What happened in this inspection
Cal/OSHA opened an accident inspection of Troy - CSL Lighting Inc at 14625 E. Clark Ave., Hacienda Heights (Los Angeles County) on Jun 25, 2003. It was a complete inspection of the worksite focused on safety hazards. 60 employees were recorded at the site. Inspectors issued 23 citations (8 serious) and proposed $48,100 in penalties; the current total is $28,790. 23 citations were contested before the Appeals Board. The case closed on Dec 28, 2006. The employer has 2 other inspections on its California record.
Citations
Each citation names the rule, its classification and the penalty as proposed and as it stands now.
Issued Jul 22, 2003. Proposed $275, current $0. 12 workers exposed. Contested Aug 8, 2003, final order Jan 23, 2006. Abatement due Aug 22, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 22, 2003. Proposed $550, current $400. 12 workers exposed. Contested Aug 8, 2003, final order Jan 23, 2006. Abatement due Jul 25, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 22, 2003. Proposed $550, current $400. 12 workers exposed. Contested Aug 8, 2003, final order Jan 23, 2006. Abatement due Aug 22, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 22, 2003. Proposed $550, current $0. 12 workers exposed. Contested Aug 8, 2003, final order Jan 23, 2006. Abatement due Aug 22, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 22, 2003. Proposed $550, current $400. 2 workers exposed. Contested Aug 8, 2003, final order Jan 23, 2006. Abatement due Aug 22, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 22, 2003. Proposed $550, current $0. 1 workers exposed. Contested Aug 8, 2003, final order Jan 23, 2006. Abatement due Jul 25, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 22, 2003. Proposed $205, current $0. 6 workers exposed. Contested Aug 8, 2003, final order Jan 23, 2006. Abatement due Aug 22, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 22, 2003. Proposed $205, current $0. 6 workers exposed. Contested Aug 8, 2003, final order Jan 23, 2006. Abatement due Aug 22, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 22, 2003. Proposed $205, current $0. 4 instances. 5 workers exposed. Contested Aug 8, 2003, final order Jan 23, 2006. Abatement due Aug 22, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 22, 2003. Proposed $205, current $0. 2 instances. 9 workers exposed. Contested Aug 8, 2003, final order Jan 23, 2006. Abatement due Aug 22, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 22, 2003. Proposed $205, current $0. 3 instances. 5 workers exposed. Contested Aug 8, 2003, final order Jan 23, 2006. Abatement due Aug 22, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 22, 2003. Proposed $205, current $0. 2 instances. 1 workers exposed. Contested Aug 8, 2003, final order Jan 23, 2006. Abatement due Aug 22, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 22, 2003. Proposed $205, current $150. 1 workers exposed. Contested Aug 8, 2003, final order Jan 23, 2006. Abatement due Aug 22, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 22, 2003. Proposed $5,000, current $5,000. 1 workers exposed. Contested Aug 8, 2003, final order Jan 23, 2006. Abatement due Aug 22, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 22, 2003. Proposed $3,710, current $1,800. 4 workers exposed. Contested Aug 8, 2003, final order Jan 23, 2006. Abatement due Aug 5, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 22, 2003. Proposed $3,710, current $300. 2 instances. 3 workers exposed. Contested Aug 8, 2003, final order Jan 23, 2006. Abatement due Aug 5, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 22, 2003. Proposed $3,710, current $180. 2 instances. 3 workers exposed. Contested Aug 8, 2003, final order Jan 23, 2006. Abatement due Aug 5, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 22, 2003. Proposed $370, current $180. 3 workers exposed. Contested Aug 8, 2003, final order Jan 23, 2006. Abatement due Aug 5, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 22, 2003. Proposed $3,710, current $1,800. 4 instances. 1 workers exposed. Contested Aug 8, 2003, final order Jan 23, 2006. Abatement due Aug 5, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 22, 2003. Proposed $370, current $180. 4 instances. 1 workers exposed. Contested Aug 8, 2003, final order Jan 23, 2006. Abatement due Aug 5, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 22, 2003. Proposed $3,710, current $1,800. 12 workers exposed. Contested Aug 8, 2003, final order Jan 23, 2006. Abatement due Aug 5, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 22, 2003. Proposed $4,950, current $1,800. 4 instances. 12 workers exposed. Contested Aug 8, 2003, final order Jan 23, 2006. Abatement due Aug 5, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jul 22, 2003. Proposed $14,400, current $14,400. 1 workers exposed. Contested Aug 8, 2003, final order Jan 23, 2006. Abatement due Aug 5, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
The accident
Keywords: amputated,finger,thumb,saw,blade,unguarded,table saw
Your rights
If you worked at this site, the inspection file is a public record once the case closes; request it from the Cal/OSHA district office with activity number 126087964. A worker who reported the hazard, the injury or the inspection and was then fired, demoted or cut has a retaliation claim under Labor Code 6310, one year to file with the Labor Commissioner and longer to sue. Injuries themselves go through workers' compensation. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, inspection 126087964, checked Nov 1, 2026. How to read a record. Back to the safety tracker.
About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.