What happened in this inspection
Cal/OSHA opened a planned inspection of Injex Industries, Inc at 30559 San Antonio St, Hayward (Alameda County) on Mar 24, 2004. It was a complete inspection of the worksite focused on safety hazards. 300 employees were recorded at the site, with union representation. Inspectors issued 11 citations (2 serious, 1 repeat) and proposed $16,770 in penalties; the current total is $8,760. 3 citations were contested before the Appeals Board. 3 citations were deleted on appeal and are not counted. The case closed on Aug 22, 2006. The employer has 3 other inspections on its California record.
Citations
Each citation names the rule, its classification and the penalty as proposed and as it stands now.
Issued May 19, 2004. Proposed $150, current $150. 300 workers exposed. Abatement due Jun 21, 2004, completed. Read the rule.
Issued May 19, 2004. Proposed $150, current $150. 2 instances. 300 workers exposed. Abatement due Jun 21, 2004, completed. Read the rule.
Issued May 19, 2004. Proposed $0, current $0. 2 instances. 300 workers exposed. Abatement due Jun 21, 2004, completed. Read the rule.
Issued May 19, 2004. Proposed $0, current $0. 2 instances. 300 workers exposed. Abatement due Jun 21, 2004, completed. Read the rule.
Issued May 19, 2004. Proposed $2,700, current $1,200. 300 workers exposed. Contested Oct 25, 2004, final order Nov 15, 2004. Abatement due May 26, 2004, completed. Read the rule.
Issued May 19, 2004. Proposed $2,700, current $2,700. 300 workers exposed. Contested Oct 22, 2004, final order Nov 15, 2004. Abatement due May 26, 2004, completed. Read the rule.
Issued May 19, 2004. Proposed $2,700, current $2,700. 300 workers exposed. Contested Oct 25, 2004, final order Nov 15, 2004. Abatement due May 26, 2004, completed. Read the rule.
Issued May 19, 2004. Proposed $2,700, current $600. 300 workers exposed. Abatement due May 26, 2004, completed. Read the rule.
Issued May 19, 2004. Proposed $2,700, current $600. 300 workers exposed. Abatement due May 26, 2004, completed. Read the rule.
Issued May 19, 2004. Proposed $270, current $60. 300 workers exposed. Abatement due May 26, 2004, completed. Read the rule.
Issued May 19, 2004. Proposed $2,700, current $600. 300 workers exposed. Abatement due May 26, 2004, completed. Read the rule.
Issued May 19, 2004. Proposed $300, current $0. 2 instances. 300 workers exposed. Abatement due Jun 21, 2004. Read the rule.
Issued May 19, 2004. Proposed $270, current $0. 300 workers exposed. Contested Oct 25, 2004, final order Nov 15, 2004. Abatement due May 26, 2004. Read the rule.
Issued May 19, 2004. Proposed $270, current $0. 300 workers exposed. Contested Oct 25, 2004, final order Nov 15, 2004. Abatement due May 26, 2004. Read the rule.
Your rights
If you worked at this site, the inspection file is a public record once the case closes; request it from the Cal/OSHA district office with activity number 300741170. A worker who reported the hazard, the injury or the inspection and was then fired, demoted or cut has a retaliation claim under Labor Code 6310, one year to file with the Labor Commissioner and longer to sue. Injuries themselves go through workers' compensation. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, inspection 300741170, checked Nov 1, 2026. How to read a record. Back to the safety tracker.
About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.