Old Spaghetti Factory safety record at a glance
Old Spaghetti Factory has been the subject of 5 Cal/OSHA inspections in California since 2000, opened between Oct 13, 2000 and Sep 1, 2006. 4 of them were complaint inspections. All of them produced citations, 16 in all: 0 serious. Inspectors proposed $8,305 in penalties; after appeals and settlements the current total is $3,020. The largest single penalty, $1,200, came from an inspection opened Oct 13, 2000 in Duarte. That places the employer at #33,418 of 122,854 California employers in the database by penalties. The same employer has 2 WARN layoff notices on file with the EDD.
Industry as coded by the inspecting office: Accommodation and Food Services. Worksites in Rancho Cordova, San Jose, Elk Grove, Duarte.
Every inspection, newest first
Click a date for the citations in that inspection.
| Opened | City | Why | Result | Proposed | Penalty | Closed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2006 | Rancho Cordova | Complaint | 3 citations | $900 | $900 | Apr 23, 2007 |
| Feb 13, 2002 | San Jose | Complaint | 2 citations | $320 | $320 | Jul 8, 2002 |
| Jan 30, 2002 | Elk Grove | Complaint | 1 citation | $150 | $150 | Sep 20, 2006 |
| Jan 9, 2001 | San Jose | Complaint | 4 citations | $750 | $450 | Jun 18, 2007 |
| Oct 13, 2000 | Duarte | Accident | 6 citations | $6,185 | $1,200 | Sep 14, 2006 |
Also recorded as: The Old Spaghetti Factory.
The rules this employer was cited under
- 8 CCR 3203, Injury and Illness Prevention Program: 4 citations, $925
- 8 CCR 2340.23: 2 citations, $900
- 8 CCR 3273, Working area, floors and walkways: 2 citations, $160
- 8 CCR 5194, Hazard communication: 1 citation, $425
- 8 CCR 3249: 1 citation, $160
- 8 CCR 3328, Machinery and equipment, general: 1 citation, $150
- 8 CCR 3272: 1 citation, $150
- 8 CCR 6151, Portable fire extinguishers: 1 citation, $150
Local pages: San Jose employment lawyer, Elk Grove employment lawyer.
How to read this record
Each row is one inspection by Cal/OSHA (or, rarely, federal OSHA) of one worksite. Why is the reason it was opened. Proposed is the penalty the inspector assessed; penalty is the current figure after any appeal or settlement. "Serious" means a realistic possibility of death or serious harm; "willful" and "repeat" carry penalties up to $162,851 each.
Citations document that the employer was told, in writing, what the rule required and when. That knowledge is often the center of a retaliation case: a worker who complained about the hazard an inspector later cited, and was then fired or cut, has a Labor Code 6310 claim, with lost wages and attorney's fees.
Full explainer: how to read a Cal/OSHA record.
If you work, or worked, at Old Spaghetti Factory
Write down what you reported, to whom and when, and what changed afterward: shifts, pay, duties, write-ups. Request the inspection file from the Cal/OSHA district office using the activity number on the inspection page. An injury goes through workers' compensation; a firing, demotion or threat after a safety complaint or injury report is an employment claim with a one-year deadline at the Labor Commissioner (Labor Code 6310) and a longer one in court. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088 or send what you have.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, California inspections. Record last checked Nov 1, 2026. Back to the safety tracker.
About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.