What happened in this inspection
Cal/OSHA opened a planned inspection of Lee Kum Kee (USA) Foods Inc at 14841 E Don Julian Rd, City of Industry (Los Angeles County) on Sep 26, 2006. It was a complete inspection of the worksite focused on safety hazards. 135 employees were recorded at the site. Inspectors issued 14 citations (2 serious) and proposed $19,635 in penalties; the current total is $8,510. The case closed on Sep 28, 2010. The employer has 6 other inspections on its California record.
Citations
Each citation names the rule, its classification and the penalty as proposed and as it stands now.
Issued Jan 22, 2007. Proposed $280, current $225. 2 instances. 135 workers exposed. Abatement due Feb 21, 2007, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 22, 2007. Proposed $280, current $225. 135 workers exposed. Abatement due Feb 21, 2007, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 22, 2007. Proposed $280, current $225. 2 instances. 135 workers exposed. Abatement due Feb 21, 2007, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 22, 2007. Proposed $0, current $0. 3 instances. 135 workers exposed. Abatement due Feb 21, 2007, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 22, 2007. Proposed $420, current $335. 4 instances. 135 workers exposed. Abatement due Feb 21, 2007, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 22, 2007. Proposed $375, current $300. 2 instances. 135 workers exposed. Abatement due Feb 21, 2007, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 22, 2007. Proposed $375, current $300. 135 workers exposed. Abatement due Feb 21, 2007, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 22, 2007. Proposed $3,375, current $300. 135 workers exposed. Abatement due Feb 21, 2007, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 22, 2007. Proposed $375, current $300. 150 workers exposed. Abatement due Feb 21, 2007, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 22, 2007. Proposed $375, current $300. 150 workers exposed. Abatement due Feb 21, 2007, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 22, 2007. Proposed $3,375, current $2,700. 7 instances. 135 workers exposed. Abatement due Jan 29, 2007, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 22, 2007. Proposed $3,375, current $300. 135 workers exposed. Abatement due Jan 29, 2007, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 22, 2007. Proposed $3,375, current $300. 135 workers exposed. Abatement due Jan 29, 2007, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 22, 2007. Proposed $3,375, current $2,700. 135 workers exposed. Abatement due Jan 29, 2007, completed. Read the rule.
Your rights
If you worked at this site, the inspection file is a public record once the case closes; request it from the Cal/OSHA district office with activity number 125941682. A worker who reported the hazard, the injury or the inspection and was then fired, demoted or cut has a retaliation claim under Labor Code 6310, one year to file with the Labor Commissioner and longer to sue. Injuries themselves go through workers' compensation. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, inspection 125941682, checked Nov 1, 2026. How to read a record. Back to the safety tracker.
About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.