What happened in this inspection
Cal/OSHA opened a complaint inspection of Pick Your Part at 936 Mission Rock Rd., Santa Paula (Ventura County) on Oct 17, 2000. It was a partial inspection focused on health hazards. The record lists 13 employees, a figure the employer reports to the inspector and one that can cover more than the site inspected. Inspectors issued 9 citations (1 serious) and proposed $4,690 in penalties; after appeal or settlement the current total is $2,575. 9 citations were contested before the Appeals Board. 4 citations were deleted on appeal and are not counted. The case closed on Sep 1, 2006. The employer has 9 other inspections on its California record.
Citations
Each citation names the rule, its classification and the penalty as proposed and as it stands now.
Issued Mar 30, 2001. Proposed $110, current $110. Contested Jun 6, 2001, final order Aug 22, 2002. Abatement due Apr 4, 2001, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Mar 30, 2001. Proposed $110, current $0. Contested Jun 6, 2001, final order Aug 22, 2002. Abatement due Apr 4, 2001, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Mar 30, 2001. Proposed $110, current $0. Contested Jun 6, 2001, final order Aug 22, 2002. Abatement due Apr 17, 2001, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Mar 30, 2001. Proposed $0, current $0. Contested Jun 6, 2001, final order Aug 22, 2002. Abatement due Apr 17, 2001, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Mar 30, 2001. Proposed $0, current $0. Contested Jun 6, 2001, final order Aug 22, 2002. Abatement due Apr 17, 2001, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Mar 30, 2001. Proposed $110, current $0. Contested Jun 6, 2001, final order Aug 22, 2002. Abatement due Apr 4, 2001, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Mar 30, 2001. Proposed $2,025, current $440. Contested Jun 6, 2001, final order Aug 22, 2002. Abatement due Apr 4, 2001, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Mar 30, 2001. Proposed $200, current $0. Contested Jun 6, 2001, final order Aug 22, 2002. Abatement due Apr 17, 2001, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Mar 30, 2001. Proposed $2,025, current $2,025. Contested Jun 6, 2001, final order Aug 22, 2002. Abatement due Apr 17, 2001, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Mar 30, 2001. Proposed $110, current $0. Contested Jun 6, 2001, final order Aug 22, 2002. Abatement due Apr 4, 2001, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Mar 30, 2001. Proposed $110, current $0. Contested Jun 6, 2001, final order Aug 22, 2002. Abatement due Apr 17, 2001. Read the rule.
Issued Mar 30, 2001. Proposed $110, current $0. Contested Jun 6, 2001, final order Aug 22, 2002. Abatement due Apr 17, 2001, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Mar 30, 2001. Proposed $2,025, current $0. Contested Jun 6, 2001, final order Aug 22, 2002. Abatement due Apr 17, 2001, completed. Read the rule.
Your rights
If you worked at this site, the inspection file is a public record once the case closes; request it from the Cal/OSHA district office with activity number 126142629. A worker who reported the hazard, the injury or the inspection and was then fired, demoted or cut has a retaliation claim under Labor Code 6310, one year to file with the Labor Commissioner and longer to sue. Injuries themselves go through workers' compensation. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, inspection 126142629, checked Nov 4, 2026. How to read a record. Back to the safety tracker.
About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.