Rainy Day Roofing, Inc. safety record at a glance
Rainy Day Roofing, Inc. has been the subject of 5 Cal/OSHA inspections in California since 2000, opened between Dec 8, 2016 and May 4, 2026. 3 of them were accident inspections. All of them produced citations, 10 in all: 3 serious. Inspectors proposed $36,929 in penalties; after appeals and settlements the current total is $33,050. The largest single penalty, $18,350, came from an inspection opened May 4, 2026 in Santa Ana. That places the employer at #3,019 of 122,854 California employers in the database by penalties.
Industry as coded by the inspecting office: Construction. Worksites in Santa Ana, Norwalk, Chico, Fort Hunter Liggett, Palmdale.
Every inspection, newest first
Click a date for the citations in that inspection.
| Opened | City | Why | Result | Proposed | Penalty | Closed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2026 | Santa Ana | Accident | 2 citations 1 serious | $18,350 | $18,350 | open |
| Aug 1, 2025 | Norwalk | Accident | 1 citation | $5,000 | $2,750 | open |
| May 12, 2021 | Chico | Referral | 1 citation | $410 | $410 | Jun 14, 2021 |
| Jun 21, 2017 | Fort Hunter Liggett | Planned | 2 citations 2 serious | $6,519 | $4,890 | Aug 30, 2017 |
| Dec 8, 2016 | Palmdale | Accident | 4 citations | $6,650 | $6,650 | Aug 18, 2017 |
Also recorded as: Rainy Day Roofing, LLC; Rainy Day Roofing.
The rules this employer was cited under
- 8 CCR 342, Reporting serious injuries and deaths: 2 citations, $7,750
- 8 CCR 1512, Emergency medical services (construction): 2 citations, $960
- 8 CCR 1509, Injury and Illness Prevention Program (construction): 2 citations, $900
- 8 CCR 3276, Portable ladders: 1 citation, 1 serious, $18,000
- 8 CCR 1926.453: 1 citation, 1 serious, $2,717
- 8 CCR 1926.300: 1 citation, 1 serious, $2,173
- 8 CCR 1510: 1 citation, $550
Local pages: Santa Ana employment lawyer, Norwalk employment lawyer, Chico employment lawyer.
How to read this record
Each row is one inspection by Cal/OSHA (or, rarely, federal OSHA) of one worksite. Why is the reason it was opened. Proposed is the penalty the inspector assessed; penalty is the current figure after any appeal or settlement. "Serious" means a realistic possibility of death or serious harm; "willful" and "repeat" carry penalties up to $162,851 each.
Citations document that the employer was told, in writing, what the rule required and when. That knowledge is often the center of a retaliation case: a worker who complained about the hazard an inspector later cited, and was then fired or cut, has a Labor Code 6310 claim, with lost wages and attorney's fees.
Full explainer: how to read a Cal/OSHA record.
If you work, or worked, at Rainy Day Roofing, Inc.
Write down what you reported, to whom and when, and what changed afterward: shifts, pay, duties, write-ups. Request the inspection file from the Cal/OSHA district office using the activity number on the inspection page. An injury goes through workers' compensation; a firing, demotion or threat after a safety complaint or injury report is an employment claim with a one-year deadline at the Labor Commissioner (Labor Code 6310) and a longer one in court. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088 or send what you have.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, California inspections. Record last checked Nov 1, 2026. Back to the safety tracker.
About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.