Amb Ranch Management, Inc. safety record at a glance
Amb Ranch Management, Inc. has been the subject of 6 Cal/OSHA inspections in California since 2000, opened between Jun 17, 2015 and Mar 14, 2019. 4 of them were accident inspections. 4 of them produced citations, 12 in all: 1 serious, 1 repeat. Inspectors proposed $13,250 in penalties; after appeals and settlements the current total is $11,870. The largest single penalty, $7,750, came from an inspection opened Jun 13, 2017 in Raisin City. That places the employer at #13,084 of 122,854 California employers in the database by penalties.
Industry as coded by the inspecting office: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting. Worksites in Arcata, Bakersfield, Raisin City, Chowchilla.
Every inspection, newest first
Click a date for the citations in that inspection.
| Opened | City | Why | Result | Proposed | Penalty | Closed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2019 | Arcata | Accident | 2 citations | $1,500 | $1,220 | Apr 1, 2020 |
| Feb 5, 2019 | Arcata | Accident | no citations | 0 | 0 | Jul 26, 2019 |
| Nov 6, 2018 | Bakersfield | Accident | no citations | 0 | 0 | Mar 7, 2019 |
| Aug 9, 2018 | Arcata | Accident | 2 citations | $1,500 | $1,500 | Aug 28, 2019 |
| Jun 13, 2017 | Raisin City | Complaint | 4 citations 1 serious 1 repeat | $8,850 | $7,750 | open |
| Jun 17, 2015 | Chowchilla | Unprogrammed related | 4 citations | $1,400 | $1,400 | Oct 14, 2015 |
Also recorded as: Amb Ranch Management Inc; Amb Ranch Management; Amb Ranch Management Inc.
The rules this employer was cited under
- 8 CCR 3203, Injury and Illness Prevention Program: 4 citations, $1,770
- 8 CCR 3457, Field sanitation: 3 citations, $3,750
- 8 CCR 3395, Heat illness prevention, outdoor: 2 citations, 1 serious, $4,570
- 8 CCR 3440: 2 citations, $1,500
- 8 CCR 3439: 1 citation, $280
Accidents investigated
Local pages: Bakersfield employment lawyer.
How to read this record
Each row is one inspection by Cal/OSHA (or, rarely, federal OSHA) of one worksite. Why is the reason it was opened. Proposed is the penalty the inspector assessed; penalty is the current figure after any appeal or settlement. "Serious" means a realistic possibility of death or serious harm; "willful" and "repeat" carry penalties up to $162,851 each.
Citations document that the employer was told, in writing, what the rule required and when. That knowledge is often the center of a retaliation case: a worker who complained about the hazard an inspector later cited, and was then fired or cut, has a Labor Code 6310 claim, with lost wages and attorney's fees.
Full explainer: how to read a Cal/OSHA record.
If you work, or worked, at Amb Ranch Management, Inc.
Write down what you reported, to whom and when, and what changed afterward: shifts, pay, duties, write-ups. Request the inspection file from the Cal/OSHA district office using the activity number on the inspection page. An injury goes through workers' compensation; a firing, demotion or threat after a safety complaint or injury report is an employment claim with a one-year deadline at the Labor Commissioner (Labor Code 6310) and a longer one in court. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088 or send what you have.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, California inspections. Record last checked Nov 1, 2026. Back to the safety tracker.
About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.