Route 66 Roofing safety record at a glance
Route 66 Roofing has been the subject of 7 Cal/OSHA inspections in California since 2000, opened between Oct 4, 2003 and May 16, 2006. 5 of them were accident inspections. 3 of them produced citations, 7 in all: 0 serious. Inspectors proposed $5,905 in penalties; after appeals and settlements the current total is $1,295. The largest single penalty, $450, came from an inspection opened Jan 7, 2004 in Yorba Linda. That places the employer at #47,720 of 122,854 California employers in the database by penalties.
Industry as coded by the inspecting office: Construction; Administrative and Support and Waste Management Services. Worksites in Brea, Moreno Valley, Lancaster, Ladera Ranch, Yorba Linda, Murrieta.
Every inspection, newest first
Click a date for the citations in that inspection.
| Opened | City | Why | Result | Proposed | Penalty | Closed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2006 | Brea | Accident | no citations | 0 | 0 | May 16, 2006 |
| Mar 6, 2006 | Moreno Valley | Accident | no citations | 0 | 0 | May 30, 2006 |
| Feb 8, 2006 | Lancaster | Accident | no inspection made | 0 | 0 | Aug 7, 2006 |
| Nov 16, 2005 | Ladera Ranch | Planned | 1 citation | $420 | $420 | Sep 30, 2006 |
| Feb 10, 2004 | Lancaster | Accident | no citations | 0 | 0 | Feb 28, 2005 |
| Jan 7, 2004 | Yorba Linda | Accident | 1 citation | $5,060 | $450 | Jan 10, 2006 |
| Oct 4, 2003 | Murrieta | Programmed related | 5 citations | $425 | $425 | Oct 11, 2006 |
Also recorded as: Route 66 Roofing Inc.
The rules this employer was cited under
- 8 CCR 1512, Emergency medical services (construction): 4 citations, $675
- 8 CCR 3203, Injury and Illness Prevention Program: 1 citation, $450
- 8 CCR 1527: 1 citation, $85
- 8 CCR 1509, Injury and Illness Prevention Program (construction): 1 citation, $85
Accidents investigated
Local pages: Moreno Valley employment lawyer, Lancaster employment lawyer.
How to read this record
Each row is one inspection by Cal/OSHA (or, rarely, federal OSHA) of one worksite. Why is the reason it was opened. Proposed is the penalty the inspector assessed; penalty is the current figure after any appeal or settlement. "Serious" means a realistic possibility of death or serious harm; "willful" and "repeat" carry penalties up to $162,851 each.
Citations document that the employer was told, in writing, what the rule required and when. That knowledge is often the center of a retaliation case: a worker who complained about the hazard an inspector later cited, and was then fired or cut, has a Labor Code 6310 claim, with lost wages and attorney's fees.
Full explainer: how to read a Cal/OSHA record.
If you work, or worked, at Route 66 Roofing
Write down what you reported, to whom and when, and what changed afterward: shifts, pay, duties, write-ups. Request the inspection file from the Cal/OSHA district office using the activity number on the inspection page. An injury goes through workers' compensation; a firing, demotion or threat after a safety complaint or injury report is an employment claim with a one-year deadline at the Labor Commissioner (Labor Code 6310) and a longer one in court. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088 or send what you have.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, California inspections. Record last checked Nov 1, 2026. Back to the safety tracker.
About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.