What happened in this inspection
Cal/OSHA opened a planned inspection of Bowman Water Treatment Plant at 595 Christian Valley Rd, Auburn (Placer County) on Apr 20, 2011. It was a partial inspection focused on safety hazards. The record lists 2 employees, a figure the employer reports to the inspector and one that can cover more than the site inspected, with union representation. The employer is a local government body. Inspectors issued 12 citations (0 serious) and proposed $2,550 in penalties; after appeal or settlement the current total is $1,200. 10 citations were contested before the Appeals Board. The case closed on Mar 11, 2012.
Citations
Each citation names the rule, its classification and the penalty as proposed and as it stands now.
Issued Apr 29, 2011. Proposed $0, current $0. 1 worker exposed. Abatement due Jun 1, 2011, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Apr 29, 2011. Proposed $0, current $0. 6 instances. 1 worker exposed. Abatement due Jun 1, 2011, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Aug 9, 2011. Proposed $0, current $0. 18 workers exposed. Contested Aug 22, 2011, final order Mar 22, 2012. Abatement due Sep 11, 2011, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Aug 9, 2011. Proposed $150, current $150. 16 workers exposed. Contested Aug 22, 2011, final order Feb 27, 2012. Abatement due Sep 11, 2011, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Aug 9, 2011. Proposed $450, current $150. 4 workers exposed. Contested Aug 22, 2011, final order Feb 27, 2012. Abatement due Sep 11, 2011, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Aug 9, 2011. Proposed $150, current $0. 4 workers exposed. Contested Aug 22, 2011, final order Feb 27, 2012. Abatement due Sep 11, 2011, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Aug 9, 2011. Proposed $150, current $150. 16 workers exposed. Contested Aug 22, 2011, final order Feb 27, 2012. Abatement due Sep 11, 2011, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Aug 9, 2011. Proposed $300, current $150. 17 workers exposed. Contested Aug 22, 2011, final order Feb 27, 2012. Abatement due Sep 11, 2011, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Aug 9, 2011. Proposed $600, current $150. 17 workers exposed. Contested Aug 22, 2011, final order Feb 27, 2012. Abatement due Sep 11, 2011, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Aug 9, 2011. Proposed $150, current $150. 17 workers exposed. Contested Aug 22, 2011, final order Feb 27, 2012. Abatement due Sep 11, 2011, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Aug 9, 2011. Proposed $300, current $150. 17 workers exposed. Contested Aug 22, 2011, final order Feb 27, 2012. Abatement due Sep 11, 2011, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Aug 9, 2011. Proposed $300, current $150. 17 workers exposed. Contested Aug 22, 2011, final order Feb 27, 2012. Abatement due Sep 11, 2011, completed. Read the rule.
Your rights
If you worked at this site, the inspection file is a public record once the case closes; request it from the Cal/OSHA district office with activity number 314326638. A worker who reported the hazard, the injury or the inspection and was then fired, demoted or cut has a retaliation claim under Labor Code 6310, one year to file with the Labor Commissioner and longer to sue. Injuries themselves go through workers' compensation. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, inspection 314326638, checked Nov 4, 2026. How to read a record. Back to the safety tracker.
About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.