What happened in this inspection
Cal/OSHA opened a planned inspection of Jung Kun Kim dba United Construction at 4120-4122 23rd Street, San Francisco (San Francisco County) on Oct 24, 2006. It was a partial inspection focused on safety hazards. The record lists 5 employees, a figure the employer reports to the inspector and one that can cover more than the site inspected. Inspectors issued 18 citations (9 serious) and proposed $8,460 in penalties; after appeal or settlement the current total is $2,965. The case closed on Oct 30, 2008.
Citations
Each citation names the rule, its classification and the penalty as proposed and as it stands now.
Issued Jan 29, 2007. Proposed $435, current $250. 3 instances. Abatement due Feb 1, 2007, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 29, 2007. Proposed $85, current $50. 5 workers exposed. Abatement due Feb 1, 2007, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 29, 2007. Proposed $85, current $0. 5 workers exposed. Abatement due Feb 1, 2007, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 29, 2007. Proposed $130, current $50. 5 workers exposed. Abatement due Feb 8, 2007, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 29, 2007. Proposed $130, current $0. 5 workers exposed. Abatement due Feb 1, 2007, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 29, 2007. Proposed $195, current $0. 2 instances. 5 workers exposed. Abatement due Feb 1, 2007, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 29, 2007. Proposed $0, current $0. 2 workers exposed. Abatement due Feb 1, 2007, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 29, 2007. Proposed $195, current $110. 5 workers exposed. Abatement due Feb 1, 2007, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 29, 2007. Proposed $130, current $75. 1 worker exposed. Abatement due Feb 1, 2007, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 29, 2007. Proposed $1,575, current $900. 5 workers exposed. Abatement due Feb 1, 2007, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 29, 2007. Proposed $1,575, current $90. 4 instances. 5 workers exposed. Abatement due Feb 1, 2007, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 29, 2007. Proposed $155, current $90. 2 workers exposed. Abatement due Feb 1, 2007, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 29, 2007. Proposed $155, current $90. 3 instances. 2 workers exposed. Abatement due Feb 1, 2007, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 29, 2007. Proposed $155, current $90. 2 workers exposed. Abatement due Feb 1, 2007, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 29, 2007. Proposed $155, current $90. 2 instances. 2 workers exposed. Abatement due Feb 1, 2007, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 29, 2007. Proposed $155, current $90. 3 instances. 2 workers exposed. Abatement due Feb 1, 2007, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 29, 2007. Proposed $1,575, current $90. 2 workers exposed. Abatement due Feb 1, 2007, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Jan 29, 2007. Proposed $1,575, current $900. 1 worker exposed. Abatement due Feb 1, 2007, completed. Read the rule.
Your rights
If you worked at this site, the inspection file is a public record once the case closes; request it from the Cal/OSHA district office with activity number 307396424. A worker who reported the hazard, the injury or the inspection and was then fired, demoted or cut has a retaliation claim under Labor Code 6310, one year to file with the Labor Commissioner and longer to sue. Injuries themselves go through workers' compensation. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, inspection 307396424, checked Nov 4, 2026. How to read a record. Back to the safety tracker.
About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.