What happened in this inspection
Cal/OSHA opened a planned inspection of Revival Manufacture at 119 W. 36th Place, Los Angeles (Los Angeles County) on Oct 18, 2000. It was a complete inspection of the worksite focused on safety hazards. 32 employees were recorded at the site. Inspectors issued 17 citations (1 serious) and proposed $7,875 in penalties; the current total is $7,875. The case closed on Apr 23, 2001.
Citations
Each citation names the rule, its classification and the penalty as proposed and as it stands now.
Issued Apr 5, 2001. Proposed $175, current $175. 30 workers exposed. Abatement due Apr 18, 2001, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 5, 2001. Proposed $175, current $175. 2 instances. 30 workers exposed. Abatement due Apr 18, 2001, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 5, 2001. Proposed $175, current $175. 30 workers exposed. Abatement due Apr 18, 2001, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 5, 2001. Proposed $350, current $350. 4 instances. 32 workers exposed. Abatement due Apr 18, 2001, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 5, 2001. Proposed $350, current $350. 30 workers exposed. Abatement due Apr 18, 2001, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 5, 2001. Proposed $700, current $700. 9 instances. 30 workers exposed. Abatement due May 8, 2001, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 5, 2001. Proposed $175, current $175. 32 workers exposed. Abatement due May 8, 2001, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 5, 2001. Proposed $525, current $525. 2 instances. 32 workers exposed. Abatement due Apr 18, 2001, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 5, 2001. Proposed $350, current $350. 32 workers exposed. Abatement due Apr 18, 2001, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 5, 2001. Proposed $350, current $350. 2 instances. 32 workers exposed. Abatement due May 8, 2001, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 5, 2001. Proposed $525, current $525. 11 instances. 32 workers exposed. Abatement due May 8, 2001, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 5, 2001. Proposed $175, current $175. 10 workers exposed. Abatement due Apr 18, 2001, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 5, 2001. Proposed $175, current $175. 2 instances. 32 workers exposed. Abatement due May 8, 2001, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 5, 2001. Proposed $175, current $175. 2 instances. 32 workers exposed. Abatement due Apr 18, 2001, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 5, 2001. Proposed $175, current $175. 2 instances. 32 workers exposed. Abatement due Apr 18, 2001, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 5, 2001. Proposed $175, current $175. 2 instances. 32 workers exposed. Abatement due Apr 18, 2001, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 5, 2001. Proposed $3,150, current $3,150. 6 instances. 32 workers exposed. Abatement due Apr 18, 2001, completed. Read the rule.
Your rights
If you worked at this site, the inspection file is a public record once the case closes; request it from the Cal/OSHA district office with activity number 119944122. A worker who reported the hazard, the injury or the inspection and was then fired, demoted or cut has a retaliation claim under Labor Code 6310, one year to file with the Labor Commissioner and longer to sue. Injuries themselves go through workers' compensation. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, inspection 119944122, checked Nov 1, 2026. How to read a record. Back to the safety tracker.
About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.