Hupp Neon safety record at a glance
Hupp Neon has been the subject of 8 Cal/OSHA inspections in California since 2000, opened between May 23, 2001 and Jun 14, 2011. 5 of them were planned inspections. 5 of them produced citations, 7 in all: 4 serious. Inspectors proposed $16,500 in penalties; after appeals and settlements the current total is $7,400. The largest single penalty, $4,500, came from an inspection opened Dec 29, 2005 in Yuba City. That places the employer at #18,472 of 122,854 California employers in the database by penalties.
Industry as coded by the inspecting office: Construction; Manufacturing. Worksites in Corning, Yuba City, Paradise, Willows, Ukiah, Chico.
Every inspection, newest first
Click a date for the citations in that inspection.
| Opened | City | Why | Result | Proposed | Penalty | Closed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2011 | Corning | Planned | 1 citation | $435 | $435 | Jun 30, 2011 |
| Dec 27, 2007 | Corning | Planned | no citations | 0 | 0 | Feb 13, 2008 |
| Feb 3, 2006 | Corning | Accident | no citations | 0 | 0 | Apr 12, 2006 |
| Dec 29, 2005 | Yuba City | Planned | 1 citation 1 serious | $10,000 | $4,500 | Apr 26, 2007 |
| Mar 9, 2004 | Paradise | Programmed related | no citations | 0 | 0 | Apr 6, 2004 |
| Feb 9, 2004 | Willows | Planned | 1 citation 1 serious | $4,950 | $1,350 | May 31, 2005 |
| Sep 24, 2003 | Ukiah | Planned | 3 citations 2 serious | $1,040 | $1,040 | Apr 24, 2006 |
| May 23, 2001 | Chico | Complaint | 1 citation | $75 | $75 | Nov 30, 2001 |
The rules this employer was cited under
- 8 CCR 1670, Fall protection (construction): 1 citation, 1 serious, $4,500
- 8 CCR 3648: 1 citation, 1 serious, $1,350
- 8 CCR 3381: 1 citation, 1 serious, $900
- 8 CCR 341: 1 citation, $435
- 8 CCR 5002: 1 citation, 1 serious, $90
- 8 CCR 5194, Hazard communication: 1 citation, $75
- 8 CCR 1509, Injury and Illness Prevention Program (construction): 1 citation, $50
Accidents investigated
How to read this record
Each row is one inspection by Cal/OSHA (or, rarely, federal OSHA) of one worksite. Why is the reason it was opened. Proposed is the penalty the inspector assessed; penalty is the current figure after any appeal or settlement. "Serious" means a realistic possibility of death or serious harm; "willful" and "repeat" carry penalties up to $162,851 each.
Citations document that the employer was told, in writing, what the rule required and when. That knowledge is often the center of a retaliation case: a worker who complained about the hazard an inspector later cited, and was then fired or cut, has a Labor Code 6310 claim, with lost wages and attorney's fees.
Full explainer: how to read a Cal/OSHA record.
If you work, or worked, at Hupp Neon
Write down what you reported, to whom and when, and what changed afterward: shifts, pay, duties, write-ups. Request the inspection file from the Cal/OSHA district office using the activity number on the inspection page. An injury goes through workers' compensation; a firing, demotion or threat after a safety complaint or injury report is an employment claim with a one-year deadline at the Labor Commissioner (Labor Code 6310) and a longer one in court. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088 or send what you have.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, California inspections. Record last checked Nov 1, 2026. Back to the safety tracker.
About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.