What happened in this inspection
Cal/OSHA opened an accident inspection of Columbia Manufacturing Corp at 14400 S. San Pedro St., Gardena (Los Angeles County) on Apr 12, 2002. It was a partial inspection focused on safety hazards. 160 employees were recorded at the site, with union representation. Inspectors issued 12 citations (3 serious) and proposed $46,515 in penalties; the current total is $12,515. 12 citations were contested before the Appeals Board. The case closed on Sep 15, 2004. The employer has 3 other inspections on its California record.
Citations
Each citation names the rule, its classification and the penalty as proposed and as it stands now.
Issued Sep 18, 2002. Proposed $635, current $635. 160 workers exposed. Contested Apr 2, 2003, final order Jan 8, 2004. Abatement due Sep 30, 2002, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Sep 18, 2002. Proposed $850, current $85. 1 workers exposed. Contested Apr 2, 2003, final order Jan 8, 2004. Abatement due Sep 30, 2002, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Sep 18, 2002. Proposed $475, current $475. 1 workers exposed. Contested Apr 2, 2003, final order Jan 8, 2004. Abatement due Sep 30, 2002, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Sep 18, 2002. Proposed $635, current $635. 1 workers exposed. Contested Apr 2, 2003, final order Jan 8, 2004. Abatement due Sep 30, 2002, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Sep 18, 2002. Proposed $850, current $85. 1 workers exposed. Contested Apr 2, 2003, final order Jan 8, 2004. Abatement due Sep 30, 2002, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Sep 18, 2002. Proposed $850, current $85. 1 workers exposed. Contested Apr 2, 2003, final order Jan 8, 2004. Abatement due Sep 30, 2002, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Sep 18, 2002. Proposed $635, current $635. 1 workers exposed. Contested Apr 2, 2003, final order Jan 8, 2004. Abatement due Sep 30, 2002, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Sep 18, 2002. Proposed $635, current $635. 1 workers exposed. Contested Apr 2, 2003, final order Jan 8, 2004. Abatement due Sep 30, 2002, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Sep 18, 2002. Proposed $18,000, current $7,650. 2 workers exposed. Contested Apr 2, 2003, final order Jan 8, 2004. Abatement due Sep 30, 2002, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Sep 18, 2002. Proposed $7,650, current $65. 2 workers exposed. Contested Apr 2, 2003, final order Jan 8, 2004. Abatement due Sep 30, 2002, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Sep 18, 2002. Proposed $7,650, current $765. 2 workers exposed. Contested Apr 2, 2003, final order Jan 8, 2004. Abatement due Sep 30, 2002, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Sep 18, 2002. Proposed $7,650, current $765. 2 workers exposed. Contested Apr 2, 2003, final order Jan 8, 2004. Abatement due Sep 30, 2002, completed. Read the rule.
The accident
Keywords: amputated,finger,crushed,punch press,hand 1 hospitalized
Your rights
If you worked at this site, the inspection file is a public record once the case closes; request it from the Cal/OSHA district office with activity number 126058239. A worker who reported the hazard, the injury or the inspection and was then fired, demoted or cut has a retaliation claim under Labor Code 6310, one year to file with the Labor Commissioner and longer to sue. Injuries themselves go through workers' compensation. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, inspection 126058239, checked Nov 1, 2026. How to read a record. Back to the safety tracker.
About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.