Concrete North, Inc. safety record at a glance
Concrete North, Inc. has been the subject of 7 Cal/OSHA inspections in California since 2000, opened between Jul 19, 2013 and Mar 23, 2023. 2 of them were programmed related inspections. 2 of them produced citations, 5 in all: 0 serious. Inspectors proposed $20,510 in penalties; after appeals and settlements the current total is $2,360. The largest single penalty, $2,100, came from an inspection opened Jun 7, 2017 in San Francisco. That places the employer at #37,484 of 122,854 California employers in the database by penalties.
Industry as coded by the inspecting office: Construction. Worksites in Chico, San Francisco, Red Bluff, South Lake Tahoe, Pleasant Hill.
Every inspection, newest first
Click a date for the citations in that inspection.
| Opened | City | Why | Result | Proposed | Penalty | Closed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2023 | Chico | Programmed related | no citations | 0 | 0 | May 5, 2023 |
| Jul 30, 2018 | Chico | Referral | 1 citation | $260 | $260 | Oct 12, 2018 |
| Jun 27, 2018 | Chico | Unprogrammed related | no citations | 0 | 0 | Oct 23, 2018 |
| Jun 7, 2017 | San Francisco | Accident | 4 citations | $20,250 | $2,100 | Nov 21, 2017 |
| Jul 31, 2015 | Red Bluff | Programmed related | no citations | 0 | 0 | Aug 7, 2015 |
| Nov 8, 2013 | South Lake Tahoe | Planned | no citations | 0 | 0 | Dec 13, 2013 |
| Jul 19, 2013 | Pleasant Hill | Unprogrammed related | no citations | 0 | 0 | Jul 30, 2013 |
Also recorded as: Concrete North Inc.; Concrete North Inc.
The rules this employer was cited under
- 8 CCR 1509, Injury and Illness Prevention Program (construction): 2 citations, $900
- 8 CCR 1698: 1 citation, $750
- 8 CCR 3328, Machinery and equipment, general: 1 citation, $450
- 8 CCR 3395, Heat illness prevention, outdoor: 1 citation, $260
Accidents investigated
Local pages: Chico employment lawyer, San Francisco employment lawyer.
How to read this record
Each row is one inspection by Cal/OSHA (or, rarely, federal OSHA) of one worksite. Why is the reason it was opened. Proposed is the penalty the inspector assessed; penalty is the current figure after any appeal or settlement. "Serious" means a realistic possibility of death or serious harm; "willful" and "repeat" carry penalties up to $162,851 each.
Citations document that the employer was told, in writing, what the rule required and when. That knowledge is often the center of a retaliation case: a worker who complained about the hazard an inspector later cited, and was then fired or cut, has a Labor Code 6310 claim, with lost wages and attorney's fees.
Full explainer: how to read a Cal/OSHA record.
If you work, or worked, at Concrete North, Inc.
Write down what you reported, to whom and when, and what changed afterward: shifts, pay, duties, write-ups. Request the inspection file from the Cal/OSHA district office using the activity number on the inspection page. An injury goes through workers' compensation; a firing, demotion or threat after a safety complaint or injury report is an employment claim with a one-year deadline at the Labor Commissioner (Labor Code 6310) and a longer one in court. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088 or send what you have.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, California inspections. Record last checked Nov 1, 2026. Back to the safety tracker.
About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.