Pacific Seafood Group. dba Craig & Hamilton Meat C safety record at a glance
Pacific Seafood Group. dba Craig & Hamilton Meat C has been the subject of 3 Cal/OSHA inspections in California since 2000, opened between Jan 27, 2006 and Feb 14, 2018. 2 of them were accident inspections. All of them produced citations, 13 in all: 4 serious. Inspectors proposed $36,335 in penalties; after appeals and settlements the current total is $33,035. The largest single penalty, $24,560, came from an inspection opened Feb 14, 2018 in Eureka. That places the employer at #3,022 of 122,854 California employers in the database by penalties.
Industry as coded by the inspecting office: Manufacturing; Retail Trade. Worksites in Eureka, Sacramento, Stockton.
Every inspection, newest first
Click a date for the citations in that inspection.
| Opened | City | Why | Result | Proposed | Penalty | Closed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2018 | Eureka | Accident | 4 citations 2 serious | $24,560 | $24,560 | May 1, 2018 |
| Aug 18, 2006 | Sacramento | Accident | 3 citations | $2,925 | $2,925 | Oct 19, 2006 |
| Jan 27, 2006 | Stockton | Planned | 6 citations 2 serious | $8,850 | $5,550 | Aug 20, 2007 |
Also recorded as: Pacific Seafood Group Dba: Pacific Fresh Seafood; Pacific Seafood Group.
The rules this employer was cited under
- 8 CCR 3999, Hand tools: 2 citations, 2 serious, $20,700
- 8 CCR 3203, Injury and Illness Prevention Program: 2 citations, $1,875
- 8 CCR 3314, Lockout and cleaning of machinery: 1 citation, 1 serious, $5,060
- 8 CCR 5185: 1 citation, 1 serious, $2,700
- 8 CCR 3668, Powered industrial trucks, training: 1 citation, $1,125
- 8 CCR 4000: 1 citation, $750
- 8 CCR 3650, Industrial trucks, operating rules: 1 citation, $675
- 8 CCR 2340.24: 1 citation, $150
Accidents investigated
Local pages: Sacramento employment lawyer, Stockton employment lawyer.
How to read this record
Each row is one inspection by Cal/OSHA (or, rarely, federal OSHA) of one worksite. Why is the reason it was opened. Proposed is the penalty the inspector assessed; penalty is the current figure after any appeal or settlement. "Serious" means a realistic possibility of death or serious harm; "willful" and "repeat" carry penalties up to $162,851 each.
Citations document that the employer was told, in writing, what the rule required and when. That knowledge is often the center of a retaliation case: a worker who complained about the hazard an inspector later cited, and was then fired or cut, has a Labor Code 6310 claim, with lost wages and attorney's fees.
Full explainer: how to read a Cal/OSHA record.
If you work, or worked, at Pacific Seafood Group. dba Craig & Hamilton Meat C
Write down what you reported, to whom and when, and what changed afterward: shifts, pay, duties, write-ups. Request the inspection file from the Cal/OSHA district office using the activity number on the inspection page. An injury goes through workers' compensation; a firing, demotion or threat after a safety complaint or injury report is an employment claim with a one-year deadline at the Labor Commissioner (Labor Code 6310) and a longer one in court. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088 or send what you have.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, California inspections. Record last checked Nov 1, 2026. Back to the safety tracker.
About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.