,200. 10 workers exposed. Abatement due Mar 5, 2006, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 31, 2006. Proposed $250, current $250. 1 workers exposed. Abatement due Mar 5, 2006, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 31, 2006. Proposed $250, current $250. 10 workers exposed. Abatement due Mar 5, 2006, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 31, 2006. Proposed $250, current $250. 10 workers exposed. Contested Apr 3, 2006, final order Nov 19, 2008. Abatement due Mar 5, 2006, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 31, 2006. Proposed $250, current $250. 10 workers exposed. Contested Apr 3, 2006, final order Nov 19, 2008. Abatement due Mar 5, 2006, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 31, 2006. Proposed $250, current $250. 10 workers exposed. Contested Apr 3, 2006, final order Nov 19, 2008. Abatement due Mar 5, 2006, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 31, 2006. Proposed $250, current $250. 10 workers exposed. Contested Apr 3, 2006, final order Nov 19, 2008. Abatement due Mar 5, 2006, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 31, 2006. Proposed $250, current $250. 10 workers exposed. Contested Apr 3, 2006, final order Nov 19, 2008. Abatement due Mar 5, 2006, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 31, 2006. Proposed $250, current $250. 10 workers exposed. Contested Apr 3, 2006, final order Nov 19, 2008. Abatement due Mar 5, 2006, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 31, 2006. Proposed $250, current $250. 10 workers exposed. Contested Apr 3, 2006, final order Nov 19, 2008. Abatement due Mar 5, 2006, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 31, 2006. Proposed $250, current $250. 10 workers exposed. Contested Apr 3, 2006, final order Nov 19, 2008. Abatement due Mar 5, 2006, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 31, 2006. Proposed $250, current $250. 10 workers exposed. Contested Apr 3, 2006, final order Nov 19, 2008. Abatement due Mar 5, 2006, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 31, 2006. Proposed $250, current $250. 10 workers exposed. Contested Apr 3, 2006, final order Nov 19, 2008. Abatement due Mar 5, 2006, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 31, 2006. Proposed $250, current $250. 10 workers exposed. Contested Apr 3, 2006, final order Nov 19, 2008. Abatement due Mar 5, 2006, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 31, 2006. Proposed $250, current $250. 5 workers exposed. Contested Apr 3, 2006, final order Nov 19, 2008. Abatement due Mar 5, 2006, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 31, 2006. Proposed $250, current $250. 10 workers exposed. Contested Apr 3, 2006, final order Nov 19, 2008. Abatement due Mar 5, 2006, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 31, 2006. Proposed $250, current $250. 10 workers exposed. Contested Apr 3, 2006, final order Nov 19, 2008. Abatement due Mar 5, 2006, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 31, 2006. Proposed $250, current $250. 10 workers exposed. Contested Apr 3, 2006, final order Nov 19, 2008. Abatement due Mar 5, 2006, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 31, 2006. Proposed $250, current $250. 10 workers exposed. Contested Apr 3, 2006, final order Nov 19, 2008. Abatement due Mar 5, 2006, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 31, 2006. Proposed $250, current $250. 10 workers exposed. Contested Apr 3, 2006, final order Nov 19, 2008. Abatement due Mar 5, 2006, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 31, 2006. Proposed $3,375, current $3,375. 10 workers exposed. Contested Apr 3, 2006, final order Nov 19, 2008. Abatement due Mar 5, 2006, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 31, 2006. Proposed $3,375, current $3,375. 10 workers exposed. Contested Apr 3, 2006, final order Nov 19, 2008. Abatement due Mar 5, 2006, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 31, 2006. Proposed $3,375, current $3,375. 10 workers exposed. Contested Apr 3, 2006, final order Nov 19, 2008. Abatement due Mar 5, 2006, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 31, 2006. Proposed $3,375, current $3,375. 2 instances. 10 workers exposed. Contested Apr 3, 2006, final order Nov 19, 2008. Abatement due Mar 5, 2006, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 31, 2006. Proposed $3,375, current $3,375. 10 workers exposed. Contested Apr 3, 2006, final order Nov 19, 2008. Abatement due Mar 5, 2006, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 30, 2006. Proposed $3,375, current $3,375. 10 workers exposed. Contested Apr 3, 2006, final order Nov 19, 2008. Abatement due Mar 4, 2006, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 31, 2006. Proposed $3,375, current $3,375. 2 instances. 10 workers exposed. Contested Apr 3, 2006, final order Nov 19, 2008. Abatement due Mar 5, 2006, completed. Read the rule.
Your rights
If you worked at this site, the inspection file is a public record once the case closes; request it from the Cal/OSHA district office with activity number 300844073. A worker who reported the hazard, the injury or the inspection and was then fired, demoted or cut has a retaliation claim under Labor Code 6310, one year to file with the Labor Commissioner and longer to sue. Injuries themselves go through workers' compensation. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, inspection 300844073, checked Nov 1, 2026. How to read a record. Back to the safety tracker.
About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.