Neff Construction Inc safety record at a glance
Neff Construction Inc has been the subject of 6 Cal/OSHA inspections in California since 2000, opened between Dec 6, 2000 and Mar 25, 2019. 4 of them were unprogrammed related inspections. 4 of them produced citations, 5 in all: 1 serious. Inspectors proposed $24,095 in penalties; after appeals and settlements the current total is $4,795. The largest single penalty, $2,110, came from an inspection opened Jun 15, 2015 in Irvine. That places the employer at #26,216 of 122,854 California employers in the database by penalties.
Industry as coded by the inspecting office: Construction; Educational Services. Worksites in Long Beach, Fontana, Irvine, Corona, Yucaipa, San Bernardino.
Every inspection, newest first
Click a date for the citations in that inspection.
| Opened | City | Why | Result | Proposed | Penalty | Closed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2019 | Long Beach | Unprogrammed related | no citations | 0 | 0 | Sep 25, 2019 |
| Oct 13, 2015 | Fontana | Complaint | 1 citation | $435 | $435 | Apr 15, 2016 |
| Jun 15, 2015 | Irvine | Accident | 2 citations | $18,035 | $2,110 | Aug 24, 2021 |
| Apr 14, 2010 | Corona | Unprogrammed related | 1 citation | $2,925 | $450 | Feb 15, 2012 |
| Oct 17, 2003 | Yucaipa | Unprogrammed related | no citations | 0 | 0 | Apr 2, 2004 |
| Dec 6, 2000 | San Bernardino | Unprogrammed related | 1 citation 1 serious | $2,700 | $1,800 | Mar 22, 2001 |
Also recorded as: Neff Construction Inc.; Neff Construction.
The rules this employer was cited under
- 8 CCR 1513: 1 citation, 1 serious, $1,800
- 8 CCR 1670, Fall protection (construction): 1 citation, $1,625
- 8 CCR 1509, Injury and Illness Prevention Program (construction): 1 citation, $485
- 8 CCR 1629: 1 citation, $450
- 8 CCR 1626, Scaffolds: 1 citation, $435
Local pages: Long Beach employment lawyer, Fontana employment lawyer, Irvine employment lawyer.
How to read this record
Each row is one inspection by Cal/OSHA (or, rarely, federal OSHA) of one worksite. Why is the reason it was opened. Proposed is the penalty the inspector assessed; penalty is the current figure after any appeal or settlement. "Serious" means a realistic possibility of death or serious harm; "willful" and "repeat" carry penalties up to $162,851 each.
Citations document that the employer was told, in writing, what the rule required and when. That knowledge is often the center of a retaliation case: a worker who complained about the hazard an inspector later cited, and was then fired or cut, has a Labor Code 6310 claim, with lost wages and attorney's fees.
Full explainer: how to read a Cal/OSHA record.
If you work, or worked, at Neff Construction Inc
Write down what you reported, to whom and when, and what changed afterward: shifts, pay, duties, write-ups. Request the inspection file from the Cal/OSHA district office using the activity number on the inspection page. An injury goes through workers' compensation; a firing, demotion or threat after a safety complaint or injury report is an employment claim with a one-year deadline at the Labor Commissioner (Labor Code 6310) and a longer one in court. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088 or send what you have.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, California inspections. Record last checked Nov 1, 2026. Back to the safety tracker.
About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.