What happened in this inspection
Cal/OSHA opened a complaint inspection of D & L Airflow Solutions at 1351 S Manhattan Ave, Fullerton (Orange County) on Oct 24, 2002. It was a complete inspection of the worksite focused on health hazards. 114 employees were recorded at the site, with union representation. Inspectors issued 32 citations (19 serious) and proposed $100,345 in penalties; the current total is $48,960. The case closed on Sep 13, 2010. The employer has 1 other inspection on its California record.
Citations
Each citation names the rule, its classification and the penalty as proposed and as it stands now.
Issued Apr 3, 2003. Proposed $210, current $150. 2 instances. 1 workers exposed. Abatement due May 3, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 3, 2003. Proposed $210, current $150. 3 instances. 2 workers exposed. Abatement due May 3, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 3, 2003. Proposed $210, current $150. 1 workers exposed. Abatement due May 3, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 3, 2003. Proposed $425, current $300. 114 workers exposed. Abatement due May 3, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 3, 2003. Proposed $425, current $0. 114 workers exposed. Abatement due Apr 3, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 3, 2003. Proposed $210, current $150. 1 workers exposed. Abatement due May 3, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 3, 2003. Proposed $210, current $150. 114 workers exposed. Abatement due May 3, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 3, 2003. Proposed $210, current $150. 2 instances. 2 workers exposed. Abatement due May 3, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 3, 2003. Proposed $425, current $300. 1 workers exposed. Abatement due May 3, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 3, 2003. Proposed $210, current $150. 5 workers exposed. Abatement due May 3, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 3, 2003. Proposed $425, current $300. 114 workers exposed. Abatement due May 3, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 3, 2003. Proposed $425, current $0. 114 workers exposed. Abatement due May 3, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 3, 2003. Proposed $4,500, current $2,700. 2 instances. 1 workers exposed. Abatement due Apr 10, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 3, 2003. Proposed $4,500, current $2,700. 6 instances. 4 workers exposed. Abatement due Apr 10, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 3, 2003. Proposed $4,500, current $300. 1 workers exposed. Abatement due Apr 10, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 3, 2003. Proposed $4,500, current $270. 2 instances. 2 workers exposed. Abatement due Apr 10, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 3, 2003. Proposed $4,500, current $2,700. 2 instances. 1 workers exposed. Abatement due Apr 10, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 3, 2003. Proposed $4,500, current $270. 2 instances. 1 workers exposed. Abatement due Apr 10, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 3, 2003. Proposed $4,500, current $2,700. 1 workers exposed. Abatement due Apr 10, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 3, 2003. Proposed $4,500, current $2,700. 9 instances. 6 workers exposed. Abatement due Apr 10, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 3, 2003. Proposed $4,500, current $2,700. 6 instances. 5 workers exposed. Abatement due Apr 10, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 3, 2003. Proposed $4,500, current $2,700. 4 instances. 4 workers exposed. Abatement due Apr 10, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 3, 2003. Proposed $4,500, current $2,700. 4 instances. 4 workers exposed. Abatement due Apr 10, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 3, 2003. Proposed $4,500, current $2,700. 1 workers exposed. Abatement due Apr 10, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 3, 2003. Proposed $4,500, current $2,700. 2 instances. 2 workers exposed. Abatement due Apr 10, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 3, 2003. Proposed $4,500, current $2,700. 1 workers exposed. Abatement due Apr 10, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 3, 2003. Proposed $9,000, current $5,400. 6 instances. 5 workers exposed. Abatement due Apr 10, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 3, 2003. Proposed $4,500, current $2,700. 1 workers exposed. Abatement due Apr 10, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 3, 2003. Proposed $4,500, current $2,700. 1 workers exposed. Abatement due Apr 10, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 3, 2003. Proposed $4,500, current $2,700. 3 instances. 2 workers exposed. Abatement due Apr 10, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 3, 2003. Proposed $4,500, current $270. 1 workers exposed. Abatement due Apr 10, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 3, 2003. Proposed $6,750, current $2,700. 1 workers exposed. Abatement due Apr 10, 2003, completed. Read the rule.
Your rights
If you worked at this site, the inspection file is a public record once the case closes; request it from the Cal/OSHA district office with activity number 125918565. A worker who reported the hazard, the injury or the inspection and was then fired, demoted or cut has a retaliation claim under Labor Code 6310, one year to file with the Labor Commissioner and longer to sue. Injuries themselves go through workers' compensation. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, inspection 125918565, checked Nov 1, 2026. How to read a record. Back to the safety tracker.
About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.