Employer record, Cal/OSHA and OSHA inspections

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Cal/OSHA Inspections and Citations

Benjamin Eghbali, Esq.Legal notes by Benjamin Eghbali, Esq.,

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.: 50 inspections, 34 citations and $50,215 in penalties, latest opened Jan 22, 2026.

Every Cal/OSHA and federal OSHA inspection of a California workplace opened since 2000: 238,466 inspections of 122,853 employers, 447,188 citations, $586,238,760 in penalties, 5,717 deaths investigated.

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. safety record at a glance

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. has been the subject of 50 Cal/OSHA inspections in California since 2000, opened between May 13, 2003 and Jan 22, 2026. 25 of them were complaint inspections. 21 of them produced citations, 34 in all: 3 serious. Inspectors proposed $84,390 in penalties; after appeals and settlements the current total is $50,215. The largest single penalty, $18,375, came from an inspection opened Jan 6, 2015 in Temecula. That places the employer at #1,475 of 122,853 California employers in the database by penalties.

Industry as coded by the inspecting office: Other Services (except Public Administration); Retail Trade; Transportation and Warehousing. Worksites in Santa Ana, San Jose, Antelope, Visalia, Anderson, Stockton, Anaheim, Rohnert Park.

Every inspection, newest first

Click a date for the citations in that inspection.

OpenedCityWhyResultPenaltyClosed
Jan 22, 2026Santa AnaAccidentno citations$0Apr 8, 2026
May 15, 2024San JoseAccidentno citations$0Sep 19, 2024
May 16, 2023AntelopeComplaintno citations$0Sep 22, 2023
Apr 18, 2023VisaliaReferralno citations$0May 25, 2023
Dec 28, 2017AndersonFollow-upno citations$0Mar 28, 2018
Aug 21, 2017AndersonComplaint2 citations$1,120Sep 26, 2018
Feb 7, 2017StocktonAccidentno citations$0Jul 6, 2017
Dec 16, 2016AnaheimComplaint2 citations 1 serious$6,935Sep 29, 2017
Sep 20, 2016Rohnert ParkAccidentno citations$0Nov 22, 2016
Jun 7, 2016RiversideAccident2 citations 1 serious$9,560
$18,560 proposed
Feb 4, 2019
Jan 7, 2016CeresComplaintno citations$0Jan 8, 2016
Nov 23, 2015PalmdaleComplaintno citations$0May 12, 2016
Apr 28, 2015BakersfieldComplaint1 citation$210Oct 21, 2015
Apr 9, 2015BakersfieldAccidentno citations$0Sep 11, 2015
Jan 6, 2015TemeculaAccident2 citations 1 serious$18,375Aug 1, 2016
Dec 19, 2014Loma LindaComplaintno citations$0Jun 12, 2015
Sep 30, 2014Mountain ViewAccidentno citations$0Mar 9, 2015
Apr 15, 2014HanfordComplaintno citations$0Aug 19, 2014
Apr 3, 2014San LeandroAccident1 citation$0May 12, 2014
Jan 28, 2014KermanAccidentno citations$0May 21, 2014
Jan 17, 2014ClovisAccident1 citation$3,750
$5,000 proposed
Sep 16, 2014
Feb 22, 2013ClovisComplaint1 citation$185May 20, 2013
Jan 25, 2013San LeandroComplaintno citations$0Jul 17, 2013
Nov 8, 2012RosemeadAccidentno citations$0Feb 22, 2013
Nov 6, 2012MarysvilleAccidentno citations$0Dec 13, 2012
Oct 5, 2012WoodlandAccident1 citation$750May 14, 2013
Aug 29, 2012Mira LomaUnprogrammed relatedno inspection made$0Aug 29, 2012
May 10, 2012WoodlandComplaintno citations$0Jul 10, 2012
May 9, 2012YrekaComplaint1 citation$700Dec 5, 2012
Jan 19, 2012San MarcosFollow-up1 citation$210Jun 3, 2016
Jan 11, 2012PortervilleAccident1 citation$850Mar 6, 2013
Sep 13, 2011WoodlandComplaintno citations$0Jan 18, 2012
Aug 2, 2011SalinasComplaintno citations$0Aug 8, 2011
Apr 26, 2011SacramentoComplaintno citations$0May 24, 2011
Apr 21, 2011ClovisComplaintno citations$0Apr 25, 2011
Aug 16, 2010WoodlandComplaint1 citation$420Nov 23, 2010
Aug 19, 2009PortervilleComplaint2 citations$750Apr 7, 2010
Jun 5, 2009PortervilleAccidentno citations$0Jul 2, 2009
Jan 26, 2009Paso RoblesAccident1 citation$750
$5,060 proposed
Jul 9, 2010
Jan 16, 2009SacramentoComplaintno citations$0Jun 9, 2009
Jul 17, 2007San MarcosComplaint5 citations$1,500
$4,115 proposed
Apr 25, 2017
May 21, 2007OaklandAccidentno citations$0May 22, 2007
Jan 12, 2007ClovisComplaintno citations$0Jan 16, 2007
Jun 30, 2006RosevilleComplaint1 citation$280Apr 30, 2007
Feb 9, 2006RosevilleAccident4 citations$1,560Jun 27, 2008
Jan 3, 2006PowayComplaintno citations$0Jan 17, 2007
Jan 14, 2005SacramentoComplaintno citations$0Apr 27, 2005
Jul 9, 2004WoodlandComplaint1 citation$560Feb 5, 2007
Oct 3, 2003PleasantonAccident2 citations$750Jun 28, 2006
May 13, 2003PortervilleAccident1 citation$1,000
$18,000 proposed
Mar 30, 2006

