North State Electrical Contractors, Inc. safety record at a glance
North State Electrical Contractors, Inc. has been the subject of 6 Cal/OSHA inspections in California since 2000, opened between May 11, 2015 and Oct 7, 2025. 2 of them were unprogrammed related inspections. 1 of them produced citations, 7 in all: 3 serious. Inspectors proposed $19,485 in penalties; after appeals and settlements the current total is $11,455. The largest single penalty, $11,455, came from an inspection opened May 8, 2017 in Sacramento. That places the employer at #13,543 of 122,854 California employers in the database by penalties.
Industry as coded by the inspecting office: Construction. Worksites in Rancho Cordova, Chico, Sacramento, Groveland, Roseville.
Every inspection, newest first
Click a date for the citations in that inspection.
| Opened | City | Why | Result | Proposed | Penalty | Closed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2025 | Rancho Cordova | Accident | no citations | 0 | 0 | Dec 16, 2025 |
| Nov 15, 2021 | Chico | Programmed related | no citations | 0 | 0 | Mar 25, 2022 |
| Apr 17, 2019 | Sacramento | Unprogrammed related | no citations | 0 | 0 | Jun 6, 2019 |
| May 8, 2017 | Sacramento | Complaint | 7 citations 3 serious | $19,485 | $11,455 | Sep 27, 2017 |
| Jun 17, 2015 | Groveland | Referral | no citations | 0 | 0 | Aug 25, 2015 |
| May 11, 2015 | Roseville | Unprogrammed related | no citations | 0 | 0 | Jul 1, 2015 |
Also recorded as: North State Electrical Contractors, Inc.
The rules this employer was cited under
- 8 CCR 1637, Scaffold planking: 4 citations, 2 serious, $6,585
- 8 CCR 1670, Fall protection (construction): 1 citation, 1 serious, $4,500
- 8 CCR 1509, Injury and Illness Prevention Program (construction): 1 citation, $185
- 8 CCR 3395, Heat illness prevention, outdoor: 1 citation, $185
Local pages: Chico employment lawyer, Sacramento employment lawyer.
How to read this record
Each row is one inspection by Cal/OSHA (or, rarely, federal OSHA) of one worksite. Why is the reason it was opened. Proposed is the penalty the inspector assessed; penalty is the current figure after any appeal or settlement. "Serious" means a realistic possibility of death or serious harm; "willful" and "repeat" carry penalties up to $162,851 each.
Citations document that the employer was told, in writing, what the rule required and when. That knowledge is often the center of a retaliation case: a worker who complained about the hazard an inspector later cited, and was then fired or cut, has a Labor Code 6310 claim, with lost wages and attorney's fees.
Full explainer: how to read a Cal/OSHA record.
If you work, or worked, at North State Electrical Contractors, Inc.
Write down what you reported, to whom and when, and what changed afterward: shifts, pay, duties, write-ups. Request the inspection file from the Cal/OSHA district office using the activity number on the inspection page. An injury goes through workers' compensation; a firing, demotion or threat after a safety complaint or injury report is an employment claim with a one-year deadline at the Labor Commissioner (Labor Code 6310) and a longer one in court. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088 or send what you have.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, California inspections. Record last checked Nov 1, 2026. Back to the safety tracker.
About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.