North Cal Hauling CO safety record at a glance
North Cal Hauling CO has been the subject of 5 Cal/OSHA inspections in California since 2000, opened between Apr 18, 2014 and Jan 21, 2025. 1 of them were fatality or catastrophe inspections. 2 of them produced citations, 6 in all: 0 serious. Inspectors proposed $2,060 in penalties; after appeals and settlements the current total is $1,660. The largest single penalty, $1,175, came from an inspection opened Apr 19, 2016 in Sacramento. 1 worker death was investigated. That places the employer at #43,413 of 122,854 California employers in the database by penalties. It also appears in 2 federal wage and hour cases.
Industry as coded by the inspecting office: Administrative and Support and Waste Management Services; Construction. Worksites in Sacramento, Rancho Cordova, Clovis, Mante.
Every inspection, newest first
Click a date for the citations in that inspection.
| Opened | City | Why | Result | Proposed | Penalty | Closed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2025 | Sacramento | Fatality or catastrophe | death no citations | 0 | 0 | Jul 10, 2025 |
| Apr 24, 2018 | Rancho Cordova | Accident | 1 citation | $485 | $485 | Dec 13, 2018 |
| Aug 22, 2017 | Clovis | Complaint | no inspection made | 0 | 0 | Nov 3, 2017 |
| Apr 19, 2016 | Sacramento | Planned | 5 citations | $1,575 | $1,175 | Jan 3, 2017 |
| Apr 18, 2014 | Mante | Unprogrammed related | no citations | 0 | 0 | May 23, 2014 |
Also recorded as: North Cal Hauling; North Cal Hauling, CO.; North Cal Hauling CO.
The rules this employer was cited under
- 8 CCR 4300.32: 2 citations, $450
- 8 CCR 3276, Portable ladders: 1 citation, $485
- 8 CCR 3395, Heat illness prevention, outdoor: 1 citation, $335
- 8 CCR 3400, Medical services and first aid: 1 citation, $225
- 8 CCR 5144, Respiratory protection: 1 citation, $165
Accidents investigated
Local pages: Sacramento employment lawyer, Clovis employment lawyer.
How to read this record
Each row is one inspection by Cal/OSHA (or, rarely, federal OSHA) of one worksite. Why is the reason it was opened. Proposed is the penalty the inspector assessed; penalty is the current figure after any appeal or settlement. "Serious" means a realistic possibility of death or serious harm; "willful" and "repeat" carry penalties up to $162,851 each.
Citations document that the employer was told, in writing, what the rule required and when. That knowledge is often the center of a retaliation case: a worker who complained about the hazard an inspector later cited, and was then fired or cut, has a Labor Code 6310 claim, with lost wages and attorney's fees.
Full explainer: how to read a Cal/OSHA record.
If you work, or worked, at North Cal Hauling CO
Write down what you reported, to whom and when, and what changed afterward: shifts, pay, duties, write-ups. Request the inspection file from the Cal/OSHA district office using the activity number on the inspection page. An injury goes through workers' compensation; a firing, demotion or threat after a safety complaint or injury report is an employment claim with a one-year deadline at the Labor Commissioner (Labor Code 6310) and a longer one in court. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088 or send what you have.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, California inspections. Record last checked Nov 1, 2026. Back to the safety tracker.
About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.