What happened in this inspection
Cal/OSHA opened a complaint inspection of Sharp Industries Inc at 16536 S Figueroa St, Gardena (Los Angeles County) on Apr 28, 2016. It was a partial inspection focused on safety hazards. The record lists 12 employees, a figure the employer reports to the inspector and one that can cover more than the site inspected. Inspectors issued 15 citations (4 serious) and proposed $24,525 in penalties; after appeal or settlement the current total is $11,250. 15 citations were contested before the Appeals Board. The case closed on Sep 25, 2017. The employer has 2 other inspections on its California record.
Citations
Each citation names the rule, its classification and the penalty as proposed and as it stands now.
Issued Oct 10, 2016. Proposed $225, current $150. 12 workers exposed. Contested Oct 10, 2016, final order Sep 11, 2017. Read the rule.
Issued Oct 10, 2016. Proposed $450, current $150. 12 workers exposed. Contested Oct 10, 2016, final order Sep 11, 2017. Read the rule.
Issued Oct 10, 2016. Proposed $450, current $150. 12 workers exposed. Contested Oct 10, 2016, final order Sep 11, 2017. Abatement due Oct 28, 2016, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Oct 10, 2016. Proposed $450, current $150. 12 workers exposed. Contested Oct 10, 2016, final order Sep 11, 2017. Read the rule.
Issued Oct 10, 2016. Proposed $450, current $150. 12 workers exposed. Contested Oct 10, 2016, final order Sep 11, 2017. Read the rule.
Issued Oct 10, 2016. Proposed $450, current $150. 12 workers exposed. Contested Oct 10, 2016, final order Sep 11, 2017. Read the rule.
Issued Oct 10, 2016. Proposed $450, current $150. 12 workers exposed. Contested Oct 10, 2016, final order Sep 11, 2017. Read the rule.
Issued Oct 10, 2016. Proposed $450, current $150. 12 workers exposed. Contested Oct 10, 2016, final order Sep 11, 2017. Read the rule.
Issued Oct 10, 2016. Proposed $450, current $150. 12 workers exposed. Contested Oct 10, 2016, final order Sep 11, 2017. Read the rule.
Issued Oct 10, 2016. Proposed $450, current $0. 12 workers exposed. Contested Oct 10, 2016, final order Sep 11, 2017. Read the rule.
Issued Oct 10, 2016. Proposed $4,050, current $2,700. 12 workers exposed. Contested Oct 10, 2016, final order Sep 11, 2017. Read the rule.
Issued Oct 10, 2016. Proposed $4,050, current $1,350. 12 workers exposed. Contested Oct 10, 2016, final order Sep 11, 2017. Read the rule.
Issued Oct 10, 2016. Proposed $4,050, current $2,700. 12 workers exposed. Contested Oct 10, 2016, final order Sep 11, 2017. Read the rule.
Issued Oct 10, 2016. Proposed $4,050, current $2,700. 12 workers exposed. Contested Oct 10, 2016, final order Sep 11, 2017. Read the rule.
Issued Oct 10, 2016. Proposed $4,050, current $450. 12 workers exposed. Contested Oct 10, 2016, final order Sep 11, 2017. Read the rule.
Your rights
If you worked at this site, the inspection file is a public record once the case closes; request it from the Cal/OSHA district office with activity number 341438059. A worker who reported the hazard, the injury or the inspection and was then fired, demoted or cut has a retaliation claim under Labor Code 6310, one year to file with the Labor Commissioner and longer to sue. Injuries themselves go through workers' compensation. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, inspection 341438059, checked Nov 4, 2026. How to read a record. Back to the safety tracker.
About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.