Pride Industries safety record at a glance
Pride Industries has been the subject of 26 Cal/OSHA inspections in California since 2000, opened between Jun 4, 2001 and Jul 18, 2025. 14 of them were complaint inspections. 13 of them produced citations, 32 in all: 8 serious. Inspectors proposed $139,925 in penalties; after appeals and settlements the current total is $86,975. The largest single penalty, $39,370, came from an inspection opened Oct 16, 2001 in Sacramento. That places the employer at #582 of 122,854 California employers in the database by penalties. The same employer has 2 WARN layoff notices on file with the EDD. It also appears in 5 federal wage and hour cases.
Industry as coded by the inspecting office: Administrative and Support and Waste Management Services; Health Care and Social Assistance; Retail Trade. Worksites in Roseville, Sacramento, West Sacramento, Fair Oaks, McClellan, Travis Afb, Madera, Fairfield.
Every inspection, newest first
Click a date for the citations in that inspection.
| Opened | City | Why | Result | Proposed | Penalty | Closed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2025 | Roseville | Complaint | no citations | 0 | 0 | Sep 8, 2025 |
| Apr 1, 2025 | Sacramento | Complaint | 1 citation | $600 | $600 | Nov 5, 2025 |
| Dec 13, 2024 | Sacramento | Programmed related | no citations | 0 | 0 | Feb 28, 2025 |
| Sep 14, 2022 | Sacramento | Accident | no citations | 0 | 0 | Jan 24, 2023 |
| Aug 12, 2022 | West Sacramento | Accident | 1 citation | $1,125 | $1,125 | Apr 18, 2023 |
| Jul 6, 2021 | Fair Oaks | Complaint | no citations | 0 | 0 | Dec 24, 2021 |
| Jul 10, 2019 | McClellan | Complaint | no citations | 0 | 0 | Oct 29, 2019 |
| Oct 3, 2017 | Roseville | Complaint | no citations | 0 | 0 | Apr 3, 2018 |
| Feb 10, 2015 | Travis Afb | Follow-up | no inspection made | 0 | 0 | Feb 10, 2015 |
| Feb 26, 2014 | Madera | Unprogrammed related | no citations | 0 | 0 | May 2, 2014 |
| Jan 24, 2014 | Sacramento | Complaint | no citations | 0 | 0 | May 20, 2014 |
| Jul 17, 2013 | Travis Afb | Planned | 6 citations | $32,000 | $25,000 | Feb 10, 2015 |
| Feb 9, 2013 | Fairfield | Complaint | no citations | 0 | 0 | Apr 24, 2013 |
| Jun 27, 2011 | San Diego | Complaint | 5 citations 1 serious | $11,000 | $6,000 | Nov 16, 2011 |
| Aug 19, 2009 | Mather Field | Complaint | no citations | 0 | 0 | Dec 28, 2009 |
| Apr 13, 2009 | Fairfield | Accident | no citations | 0 | 0 | Jun 16, 2009 |
| Apr 7, 2009 | Fairfield | Accident | 2 citations 1 serious | $5,800 | $2,850 | Jun 1, 2010 |
| Feb 12, 2009 | Port Hueneme | Planned | 4 citations 1 serious | $4,200 | $3,300 | Jan 24, 2011 |
| Oct 17, 2007 | Sacramento | Complaint | 2 citations | $560 | $560 | Jun 27, 2008 |
| Apr 20, 2007 | Davis | Accident | 2 citations | $5,935 | $1,685 | Mar 16, 2009 |
| Feb 28, 2005 | Travis Afb | Planned | 1 citation | 0 | 0 | Apr 4, 2005 |
| Mar 6, 2003 | Fairfield/travis Airbase | Complaint | no citations | 0 | 0 | Apr 7, 2003 |
| Jan 9, 2002 | Fairfield/travis Airbase | Complaint | 3 citations | $1,085 | $1,085 | May 10, 2002 |
| Oct 16, 2001 | Sacramento | Accident | 3 citations 3 serious | $67,500 | $39,370 | Mar 20, 2007 |
| Jun 25, 2001 | Roseville | Complaint | 1 citation 1 serious | $5,060 | $2,700 | Mar 20, 2007 |
| Jun 4, 2001 | Auburn | Complaint | 1 citation 1 serious | $5,060 | $2,700 | Mar 20, 2007 |
Also recorded as: Pride Industries Inc.; Pride Industries, Inc.
The rules this employer was cited under
- 8 CCR 1910.134: 5 citations, $21,000
- 8 CCR 3203, Injury and Illness Prevention Program: 4 citations, $1,665
- 8 CCR 3314, Lockout and cleaning of machinery: 2 citations, 2 serious, $30,935
- 8 CCR 5162, Emergency eyewash and shower: 2 citations, 2 serious, $5,400
- 8 CCR 1910.1200: 2 citations, $4,000
- 8 CCR 1918.105: 2 citations, 1 serious, $3,500
- 8 CCR 1917.43: 2 citations, $1,500
- 8 CCR 5194, Hazard communication: 2 citations, $615
Accidents investigated
Local pages: Roseville employment lawyer, Sacramento employment lawyer.
How to read this record
Each row is one inspection by Cal/OSHA (or, rarely, federal OSHA) of one worksite. Why is the reason it was opened. Proposed is the penalty the inspector assessed; penalty is the current figure after any appeal or settlement. "Serious" means a realistic possibility of death or serious harm; "willful" and "repeat" carry penalties up to $162,851 each.
Citations document that the employer was told, in writing, what the rule required and when. That knowledge is often the center of a retaliation case: a worker who complained about the hazard an inspector later cited, and was then fired or cut, has a Labor Code 6310 claim, with lost wages and attorney's fees.
Full explainer: how to read a Cal/OSHA record.
If you work, or worked, at Pride Industries
Write down what you reported, to whom and when, and what changed afterward: shifts, pay, duties, write-ups. Request the inspection file from the Cal/OSHA district office using the activity number on the inspection page. An injury goes through workers' compensation; a firing, demotion or threat after a safety complaint or injury report is an employment claim with a one-year deadline at the Labor Commissioner (Labor Code 6310) and a longer one in court. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088 or send what you have.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, California inspections. Record last checked Nov 1, 2026. Back to the safety tracker.
About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.