Tom Beattie Inc dba Royal Roofing & Const. CO. safety record at a glance
Tom Beattie Inc dba Royal Roofing & Const. CO. has been the subject of 3 Cal/OSHA inspections in California since 2000, opened between Oct 25, 2010 and Oct 17, 2023. 1 of them were fatality or catastrophe inspections. All of them produced citations, 11 in all: 2 serious, 3 willful. Inspectors proposed $183,595 in penalties; after appeals and settlements the current total is $130,425. The largest single penalty, $113,780, came from an inspection opened Oct 25, 2010 in North Hollywood. 2 worker deaths were investigated. That places the employer at #262 of 122,853 California employers in the database by penalties.
Industry as coded by the inspecting office: Construction. Worksites in Fontana, Costa Mesa, North Hollywood.
Every inspection, newest first
Click a date for the citations in that inspection.
| Opened | City | Why | Result | Penalty | Closed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2023 | Fontana | Fatality or catastrophe | death 1 citation 1 serious | $15,750 | open |
| Jun 29, 2021 | Costa Mesa | Complaint | 3 citations | $895 | Sep 10, 2021 |
| Oct 25, 2010 | North Hollywood | Accident | death 7 citations 1 serious 3 willful | $113,780 $166,950 proposed | Jul 12, 2018 |
Also recorded as: Tom Beattie Inc.; Tom Beattie, Inc.
The rules this employer was cited under
- 8 CCR 1509, Injury and Illness Prevention Program (construction): 4 citations, $36,610
- 8 CCR 3395, Heat illness prevention, outdoor: 3 citations, $2,435
- 8 CCR 1730, Roof Hazards: 1 citation, $70,000
- 8 CCR 1632, Floor, roof and wall openings: 1 citation, 1 serious, $15,750
- 8 CCR 342, Reporting serious injuries and deaths: 1 citation, $5,000
- 8 CCR 3328, Machinery and equipment, general: 1 citation, 1 serious, $630
Accidents investigated
Local pages: Fontana employment lawyer, Costa Mesa employment lawyer.
How to read this record
Each row is one inspection by Cal/OSHA (or, rarely, federal OSHA) of one worksite. Why is the reason it was opened. Penalty is the current figure after any appeal or settlement; where it was reduced, the amount the inspector first proposed is shown under it. "Serious" means a realistic possibility of death or serious harm; "willful" and "repeat" carry penalties up to $162,851 each.
Citations document that the employer was told, in writing, what the rule required and when. That knowledge is often the center of a retaliation case: a worker who complained about the hazard an inspector later cited, and was then fired or cut, has a Labor Code 6310 claim, with lost wages and attorney's fees.
Full explainer: how to read a Cal/OSHA record.
If you work, or worked, at Tom Beattie Inc dba Royal Roofing & Const. CO.
Write down what you reported, to whom and when, and what changed afterward: shifts, pay, duties, write-ups. Request the inspection file from the Cal/OSHA district office using the activity number on the inspection page. An injury goes through workers' compensation; a firing, demotion or threat after a safety complaint or injury report is an employment claim with a one-year deadline at the Labor Commissioner (Labor Code 6310) and a longer one in court. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088 or send what you have.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, California inspections. Record last checked Nov 4, 2026. Back to the safety tracker.
About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.