Quality Structures Inc safety record at a glance
Quality Structures Inc has been the subject of 27 Cal/OSHA inspections in California since 2000, opened between Feb 24, 2000 and Mar 7, 2012. 10 of them were planned inspections. 13 of them produced citations, 32 in all: 14 serious. Inspectors proposed $111,405 in penalties; after appeals and settlements the current total is $45,295. The largest single penalty, $7,125, came from an inspection opened Sep 23, 2004 in Moreno Valley. That places the employer at #1,784 of 122,854 California employers in the database by penalties.
Industry as coded by the inspecting office: Construction. Worksites in Carlsbad, Temecula, Victorville, San Jacinto, Beaumont, Hemet, Rancho Cucamonga, Highland.
Every inspection, newest first
Click a date for the citations in that inspection.
| Opened | City | Why | Result | Proposed | Penalty | Closed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2012 | Carlsbad | Planned | no citations | 0 | 0 | Mar 7, 2012 |
| Apr 29, 2011 | Carlsbad | Complaint | no citations | 0 | 0 | Jun 7, 2011 |
| Apr 20, 2011 | Carlsbad | Complaint | 4 citations 1 serious | $13,175 | $4,175 | Nov 5, 2012 |
| Aug 31, 2010 | Carlsbad | Complaint | no citations | 0 | 0 | Sep 15, 2010 |
| Mar 10, 2010 | Carlsbad | Complaint | 2 citations 1 serious | $2,610 | $975 | May 11, 2011 |
| May 16, 2007 | Temecula | Accident | no citations | 0 | 0 | Aug 21, 2008 |
| Apr 25, 2007 | Victorville | Accident | 2 citations 1 serious | $3,560 | $2,700 | Aug 21, 2008 |
| Jul 18, 2006 | Carlsbad | Accident | no citations | 0 | 0 | Jan 3, 2007 |
| May 3, 2006 | San Jacinto | Planned | 2 citations 2 serious | $15,300 | $3,465 | Mar 22, 2010 |
| May 2, 2006 | Beaumont | Planned | no citations | 0 | 0 | Jul 6, 2006 |
| Aug 10, 2005 | Carlsbad | Programmed related | no citations | 0 | 0 | Aug 11, 2005 |
| Jul 20, 2005 | Hemet | Complaint | 2 citations 1 serious | $3,560 | $2,885 | Mar 22, 2010 |
| Feb 24, 2005 | Rancho Cucamonga | Planned | no citations | 0 | 0 | Sep 22, 2005 |
| Sep 24, 2004 | Highland | Planned | no citations | 0 | 0 | Jan 10, 2005 |
| Sep 23, 2004 | Moreno Valley | Planned | 3 citations 2 serious | $7,125 | $7,125 | Mar 1, 2013 |
| Jun 30, 2004 | Victorville | Accident | no citations | 0 | 0 | Nov 17, 2004 |
| Apr 23, 2004 | Claremont | Planned | 2 citations | $950 | $350 | Dec 22, 2008 |
| Dec 9, 2003 | Moreno Valley | Unprogrammed related | no citations | 0 | 0 | Aug 27, 2004 |
| Oct 4, 2003 | Temecula | Planned | 3 citations 2 serious | $20,565 | $6,620 | Jan 10, 2006 |
| Nov 5, 2002 | Moreno Valley | Accident | 2 citations 1 serious | $16,525 | $2,500 | Feb 21, 2006 |
| Sep 2, 2002 | San Diego | Complaint | no citations | 0 | 0 | Sep 12, 2002 |
| Aug 28, 2002 | Rancho Bernardo | Unprogrammed related | 1 citation 1 serious | $5,060 | $4,050 | Apr 24, 2008 |
| Nov 29, 2001 | Cota de Casa | Accident | no citations | 0 | 0 | Jan 11, 2002 |
| Aug 22, 2000 | Brea | Planned | 2 citations | $10,120 | $3,100 | May 12, 2003 |
| Jul 20, 2000 | Carlsbad | Planned | no citations | 0 | 0 | Feb 23, 2001 |
| Mar 17, 2000 | Torrance | Accident | 1 citation | $300 | $300 | May 24, 2001 |
| Feb 24, 2000 | Fountain Valley | Unprogrammed related | 6 citations 2 serious | $12,555 | $7,050 | Oct 28, 2006 |
Also recorded as: Quality Structures Incorporated; Quality Structures; Quality Structures, Inc.; Quality Structures Inc.; Quality Structures, Inc.
The rules this employer was cited under
- 8 CCR 1716.2: 6 citations, 5 serious, $12,440
- 8 CCR 1670, Fall protection (construction): 4 citations, 3 serious, $12,035
- 8 CCR 1675: 3 citations, 2 serious, $4,120
- 8 CCR 342, Reporting serious injuries and deaths: 2 citations, $550
- 8 CCR 3203, Injury and Illness Prevention Program: 2 citations, $500
- 8 CCR 1509, Injury and Illness Prevention Program (construction): 2 citations, $300
- 8 CCR 1669: 1 citation, 1 serious, $4,050
- 8 CCR 4070: 1 citation, 1 serious, $3,375
Accidents investigated
Local pages: Carlsbad employment lawyer, Temecula employment lawyer, Victorville employment lawyer.
How to read this record
Each row is one inspection by Cal/OSHA (or, rarely, federal OSHA) of one worksite. Why is the reason it was opened. Proposed is the penalty the inspector assessed; penalty is the current figure after any appeal or settlement. "Serious" means a realistic possibility of death or serious harm; "willful" and "repeat" carry penalties up to $162,851 each.
Citations document that the employer was told, in writing, what the rule required and when. That knowledge is often the center of a retaliation case: a worker who complained about the hazard an inspector later cited, and was then fired or cut, has a Labor Code 6310 claim, with lost wages and attorney's fees.
Full explainer: how to read a Cal/OSHA record.
If you work, or worked, at Quality Structures Inc
Write down what you reported, to whom and when, and what changed afterward: shifts, pay, duties, write-ups. Request the inspection file from the Cal/OSHA district office using the activity number on the inspection page. An injury goes through workers' compensation; a firing, demotion or threat after a safety complaint or injury report is an employment claim with a one-year deadline at the Labor Commissioner (Labor Code 6310) and a longer one in court. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088 or send what you have.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, California inspections. Record last checked Nov 1, 2026. Back to the safety tracker.
About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.