What happened in this inspection
Cal/OSHA opened a unprogrammed related inspection of Bonner Metal Processing at 6052 Industrial Wy., Ste. A, Livermore (Alameda County) on Oct 15, 2001. It was a complete inspection of the worksite focused on safety hazards. 10 employees were recorded at the site. Inspectors issued 11 citations (5 serious) and proposed $13,650 in penalties; the current total is $2,695. 11 citations were contested before the Appeals Board. 1 citation was deleted on appeal and is not counted. The case closed on Jun 28, 2004. The employer has 4 other inspections on its California record.
Citations
Each citation names the rule, its classification and the penalty as proposed and as it stands now.
Issued Mar 26, 2002. Proposed $250, current $0. 2 instances. 2 workers exposed. Contested Apr 5, 2002, final order Aug 12, 2003. Abatement due Apr 25, 2002, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Mar 26, 2002. Proposed $250, current $0. 2 workers exposed. Contested Apr 5, 2002, final order Aug 12, 2003. Abatement due Apr 25, 2002, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Mar 26, 2002. Proposed $185, current $0. 2 workers exposed. Contested Apr 5, 2002, final order Aug 12, 2003. Abatement due Apr 25, 2002, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Mar 26, 2002. Proposed $185, current $0. 2 workers exposed. Contested Apr 5, 2002, final order Aug 12, 2003. Abatement due Apr 25, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Mar 26, 2002. Proposed $125, current $50. 2 workers exposed. Contested Apr 5, 2002, final order Aug 12, 2003. Abatement due Apr 25, 2002, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Mar 26, 2002. Proposed $280, current $125. 6 instances. 2 workers exposed. Contested Apr 5, 2002, final order Aug 12, 2003. Abatement due Apr 25, 2002, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Mar 26, 2002. Proposed $2,250, current $900. 3 instances. 2 workers exposed. Contested Apr 5, 2002, final order Aug 12, 2003. Abatement due Apr 4, 2002, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Mar 26, 2002. Proposed $2,250, current $90. 2 workers exposed. Contested Apr 5, 2002, final order Aug 12, 2003. Abatement due Apr 4, 2002, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Mar 26, 2002. Proposed $2,250, current $90. 2 workers exposed. Contested Apr 5, 2002, final order Aug 12, 2003. Abatement due Apr 4, 2002, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Mar 26, 2002. Proposed $3,375, current $1,350. 9 instances. 2 workers exposed. Contested Apr 5, 2002, final order Aug 12, 2003. Abatement due Apr 4, 2002, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Mar 26, 2002. Proposed $2,250, current $90. 3 instances. 2 workers exposed. Contested Apr 5, 2002, final order Aug 12, 2003. Abatement due Apr 4, 2002, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 9, 2002. Proposed $250, current $0. 2 workers exposed. Abatement due Apr 25, 2002, completed. Read the rule.
Your rights
If you worked at this site, the inspection file is a public record once the case closes; request it from the Cal/OSHA district office with activity number 300736188. A worker who reported the hazard, the injury or the inspection and was then fired, demoted or cut has a retaliation claim under Labor Code 6310, one year to file with the Labor Commissioner and longer to sue. Injuries themselves go through workers' compensation. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, inspection 300736188, checked Nov 1, 2026. How to read a record. Back to the safety tracker.
About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.