What happened in this inspection
Cal/OSHA opened an accident inspection of Lsi Construction at 1063 Cypress Ave, Burbank (Los Angeles County) on Jun 29, 2004. It was a partial inspection focused on safety hazards. 4 employees were recorded at the site. Inspectors issued 10 citations (0 serious) and proposed $2,250 in penalties; the current total is $1,790. 5 citations were contested before the Appeals Board. 3 citations were deleted on appeal and are not counted. The case is still open. The employer has 2 other inspections on its California record.
Citations
Each citation names the rule, its classification and the penalty as proposed and as it stands now.
Issued Jul 13, 2004. Proposed $250, current $250. Abatement due Jul 19, 2004, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 13, 2004. Proposed $125, current $85. 3 workers exposed. Contested Aug 10, 2004, final order Nov 7, 2007. Abatement due Jul 23, 2004, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 13, 2004. Proposed $375, current $260. 2 workers exposed. Contested Aug 10, 2004, final order Nov 7, 2007. Abatement due Jul 21, 2004, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 13, 2004. Proposed $125, current $85. 2 instances. 2 workers exposed. Contested Aug 10, 2004, final order Nov 7, 2007. Abatement due Jul 21, 2004, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 13, 2004. Proposed $125, current $125. 2 workers exposed. Abatement due Jul 21, 2004, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 13, 2004. Proposed $125, current $125. 2 instances. 1 workers exposed. Abatement due Jul 21, 2004, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 13, 2004. Proposed $125, current $125. 1 workers exposed. Abatement due Jul 21, 2004, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 14, 2004. Proposed $125, current $85. 4 workers exposed. Contested Aug 10, 2004, final order Nov 7, 2007. Abatement due Jul 22, 2004, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 13, 2004. Proposed $750, current $525. 4 workers exposed. Contested Aug 10, 2004, final order Nov 7, 2007. Abatement due Jul 21, 2004, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 13, 2004. Proposed $125, current $125. 4 instances. 1 workers exposed. Abatement due Aug 13, 2004, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 13, 2004. Proposed $5,000, current $0. Contested Aug 10, 2004, final order Nov 7, 2007. Abatement due Jul 21, 2004, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 13, 2004. Proposed $10,800, current $0. 1 workers exposed. Contested Aug 10, 2004, final order Nov 7, 2007. Abatement due Jul 21, 2004, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 13, 2004. Proposed $10,800, current $0. 1 workers exposed. Contested Aug 10, 2004, final order Nov 7, 2007. Abatement due Jul 21, 2004, completed. Read the rule.
The accident
Keywords: rebar,uneven ground,ladder,construction,fall,sloping,slope,unguarded,puncture,unstable position 1 hospitalized
Your rights
If you worked at this site, the inspection file is a public record once the case closes; request it from the Cal/OSHA district office with activity number 300827490. A worker who reported the hazard, the injury or the inspection and was then fired, demoted or cut has a retaliation claim under Labor Code 6310, one year to file with the Labor Commissioner and longer to sue. Injuries themselves go through workers' compensation. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, inspection 300827490, checked Nov 1, 2026. How to read a record. Back to the safety tracker.
About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.