T M Cobb CO safety record at a glance
T M Cobb CO has been the subject of 6 Cal/OSHA inspections in California since 2000, opened between Oct 8, 2003 and Aug 11, 2009. 5 of them were accident inspections. 3 of them produced citations, 8 in all: 3 serious. Inspectors proposed $42,915 in penalties; after appeals and settlements the current total is $8,970. The largest single penalty, $3,570, came from an inspection opened Aug 11, 2009 in San Bernardino. That places the employer at #16,300 of 122,854 California employers in the database by penalties.
Industry as coded by the inspecting office: Manufacturing. Worksites in San Bernardino, Riverside, Fresno.
Every inspection, newest first
Click a date for the citations in that inspection.
| Opened | City | Why | Result | Proposed | Penalty | Closed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2009 | San Bernardino | Planned | 5 citations 1 serious | $6,495 | $3,570 | Aug 13, 2010 |
| Jan 13, 2006 | Riverside | Accident | no citations | 0 | 0 | Feb 1, 2006 |
| Nov 7, 2005 | Riverside | Accident | 2 citations 1 serious | $18,420 | $2,700 | Oct 9, 2006 |
| Sep 7, 2004 | Riverside | Accident | no citations | 0 | 0 | Feb 14, 2005 |
| Jul 14, 2004 | Riverside | Accident | 1 citation 1 serious | $18,000 | $2,700 | Jul 12, 2008 |
| Oct 8, 2003 | Fresno | Accident | no citations | 0 | 0 | Jun 23, 2004 |
Also recorded as: T M Cobb; T M Cobb Company dba Haley Brothers Inc.
The rules this employer was cited under
- 8 CCR 4310: 1 citation, 1 serious, $2,925
- 8 CCR 4186: 1 citation, 1 serious, $2,700
- 8 CCR 4311: 1 citation, 1 serious, $2,700
- 8 CCR 4070: 1 citation, $325
- 8 CCR 5144, Respiratory protection: 1 citation, $160
- 8 CCR 4185: 1 citation, $160
- 8 CCR 3241, Live loads: 1 citation
- 8 CCR 3203, Injury and Illness Prevention Program: 1 citation
Accidents investigated
Local pages: San Bernardino employment lawyer, Riverside employment lawyer, Fresno employment lawyer.
How to read this record
Each row is one inspection by Cal/OSHA (or, rarely, federal OSHA) of one worksite. Why is the reason it was opened. Proposed is the penalty the inspector assessed; penalty is the current figure after any appeal or settlement. "Serious" means a realistic possibility of death or serious harm; "willful" and "repeat" carry penalties up to $162,851 each.
Citations document that the employer was told, in writing, what the rule required and when. That knowledge is often the center of a retaliation case: a worker who complained about the hazard an inspector later cited, and was then fired or cut, has a Labor Code 6310 claim, with lost wages and attorney's fees.
Full explainer: how to read a Cal/OSHA record.
If you work, or worked, at T M Cobb CO
Write down what you reported, to whom and when, and what changed afterward: shifts, pay, duties, write-ups. Request the inspection file from the Cal/OSHA district office using the activity number on the inspection page. An injury goes through workers' compensation; a firing, demotion or threat after a safety complaint or injury report is an employment claim with a one-year deadline at the Labor Commissioner (Labor Code 6310) and a longer one in court. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088 or send what you have.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, California inspections. Record last checked Nov 1, 2026. Back to the safety tracker.
About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.