Shambaugh & Son LP safety record at a glance
Shambaugh & Son LP has been the subject of 5 Cal/OSHA inspections in California since 2000, opened between Nov 10, 2016 and Sep 10, 2024. 3 of them were accident inspections. 3 of them produced citations, 10 in all: 3 serious. Inspectors proposed $65,245 in penalties; after appeals and settlements the current total is $47,995. The largest single penalty, $26,435, came from an inspection opened Jul 26, 2023 in Walnut. That places the employer at #1,609 of 122,854 California employers in the database by penalties.
Industry as coded by the inspecting office: Manufacturing; Public Administration; Construction. Worksites in Long Beach, Walnut, Jurupa Valley, Turlock.
Every inspection, newest first
Click a date for the citations in that inspection.
| Opened | City | Why | Result | Proposed | Penalty | Closed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2024 | Long Beach | Accident | 4 citations 1 serious | $20,060 | $20,060 | open |
| Jul 26, 2023 | Walnut | Accident | 4 citations 2 serious | $26,435 | $26,435 | open |
| Jul 7, 2017 | Jurupa Valley | Accident | 2 citations | $18,750 | $1,500 | Nov 2, 2021 |
| Mar 7, 2017 | Turlock | Planned | no citations | 0 | 0 | Mar 28, 2017 |
| Nov 10, 2016 | Turlock | Planned | no citations | 0 | 0 | Apr 4, 2017 |
Also recorded as: Shambaugh and Son, LP; Shambaugh and Son; Shambaugh & Son, L.P.
The rules this employer was cited under
- 8 CCR 3203, Injury and Illness Prevention Program: 3 citations, $2,435
- 8 CCR 3648: 2 citations, $1,500
- 8 CCR 3646: 1 citation, 1 serious, $18,000
- 8 CCR 4184, Cranes and derricks, general: 1 citation, 1 serious, $18,000
- 8 CCR 3650, Industrial trucks, operating rules: 1 citation, 1 serious, $6,750
- 8 CCR 3272: 1 citation, $750
- 8 CCR 3395, Heat illness prevention, outdoor: 1 citation, $560
Accidents investigated
Local pages: Long Beach employment lawyer, Jurupa Valley employment lawyer.
How to read this record
Each row is one inspection by Cal/OSHA (or, rarely, federal OSHA) of one worksite. Why is the reason it was opened. Proposed is the penalty the inspector assessed; penalty is the current figure after any appeal or settlement. "Serious" means a realistic possibility of death or serious harm; "willful" and "repeat" carry penalties up to $162,851 each.
Citations document that the employer was told, in writing, what the rule required and when. That knowledge is often the center of a retaliation case: a worker who complained about the hazard an inspector later cited, and was then fired or cut, has a Labor Code 6310 claim, with lost wages and attorney's fees.
Full explainer: how to read a Cal/OSHA record.
If you work, or worked, at Shambaugh & Son LP
Write down what you reported, to whom and when, and what changed afterward: shifts, pay, duties, write-ups. Request the inspection file from the Cal/OSHA district office using the activity number on the inspection page. An injury goes through workers' compensation; a firing, demotion or threat after a safety complaint or injury report is an employment claim with a one-year deadline at the Labor Commissioner (Labor Code 6310) and a longer one in court. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088 or send what you have.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, California inspections. Record last checked Nov 1, 2026. Back to the safety tracker.
About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.