What happened in this inspection
Cal/OSHA opened a complaint inspection of Commercial Wood Products CO at 10019 Yucca Road, Adelanto (San Bernardino County) on Nov 19, 2001. It was a complete inspection of the worksite focused on safety hazards. The record lists 115 employees, a figure the employer reports to the inspector and one that can cover more than the site inspected, with union representation. Inspectors issued 18 citations (7 serious, 2 repeat) and proposed $40,825 in penalties; after appeal or settlement the current total is $21,170. 18 citations were contested before the Appeals Board. 4 citations were deleted on appeal and are not counted. The case closed on Mar 18, 2013. The employer has 6 other inspections on its California record.
Citations
Each citation names the rule, its classification and the penalty as proposed and as it stands now.
Issued May 10, 2002. Proposed $425, current $355. 115 workers exposed. Contested Oct 24, 2002, final order Apr 16, 2003. Abatement due Jun 10, 2002, completed. Read the rule.
Issued May 10, 2002. Proposed $425, current $355. 2 instances. 4 workers exposed. Contested Oct 24, 2002, final order Apr 16, 2003. Abatement due Jun 9, 2002, completed. Read the rule.
Issued May 10, 2002. Proposed $425, current $355. 5 workers exposed. Contested Oct 24, 2002, final order Apr 16, 2003. Abatement due Jun 9, 2002, completed. Read the rule.
Issued May 10, 2002. Proposed $210, current $175. 3 instances. 115 workers exposed. Contested Oct 24, 2002, final order Apr 16, 2003. Abatement due Jun 9, 2002, completed. Read the rule.
Issued May 10, 2002. Proposed $210, current $175. 3 instances. 115 workers exposed. Contested Oct 24, 2002, final order Apr 16, 2003. Abatement due Jun 9, 2002, completed. Read the rule.
Issued May 10, 2002. Proposed $210, current $175. 2 instances. 115 workers exposed. Contested Oct 24, 2002, final order Apr 16, 2003. Abatement due Jun 9, 2002, completed. Read the rule.
Issued May 10, 2002. Proposed $210, current $175. 4 instances. 5 workers exposed. Contested Oct 24, 2002, final order Apr 16, 2003. Abatement due Jun 9, 2002, completed. Read the rule.
Issued May 10, 2002. Proposed $210, current $175. 1 worker exposed. Contested Oct 24, 2002, final order Apr 16, 2003. Abatement due Jun 9, 2002, completed. Read the rule.
Issued May 10, 2002. Proposed $4,500, current $3,150. 4 instances. 10 workers exposed. Contested Oct 24, 2002, final order Apr 16, 2003. Abatement due May 17, 2002, completed. Read the rule.
Issued May 10, 2002. Proposed $4,500, current $3,150. 2 instances. 3 workers exposed. Contested Oct 24, 2002, final order Apr 16, 2003. Abatement due May 17, 2002, completed. Read the rule.
Issued May 10, 2002. Proposed $4,500, current $315. 1 worker exposed. Contested Oct 24, 2002, final order Apr 16, 2003. Abatement due May 17, 2002, completed. Read the rule.
Issued May 10, 2002. Proposed $4,500, current $3,150. 1 worker exposed. Contested Oct 24, 2002, final order Apr 16, 2003. Abatement due May 17, 2002, completed. Read the rule.
Issued May 10, 2002. Proposed $4,500, current $350. 4 workers exposed. Contested Oct 24, 2002, final order Apr 16, 2003. Abatement due May 17, 2002, completed. Read the rule.
Issued May 10, 2002. Proposed $4,500, current $3,150. 2 instances. 4 workers exposed. Contested Oct 24, 2002, final order Apr 16, 2003. Abatement due May 17, 2002, completed. Read the rule.
Issued May 10, 2002. Proposed $4,500, current $3,150. 3 workers exposed. Contested Oct 24, 2002, final order Apr 16, 2003. Abatement due May 17, 2002, completed. Read the rule.
Issued May 10, 2002. Proposed $4,500, current $315. 1 worker exposed. Contested Oct 24, 2002, final order Apr 16, 2003. Abatement due May 17, 2002, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jun 5, 2002. Proposed $1,000, current $1,000. 3 instances. 150 workers exposed. Contested Oct 24, 2002, final order Apr 16, 2003. Abatement due Jun 12, 2002, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jun 5, 2002. Proposed $1,500, current $1,500. 2 instances. 150 workers exposed. Contested Oct 24, 2002, final order Apr 16, 2003. Abatement due Jun 9, 2002, completed. Read the rule.
Issued May 10, 2002. Proposed $370, current $1,000. 3 instances. 150 workers exposed. Contested Oct 24, 2002, final order Apr 16, 2003. Abatement due Jun 9, 2002, completed. Read the rule.
Issued May 10, 2002. Proposed $315, current $0. 2 instances. 115 workers exposed. Contested Oct 24, 2002, final order Apr 16, 2003. Abatement due Jun 9, 2002, completed. Read the rule.
Issued May 10, 2002. Proposed $370, current $1,500. 2 instances. 150 workers exposed. Contested Oct 24, 2002, final order Apr 16, 2003. Abatement due Jun 9, 2002, completed. Read the rule.
Issued May 10, 2002. Proposed $4,500, current $0. 2 instances. 1 worker exposed. Contested Oct 24, 2002, final order Apr 16, 2003. Abatement due May 17, 2002, completed. Read the rule.
Your rights
If you worked at this site, the inspection file is a public record once the case closes; request it from the Cal/OSHA district office with activity number 125932913. A worker who reported the hazard, the injury or the inspection and was then fired, demoted or cut has a retaliation claim under Labor Code 6310, one year to file with the Labor Commissioner and longer to sue. Injuries themselves go through workers' compensation. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, inspection 125932913, checked Nov 4, 2026. How to read a record. Back to the safety tracker.
About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.