Cal/OSHA inspections in Guadalupe at a glance
Employers in Guadalupe account for 102 Cal/OSHA and OSHA inspections since 2000, 51 of which produced citations (50%): 136 citations, 20 serious, $149,770 in penalties after appeals, and 0 worker deaths investigated. In the last 12 months 5 inspections opened. The industries inspected most here are Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting (34), (28), Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction (17).
All inspections, newest first
102 inspections, page 1 of 2. Click a date for the citations.
Largest penalties in Guadalupe
| Employer | Inspections | Citations | Penalties | Deaths | Latest |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BYRD Harvest, Inc. | 3 | 6 | $25,585 | 0 | Jun 17, 2025 |
| Midstate Harvesting Inc. | 1 | 1 | $14,400 | 0 | May 14, 2018 |
| Puritan Ice CO | 2 | 6 | $11,035 | 0 | Jun 26, 2003 |
| Ocean Front Farms, LLC | 1 | 2 | $10,885 | 0 | Jan 10, 2011 |
| Pacific Harvest Inc. | 3 | 4 | $10,540 | 0 | Dec 11, 2018 |
| Rancho Harvest, Inc. | 2 | 6 | $10,175 | 0 | Oct 14, 2010 |
| Gordon Sand CO. | 18 | 15 | $7,820 | 0 | Sep 23, 2026 |
| Apio, Inc. | 8 | 8 | $7,025 | 0 | Oct 11, 2018 |
| C. B. Labor | 1 | 7 | $6,525 | 0 | Mar 27, 2002 |
| Smith Packing, Inc. | 2 | 4 | $6,495 | 0 | Sep 11, 2012 |
| John Cravens Plastering Inc | 1 | 3 | $5,550 | 0 | Aug 18, 2005 |
| Earth Kist Farms | 1 | 3 | $5,430 | 0 | Apr 3, 2014 |
| Curation Foods, Inc | 2 | 2 | $4,635 | 0 | Apr 27, 2021 |
| MJD LLC | 1 | 3 | $3,500 | 0 | Jan 5, 2000 |
| Vernon & Associates Inc | 1 | 4 | $3,320 | 0 | Aug 18, 2005 |
| Coastal Pallet | 1 | 8 | $3,315 | 0 | Feb 4, 2004 |
| Lindsey Ice CO Inc dba Puritan Ice Company | 2 | 15 | $1,905 | 0 | Sep 3, 2008 |
| Hacienda Harvesting Inc. | 3 | 5 | $1,775 | 0 | Jul 22, 2010 |
| E & A Farming | 1 | 3 | $1,590 | 0 | Mar 12, 2026 |
| Red Diamond Cooling, Inc | 1 | 5 | $1,505 | 0 | Nov 22, 2024 |
Rules cited most in Guadalupe
- 8 CCR 3203, Injury and Illness Prevention Program: 13 citations
- 8 CCR 5189: 11 citations
- 8 CCR 5144, Respiratory protection: 8 citations
- 8 CCR 3395, Heat illness prevention, outdoor: 8 citations
- 8 CCR 3314, Lockout and cleaning of machinery: 6 citations
- 8 CCR 3457, Field sanitation: 6 citations, 1 serious
- 8 CCR 3441, Agricultural equipment operation: 5 citations, 4 serious
- 8 CCR 342, Reporting serious injuries and deaths: 5 citations
- 8 CCR 3440: 5 citations, 3 serious
- 8 CCR 3650, Industrial trucks, operating rules: 4 citations, 1 serious
By year opened
| Year | Inspections | With citations | Citations | Penalties | Deaths |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 5 | 1 | 3 | $1,590 | 0 |
| 2025 | 1 | 1 | 3 | $2,400 | 0 |
| 2024 | 2 | 1 | 5 | $1,505 | 0 |
| 2023 | 3 | 1 | 2 | $1,300 | 0 |
| 2022 | 1 | 1 | 2 | $23,000 | 0 |
| 2021 | 4 | 2 | 3 | $975 | 0 |
| 2020 | 4 | 2 | 3 | $4,600 | 0 |
| 2018 | 3 | 3 | 3 | $14,400 | 0 |
| 2017 | 5 | 0 | 0 | $0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 3 | 2 | 6 | $1,975 | 0 |
| 2015 | 3 | 1 | 2 | $10,120 | 0 |
| 2014 | 4 | 3 | 6 | $11,225 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1 | 1 | 1 | $750 | 0 |
| 2012 | 5 | 2 | 4 | $6,495 | 0 |
| 2011 | 4 | 2 | 3 | $10,985 | 0 |
| 2010 | 3 | 2 | 7 | $11,670 | 0 |
| 2009 | 2 | 1 | 2 | $550 | 0 |
| 2008 | 2 | 0 | 0 | $0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 6 | 3 | 5 | $875 | 0 |
| 2006 | 2 | 1 | 5 | $500 | 0 |
| 2005 | 4 | 4 | 16 | $15,405 | 0 |
| 2004 | 3 | 2 | 23 | $5,220 | 0 |
| 2003 | 2 | 2 | 6 | $11,035 | 0 |
| 2002 | 10 | 3 | 12 | $7,415 | 0 |
| 2001 | 12 | 6 | 7 | $1,105 | 0 |
| 2000 | 8 | 4 | 7 | $4,675 | 0 |
Your rights when the hazard is real in Guadalupe
You can report it, and the employer may not touch you for it. Any worker can file a confidential complaint with the nearest Cal/OSHA district office, by phone, online or in writing, and can ask that the employer not be told who complained. Firing, demoting, cutting hours, threatening or otherwise punishing a worker for a safety complaint, for reporting an injury, for testifying or for asking for a Cal/OSHA inspection is unlawful retaliation under Labor Code 6310; a complaint to the Labor Commissioner's Retaliation Complaint Investigation unit must be filed within one year, and a civil lawsuit is also available.
You can refuse work that would violate a safety standard and create a real and apparent hazard to you or your coworkers, and the employer may not retaliate for that refusal (Labor Code 6311). Say why in writing if you can, name the rule or the hazard, and keep a copy.
Every employer must have a written Injury and Illness Prevention Program (Title 8, section 3203), train workers on the hazards of their jobs, provide protective equipment at no cost, and give workers access to the exposure and medical records that concern them. Outdoor workplaces need a heat illness plan with water, shade and rest (section 3395); indoor ones above 82 degrees need the indoor rule (section 3396); and since July 2024 nearly every employer needs a workplace violence prevention plan (Labor Code 6401.9).
An injury itself is a workers' compensation claim, handled separately from anything on this page. What this firm handles is the employment side: the retaliation, the firing after the injury report, the wage and hour problems that usually travel with an unsafe workplace. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, California inspections opened through Oct 27, 2026. County is assigned from the worksite ZIP code. Back to the safety tracker.
About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.