Jeffco Painting & Coating Inc safety record at a glance
Jeffco Painting & Coating Inc has been the subject of 8 Cal/OSHA inspections in California since 2000, opened between Mar 7, 2001 and Nov 1, 2021. 5 of them were planned inspections. 4 of them produced citations, 8 in all: 0 serious. Inspectors proposed $6,425 in penalties; after appeals and settlements the current total is $1,200. The largest single penalty, $1,200, came from an inspection opened Nov 1, 2021 in Richmond. That places the employer at #48,763 of 122,854 California employers in the database by penalties.
Industry as coded by the inspecting office: Construction. Worksites in Richmond, Los Gatos, Oakdale, Eldorado Hills, Livermore, San Francisco.
Every inspection, newest first
Click a date for the citations in that inspection.
| Opened | City | Why | Result | Proposed | Penalty | Closed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2021 | Richmond | Complaint | 3 citations | $5,700 | $1,200 | Nov 21, 2022 |
| May 12, 2009 | Los Gatos | Planned | 2 citations | $560 | 0 | Sep 13, 2010 |
| Mar 9, 2006 | Oakdale | Planned | 1 citation | 0 | 0 | May 30, 2006 |
| Feb 6, 2006 | Oakdale | Planned | no inspection made | 0 | 0 | Feb 28, 2006 |
| Aug 28, 2002 | Eldorado Hills | Complaint | no citations | 0 | 0 | Oct 3, 2002 |
| Jan 9, 2002 | Livermore | Planned | 2 citations | $165 | 0 | Oct 3, 2002 |
| Dec 15, 2001 | Livermore | Planned | no inspection made | 0 | 0 | Dec 15, 2001 |
| Mar 7, 2001 | San Francisco | Programmed related | no citations | 0 | 0 | Nov 15, 2001 |
Also recorded as: Jeffco Painting & Coating, Inc.; Jeffco Painting & Coating Inc.
The rules this employer was cited under
- 8 CCR 1532.1, Lead (construction): 2 citations, $600
- 8 CCR 3301: 1 citation, $600
- 8 CCR 1675: 1 citation
- 8 CCR 3280: 1 citation
- 8 CCR 1513: 1 citation
- 8 CCR 8445: 1 citation
- 8 CCR 461: 1 citation
Local pages: Richmond employment lawyer.
How to read this record
Each row is one inspection by Cal/OSHA (or, rarely, federal OSHA) of one worksite. Why is the reason it was opened. Proposed is the penalty the inspector assessed; penalty is the current figure after any appeal or settlement. "Serious" means a realistic possibility of death or serious harm; "willful" and "repeat" carry penalties up to $162,851 each.
Citations document that the employer was told, in writing, what the rule required and when. That knowledge is often the center of a retaliation case: a worker who complained about the hazard an inspector later cited, and was then fired or cut, has a Labor Code 6310 claim, with lost wages and attorney's fees.
Full explainer: how to read a Cal/OSHA record.
If you work, or worked, at Jeffco Painting & Coating Inc
Write down what you reported, to whom and when, and what changed afterward: shifts, pay, duties, write-ups. Request the inspection file from the Cal/OSHA district office using the activity number on the inspection page. An injury goes through workers' compensation; a firing, demotion or threat after a safety complaint or injury report is an employment claim with a one-year deadline at the Labor Commissioner (Labor Code 6310) and a longer one in court. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088 or send what you have.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, California inspections. Record last checked Nov 1, 2026. Back to the safety tracker.
About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.