Also recorded as: Wal-Mart Stores Inc; Wal-Mart Stores Inc dba Wal-Mart Store; Wal-Mart Stores Inc; Wal Mart Stores, Inc.; Wal-Mart Stores, Inc; Wal-Mart Stores Inc dba Wal-Mart Supercenter; Wal Mart Stores, Inc; Wal-Mart Stores Inc - DC; Wal-Mart Stores Inc; Wal-Mart Stores Inc; Wal-Mart Stores, Inc; Wal-Mart Stores Inc.

The rules this employer was cited under

Accidents investigated

Jan 31, 2017, Stockton. Employee suffers concussion when he slips and falls while st 1 hospitalized Inspection
Dec 28, 2013, Kerman. Employee Falls to Floor Level and Is Injured 1 hospitalized Inspection
Dec 9, 2013, Clovis. Employee Trips over Buffer, Fractures Leg 1 hospitalized Inspection
Oct 19, 2011, Porterville. Employee Trips and Falls, Sustains Hip Fracture 1 hospitalized Inspection
May 3, 2009, Porterville. Employee Is Injured When Caught Between Shelf and Handle 1 hospitalized Inspection
Jan 14, 2009, Paso Robles. Employee Is Injured in Fall from Ladder 1 hospitalized Inspection
Jan 20, 2006, Roseville. Employee Suffers Electric Shock While Activating Call Button Inspection
Sep 24, 2003, Pleasanton. Employee falls from ladder and injures herself 1 hospitalized Inspection
Apr 25, 2003, Porterville. Employee injured when toes amputated in fork lift accident 1 hospitalized Inspection
not stated, San Leandro. Accident investigation Inspection

Local pages: Santa Ana employment lawyer, San Jose employment lawyer.

How to read this record

Each row is one inspection by Cal/OSHA (or, rarely, federal OSHA) of one worksite. Why is the reason it was opened. Penalty is the current figure after any appeal or settlement; where it was reduced, the amount the inspector first proposed is shown under it. "Serious" means a realistic possibility of death or serious harm; "willful" and "repeat" carry penalties up to $162,851 each.

Citations document that the employer was told, in writing, what the rule required and when. That knowledge is often the center of a retaliation case: a worker who complained about the hazard an inspector later cited, and was then fired or cut, has a Labor Code 6310 claim, with lost wages and attorney's fees.

Full explainer: how to read a Cal/OSHA record.

If you work, or worked, at Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Write down what you reported, to whom and when, and what changed afterward: shifts, pay, duties, write-ups. Request the inspection file from the Cal/OSHA district office using the activity number on the inspection page. An injury goes through workers' compensation; a firing, demotion or threat after a safety complaint or injury report is an employment claim with a one-year deadline at the Labor Commissioner (Labor Code 6310) and a longer one in court. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088 or send what you have.

Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, California inspections. Record last checked Nov 4, 2026. Back to the safety tracker.

About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.

Talk to a California employment lawyer today.

Free, confidential consultation. We represent employees only, never employers.